Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This doesn't sound like a man who would grant an annulment:http://www.cmri.org/97prog9-1.htm
Well, he can't really "grant" anything. As with a couple other sedevacantists I knew, they give their opinion on the matter. There are some clear-cut cases, e.g. where a person baptized Catholic "married" before a justice of the peace, or else "married" someone who had already been married. They limit themselves to these clear-cut cases and would never venture into the realm of the difficult cases which would traditionally have required multi-year investigations and the calling of witnesses. Not only do they not have the time, but they do not have the training nor the authority to be able to adjudicate these cases.
So are you saying that the only marriage cases traditionalist bishops render judgment upon, are those that involve lack/defect of form?That is really more an administrative matter than anything else. It doesn't require any assessment of the marriage other than "did they observe canonical form and/or did they attempt to marry a person whom they were not free to marry?".