how can you say he was NO when all he did was be pope and that for an extremely short time?
I don't think many in the world know much about him

The intrigue of the monarchs. It's about power. Was Cardinal Karol Wojtyla involved? Someone who wanted him to be Pope? Someone who disliked JPI? Dropping dead seems to be accepted in Vatican circles (Cardinal Meisner just did, I await the remaining 3 'Dubia' Cardinals' demise before the end of the year). A study of who these 'cardinals' are and their quest for power or those behind them is warranted.

The facts below pertaining to Jorge Bergoglio were once applauded. Humble Pope? He has proved not to be. However, he has proven to be cunning, unpredictable. Traits of a hunted man or a mafioso.


"As pope, his manner is less formal than that of his immediate predecessors: a style that news coverage has referred to as "no frills", noting that it is "his common touch and accessibility that is proving the greatest inspiration.  On the night of his election, he took a bus back to his hotel with the cardinals, rather than be driven in the papal car. The next day, he visited Cardinal Jorge María Mejía in the hospital and chatted with patients and staff. At his first media audience, the Saturday after his election, the Pope said of Saint Francis of Assisi: "The man who gives us this spirit of peace, the poor man", and he added "[h]ow I would like a poor Church, and for the poor".
Francis chose not to live in the official papal residence in the Apostolic Palace, but to remain in the Vatican guest house, in a suite in which he can receive visitors and hold meetings. He is the first pope since Pope Pius X to live outside the papal apartments."

It is an act. What I quoted above was taken from a wiki article on the world's first impression of Bergoglio. True Catholics have unfortunately seen his true (wolf) colors.

There is definitely a lot that is unexplained about the death of John Paul I ... it certainly seems highly suspicious. But I am among those who strongly doubts that if he was murdered, he was not murdered because he was some sort of traditionalist who was going to turn back Paul VI's reforms. On the contrary, the acts he did during his very short time as pope suggest he was going to accelerate things even more. For example:

He was the first of the Vatican II papal claimants to use a "papal inauguration" ceremony instead of the tradtional coronation. He was the first to completely refuse the tiara (Paul VI was crowned, although I don't think he wore the tiara again afterwards).

In his Angelus address of 10 September 1978 he said that God "is our Father; even more He is our Mother" which is at least a novel way to speak about the First Person of the Trinity.

He expressed a commitment to "renewing the Church" by implementing the Vatican II reforms.


Also, some of his actions before being "elected" "pope" would suggest he was liberal, such as:

In 1968, when he was bishop of Vittorio Veneto, he submitted a report to the Patriarch of Venice that argued that birth control pills should be permitted.

I'm sure there's more, but that's about the extent of my knowledge of JPI aside from the general reputation/impression I've heard from people who were around at the time of his election who were strongly of the view that he was very liberal and they were happy that he'd been elected because they thought he would allow things like aforementioned use of birth control. I don't know whether they were right, but it all paints a picture of someone who was unlikely to have been αssαssιnαtҽd for being an arch-conservative. I have heard that it was more about the Vatican Bank.



 

Fr. Gregory Hesse knew JPI before he was elected Pope. Fr. assured me that he was very liberal, and a sort of "peace/love/hippy" type of bishop. So not much doctrinal improvement could have been expected by him, however, insiders have said that he was getting ready to take steps to reform the Vatican bank which was pretty corrupt. So when corrupt money interests get threatened with changes, sinister things can happen.
.
Also, he was pope for just 33 days. 33 is a very important number for Freemasons. Not hard evidence, but shouldn't be ignored. Could be an important clue.