Oh, I see....I dont have the "judicial authority" and "csuitic competence" to denounce the Vatican 2 church, but Marcel Lefebvre and Mark Pivarunas does? That makes sense.
That's ARCHBISHOP Lefebvre to you. The fact that you refuse to give him and Bishop Pivarunas their proper titles makes it appear that you think they weren't validly ordained. Is that what you think?
I know practically nothing about Bishop Pivarunas' ordination, so I will let someone else comment on that. As for the Archbishop's, I assume you think he wasn't validly ordained because he was supposedly ordained by a Freemason, correct?
First of all, it has never been proven that Cardinal Leinart was a Freemason. And even if he was, to claim that he couldn't validly ordain someone would contradict what was taught by Pope Leo XIII and St. Thomas Aquinas:
“Concerning the mind or intention, inasmuch as it is in itself something internal, the Church does not pass judgment; but in so far as it is externally manifested, she is bound to judge of it. Now, if in order to effect and confer a Sacrament a person has seriously and correctly used the due matter and form, he is for that very reason presumed to have intended to do what the Church does. It is on this principle that the doctrine is solidly founded which holds as a true Sacrament that which is conferred by the ministry of a heretic or of a non-baptized person, as long as it is conferred in the Catholic rite.“ - Pope Leo XIII
In the words uttered by (the minister), the intention of the Church is expressed; and this suffices for the validity of the sacrament,EXCEPT THE CONTRARY BE EXPRESSED EXTERIORLY on the part of the minister”. - St. Thomas Aquinas
In other words, as long as the Catholic Bishop, whether he be Catholic or a heretic, observes externally the rite perscribed for the sacrament, according to Church teaching, he must be presumed to have the right intention and thus, the sacrament must be presumed to be valid.
I think people should take the words of a Pope and the words of the Common Doctor of the Catholic Church over an armchair theologian such as yourself.
Well you have to conclude logically that Marcel Lefebvre was committing schism when he physically left the Vatican 2 church and consecrated his own bishops with the disaproval of JP2.
It is the Vatican II church that is schismatic.
Dogmatic sedevacantists like you are the reason why so many people are turned off by sedevacantists. If it weren't for Archbishop Lefebvre you wouldn't have any TLMs to attend except the CMRI and Indult Masses.