Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Midwife of Vatican II  (Read 30155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Midwife of Vatican II
« Reply #330 on: January 29, 2010, 07:00:54 PM »
I have just read that in the early Church sex during pregnancy was forbidden --

http://www.wikigender.org/index.php/History_of_Attitudes_towards_Contraception

I am reading now in a book called The Catholic Church on Marital Intercourse that St. Jerome was against the conjugal act taking place during pregnancy.  This book has all kinds of interesting quotes.

Innocent III, On the Seven Penitential Psalms:  "Who does not know that conjugal intercourse is never committed without itching of the flesh, and heat and foul concupiscence, whence the conceived seeds are befouled and corrupted?"  

Such is how the Church used to speak.  Some things changed over time, but what can never change is that you can not deliberately frustrate the primary purpose of marriage:  Childbirth.  Sex during pregnancy may be some kind of sin, it may be frowned upon by God, but it doesn't frustrate the primary end.  

I wonder if it might not possibly harm the child though?  All that jostling can't be good.

The Midwife of Vatican II
« Reply #331 on: January 29, 2010, 07:22:40 PM »
Wow.  You know how all NFP defenders talk about the 1880 and 1853 decisions supposedly allowing the rhythm method ( though they don't, they just overlook it? )  

In 1886, it turns out, the Sacred Penitentiary said that confessors should actually interrogate penitents about their sɛҳuąƖ practices, reversing former decisions that stuck close to the lenient confessional style of St. Alphonsus.  If they were found practicing any form of birth control, they were committing mortal sin.  However, the author of this book does not say if the rhythm method was classified under birth control.

This decision is in the Decisionae Sanctae Sedis.  I can't find it online.  

Of course, since the modern heretics are disposed towards NFP, they only regurgitate the decisions that help their cause.  They try to make it seem like there is a clean, straight line leading to NFP.  But pastoral practices changed over time and what was tolerated as a lesser evil in 1880 may have been forbidden in 1886.  Either way, the rhythm method was never permitted -- just overlooked.  No decision EVER said it was without sin, not until Pius XII.