I know for a fact you are definitely not a Catholic, and I don't have to be a theologian to do so.

Your definition of Catholicism is Jansenism and extremism.

Among other things, you blatantly deny and reject the salvation dogma. That alone makes you a heretic.

Absurd. I never denied the salvation Dogma.

know for a fact being a traditional Catholic is not putting the Mass before the Faith, as all of you do.

Wrong again, I don't put the Mass above the Faith.

Oh so that there is no salvation outside the Church, or that a heretic is outside the Church and cannot be a Pope, is not a dogma then?

I never said there is salvation outside the Church.

Your definition of Catholicism is Jansenism and extremism.

How so? Don't merely say it, prove it.

Absurd. I never denied the salvation Dogma.

Oh no? You believe those who are invincibly ignorant can be saved as long as they live a "good life and are honest" and you also believe in salvation by implicit desire, a perversion no Saint ever taught.

Wrong again, I don't put the Mass above the Faith.

Then why do you go to the SSPX and regard them as catholics?  

I never said there is salvation outside the Church.

Salvation by invincible ignorance and implicit desire is to say there is salvation outside the Church.

Disputationes -- you are GONE.

I don't allow schismatics on this board.  Any sedevacantist that takes a butcher knife chainsaw to the Mystical Body of Christ is NOT WELCOME HERE.

All baptized Traditional Catholics are part of the Mystical Body of Christ, whether you like it or not.

Cutting them off, treating them as heretics, refusing communion with them just because they disagree with you on the so-called "sede vacante dogma" is SCHISMATIC and GRAVELY SINFUL.

Oh, and I see you're a Feeneyite as well. Feeneyites are the worst when it comes to bitterness, lack of charity, and schismatic spirit.

Sede vacante is not a dogma. It is a prudential position, the correctness of which IS open for debate.

It might seem odd for a long-time supporter of the SSPX to lambast Schism. But we have to remember -- true Schism IS a big deal. It's gravely sinful, and something to be studiously avoided.

The SSPX, in cleaving to the timeless Catholic Faith and Tradition, is NOT schismatic. It's the pope, cardinals, bishops and most priests who are in schism by breaking with Catholic Tradition and trying to create a new Faith.

Good decision to ban him, Matthew. Thank you.

Disputationes -- you are GONE.

Deo gratias!

His role-play as inquisitor was a bit amusing, but it started getting eerie...

I commend him and those of similar mind to the patronage of St. Dymphna.

Calling every SSPX priest a "heretic" is pretty strong words, gooch.

Heretics normally get something (thirty pieces of silver or equivalent) for their heresy -- they aren't normally such edifying, self-sacrificing model Catholics bearing great amounts of fruit and displaying such virtues (fruits of the Spirit).

Are you saying all these Catholics of good will are going to lose their souls? How can you believe such a thing.

Maybe the juridical state of the Pope is simply not something we (or the SSPX priests) can do anything about, and something we should not worry about.

As long as we don't follow the Pope's erroneous opinions, we will be fine.

"now the only option to recieve the sacraments are to go to a heretical priest"

This is itself heretical or at the very least gravely erroneous.

Not only what others have said, but to believe as you seem to that every Bishop and priest, even traditional, throughout the world without exception is in heresy, is itself a heresy, and an abominable one, which denies the dogma of the Church's indefectibility.

It makes a mockery of the concept of the teaching Church and inverts the relation in which the Church taught stands with respect to them. Read Pope St.Pius X's Catechism.

It is also plainly contrary to the First Vatican Council, which states, "It was his will that in his Church there should be shepherds and teachers until the end of time." The universal and Catholic Church as a whole cannot cease to be Apostolic, it is Bishops who can be successors to the Apostles, so she cannot cease to have at least some orthodox Bishops, who are shepherds and teachers, as you seem to believe.