Author Topic: Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs (Read 264 times)

Incredulous · « **on:** July 29, 2021, 06:48:08 PM »

This is an excerpt from an article written a few years ago about JPII's visit to the ѕуηαgσgυє, where the jєω-pope apologized for 2,000 years of Catholic history: Is the Catholic Church becoming a Branch of the ѕуηαgσgυє?

This excerpt provides a partial history of the Popes, Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils warning Catholics and admonishing Jєωs against
the evils and dangers of judaism. These docuмents are still valid.

If we had followed the advise of our Church Fathers, we wouldn't be faced with a vax genocide today

A. Popes “condemned” by John Paul II

Over the centuries, the Church has never changed her firm, wise stance on the Jєωιѕн question. On the one hand, she prevented the Jєωs from being mistreated and she allowed their religion to be practiced in private. On the other hand, however, faced with the impossibility of converting them, she rebuked them for the crime of Deicide, exhorted them to repent, and isolated them in order to prevent them from perverting Catholics.

Thus, regarding Judaism, numerous Popes taught, condemned, and prescribed the following:

* St. Gregory the Great (590-604), in Epistulae (VIII, XXV, cf. IX, LV), wrote that unrestricted liberty should not be granted to the Jєωs because of the frequent offenses they made against the Faith. (10)

In a letter to the Frankish Kings, Theodoricus and Theodebertus, and to Queen Bruhilda, the Saint reminded them that Christians, members of the Body of Christ, should never be trampled upon by Jєωs, enemies of Christ. (11)

* Honorius I (625-638) urged the VI Council of Toledo, held in 638, to act forcefully regarding the danger the Jєωs represented for the Catholic Faith. (12)

* Leo VII (936-939) authorized Archbishop Frederic of Moguncia, Germany, to expel the Jєωs from the city, given the constant attacks they launched against the Catholics. (13)

* In a letter of January 17, 1208 addressed to the Count of Nevers, France, (14) Innocent III (1198-1216) lamented that feudal lords were employing Jєωs as “ministers of their extortions” because they exploited Christians through the practice of usury. (15)

* In 1239, after receiving a report compiled by Nicolas Donin, a converted Jєω from La Rochelle, that showed 35 articles in the тαℓмυd insulting the Catholic Faith, Gregory IX (1227-1241) wrote to the Western Bishops and Sovereigns ordering all copies of the Jєωιѕн book to be confiscated. He appointed William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris, to make an investigation on the matter. Once examined, the тαℓмυd was condemned and copies of it were burnt publicly in Paris in 1242. At the request of the Jєωs, the book was examined again in 1248 and definitively condemned by William of Auvergne and the masters of theology from Paris, among them St. Albert the Great. (16) In the work Excerpta тαℓмυdica [Excerpts from the тαℓмυd], written to justify the condemnation, one reads:

“By a secret design of Divine Providence, the errors, blasphemies, and outrages contained in the тαℓмυd had hitherto escaped the attention of the Doctors of the Church. The wall has finally been removed, and now one can clearly see the reptiles, the abominable idols that the house of Israel adores.” (17)

* Innocent IV (1243-1254) ordered the тαℓмυd to be burned because it was filled with errors and blasphemies. (18) In the Bull Sicut tua nobis of July 23, 1254, he authorized the Archbishop of Vienna to expel the Jєωs from his Diocese on account of their actions against the Catholic Faith and their disobedience of Church statutes. (19)

* In the Bull Damnabili perfídia of July 15, 1267, Clement IV (1265-1268) also condemned the тαℓмυd. (20)

* In the Bull Nimis in partibus anglicanis of November 18, 1285, Honorius IV (1285-1287) took the same attitude as his predecessors regarding the тαℓмυd. (21)

* John XXII (1316-1334) again condemned the errors of the тαℓмυd in the Bull Dudum felicis recordationis of September 4, 1320. (22)

* In the Bull Dudum ad nostram of August 8, 1442, Eugene IV (1431-1447) prohibited the Jєωs not only from living with Christians, as the Third Lateran Council had already established (Decree V, VI, 5), but also from living among Christians, given the continuous blasphemies and attacks of the Jєωs against the Catholic Faith. (23)

* Nicholas V (1447-1455), Calixtus III (1455-1458), and Paul II (1464-1471) reenacted or renewed the decisions of their predecessors. (24)

* In the Bull Intenta semper salutis, of May 31, 1484, Sixtus IV (1471-1484) ordered that Jєωs and Muslins in Spanish lands should live separate from Christians, should wear different clothing, and should not have Christian maids or servants in their houses, in addition to other measures aimed at protecting the faithful from dangers to the Faith resulting from living with Jєωs. (25)

Statements from the тαℓмυd

The тαℓмυd is considered one of the most important books of the Jєωιѕн religion. It wields a great influence on Jєωs, surpassed only by that of the Torah, the work that contains the principal books of the Old Testament. The тαℓмυd contains the doctrines, laws, and commentaries on Judaism made by the most expressive rabbis throughout History.

The following are some of the statements contained in the тαℓмυd:

“1. The souls of Jєωs have the privilege of being part of God himself. The souls of the other peoples of the earth come from the devil and are similar to those of animals ....

“5. As they await the coming of the Messiah, Jєωs live in a state of continuous war with the other peoples. When the victory is definitive, the peoples will accept the Jєωιѕн faith, but it is only the Christians who will not participate in this grace. On the contrary, they will be completely annihilated, because they descend from the devil ....

“8. Only the Jєωs are men; the other peoples are no more than types of animals. The dog is worth more than the non-Jєωs. The non-Jєωs are not only dogs, but asses. The souls of the non-Jєωs come from the impure spirit and the souls of Israel come from the spirit of God.

“9. The non-Jєωs were only created to serve the Jєωs day and night, without deviating from their service.

“10. It is prohibited for the Jєω to praise the learning or virtue of a Christian.

“11. It is not just to use mercy toward enemies ....

“14. The Jєωs can be hypocritical with the non-Jєω ....

“16. God granted all power over the goods and the blood of other peoples to the Jєωs.

“17. A non-Jєω who robs a Jєω, even should it be an alms, should be killed. On the contrary, it is permitted for Jєωs to do evil to non-Jєωs. To despoil a pagan [that is, a non-Jєω] is allowed ....

“19. You can deceive an outsider and practice usury against him ....

“21. Whoever loves a Christian would hate his own creator ....

“23. Annihilate the best of the non-Jєωs. Take the life of the most honest of the idolaters.

“24. If a pagan falls into a pit, we should cover the pit with a stone and try to prevent any measure that he might employ to get out. When we see him fall into a river or in danger of death, we should not save him. Maimonides counsels giving death wounds to every non-Jєω when this lies within our powers. It is just to exterminate every heretic [that is, non-Jєω] with your own hand; whoever sheds the blood of the impious offers a sacrifice to God ....

“Those who deny the teaching of Israel, particularly the followers of the Nazarene, should be killed and it is always a good work to execute them; if this is not possible, we should try to cause their deaths. But whoever kills a soul of Israel will be judged as if he had killed the entire world ....” (apud H. Delassus, La conjuration antichrétienne, vol. 3, pp. 1125-1128)

* During his pontificate, Leo X (1513-1521) was known for his goodness toward the Jєωs, which, incidentally, is recognized by Hebrew historians. He was, nevertheless, obliged several times to take action against abuses practiced by them. When he learned that the Jєωs had published a book against the Catholic Faith in Venice, he acted in a particularly severe fashion in his Brief of May 25, 1518, addressed to the Nuncio of Venice. (26)

* Julius III (1550-1555) approved the confiscation and burning of тαℓмυdic books by the Inquisition. He also authorized the edict of the Inquisition of September 12, 1553 ordering Princes, Bishops, and Inquisitors to do the same. In the Bull cuм sicut nupe, of May 29, l554, the Pope ordered the Jєωs to hand over all their books containing blasphemies or insults against Our Lord Jesus Christ. (27)

* Paul IV (1555-1559) enacted severe measures to defend the integrity of the Faith and prevent the Jєωs from dominating Catholics. In the Bull cuм nimis absurdum of July 14, 1555, the Pope ordered the Israelites of Rome and other cities in the Pontifical States to live separate from Christians in their own neighborhood. He also established that there should be only one ѕуηαgσgυє per city and that Jєωs could not have Catholic servants, work in public on Catholic feast days, write dishonest contracts, etc. (28)

The Jєωs attempted to bribe Paul IV by offering him 40,000 escudos to annul the Bull. (29) Along with other measures, the Pontiff ordered the destruction of the тαℓмυdic and anti-Catholic books of the Jєωs. (30)

* Pius IV (1560-1565) in 1564 placed the тαℓмυd on the Index librorum prohibitorum [Index of forbidden books] and prohibited books interpreting, commenting or expounding on it. (31)

* In the Bull Hebraeorum gens of February 26, 1569, St. Pius V (1566-1572) expressly condemned the Jєωs who dedicated themselves to the practice of “divination, sortilege, sorcery and witchcraft.” (32) In that bull St. Pius V also accused the Jєωs of other crimes such as usury, theft, receiving stolen goods, and soliciting for prostitution. He closes his bull with these words:

Quote

“Finally, we consider as known and proven how offensively this perverse generation [the Jєωs] offends the name of Christ, how hostile it is to those who carry the name of Christians, even making attempts against their lives.” (33)

By a decree of February 26, 1569, St. Pius V expelled the Jєωs from the Pontifical States, since, in addition to the mentioned crimes, the Jєωs spied for the Muslims and supported their plans of conquest that endangered all Christendom. (34) In this Brief, he said:

Quote

“We know that this most perverse people have always been the cause and seed-bag of almost all the heresies.” (35)

To this vigilant energy against the Jєωιѕн perfidy, St. Pius V added his zealous desire for their conversion. One of the most remarkable conversions he achieved was that of the chief-rabbi of Rome, Elias, followed by the conversions of his three sons and one grandson. On June 4, 1566, they solemnly received Baptism at St. Peter’s Basilica in the presence of the Sacred College of Cardinals and a multitude of the faithful. (36)

* In the Brief of May 27, 1581, Gregory XIII (1572-1585) warned the faithful and religious authorities against the false conversions of Jєωs as a means to infiltrate the Catholic Church. (37) In the Bull Antiqua ʝʊdɛօrum improbitas of June 1, 1581, the Pontiff established these conditions for when Jєωs must be submitted to the vigilance of the Inquisition:

Quote

a. when they attack Catholic dogmas;
b. when they invoke devils or offer sacrifices to them;
c. when they teach Catholics to do the same;
d. when they speak blasphemies against Our Lord and Our Lady;
e. when they try to induce Catholics to abandon their Faith;
f. when they forbid a Jєω or an infidel to convert;
g. when they consciously favor heretics;
h. when they disseminate heretical books;
i. when, in disdain for Our Lord, they crucify a lamb – principally on Good-Friday – and then spit on it and spew it with insults.
j. when they oblige Catholic wet-nurses to pour their milk into the toilettes and sewers after they have received the Eucharist. (38)

In the Brief of February 28, 1581, the Pope reaffirmed the prohibition against Jєωιѕн physicians tending to Catholic patients. (39)

* In the Bull cuм Hebraeorum of February 28, 1593, (40) Clement VIII (1592-1605) proscribed тαℓмυdic and cabalistic books, as well as works written in Hebrew containing errors. (41) The prohibition contained in this bull was included as a norm in the Index, published on March 27, 1596.

In 1592 Clement VIII re-established the preaching of sermons aimed at the conversion of the Jєωs and, at the same time, in the Bull Caeca et obdurata of January 25, 1593, reiterated the decrees of Paul IV and St. Pius V expelling them from the States of the Church, with the exception of the cities of Rome, Ancona, and Avignon. (42)

* Urban VIII (1623-1644) sent a Brief to the King of Spain on January 15, 1628 opposing the crime of usury practiced by the Jєωs of Portugal. (43)

* On September 15, 1751, Benedict XIV (1740-1758) signed and promulgated a docuмent reaffirming the cautionary measures regarding the тαℓмυd taken by the Popes since Innocent IV. (44)

* In October 1775 (45) and January 1793 (46), Pius VI (1775-1799) published two edicts confirming the directives of Benedict XIV regarding the Jєωs.

* Through a letter by his Secretary of State, Cardinal Merry del Val, St. Pius X (1903-1914) warmly praised the classic work of Msgr. Henri Delassus, La conjuration antichrétinne [The anti-Christian Conspiracy], which exposes the conspiracy of Judaism and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ against the Catholic Church and Christian Civilization. (47)

Other Bulls and Decrees

There are still many other Bulls of Popes and Decrees of Roman Congregations regarding the Jєωs, published in various collections and monographs, which number in the hundreds. In Juifs et chrétiens (cols. 1735-1736), F. Vernet presents copious docuмentation on this topic, transcribed here for readers who may be interested in learning more on the matter.

* Corpus juris canonici, Decretal. V. 6; Sextus Decretal., V, 13; Decret. Gratiani, Iª, XLV, 3, 5, LIV, 12-18; II, XIV, VI, 2, XXVIII, I, 10-15, 17; IIIq, IV, 93, 94, 98 and Septiumus Decretal., V, 1; A. Guerra, Pontificiarum constitutionum epitome, Venice, 1772, vol. I, pp. 191196 (summarizes 38 Bulls published in the Bullarium Romanum, Bullarium magnum, and other works);

* L. Ferraris, Prompta bibliotheca canonica, Venice, 1782, vol. IV, pp. 208-37 (summarizes a large number of Constitutions by Popes and the Roman Congregations);

* E. Rodocanachi, Le Saint Siège et les Juifs, Paris, 1891, pp. 322-29 (gives an overall picture of the main Bulls relating to the Jєωs);

* F. Vernet, Le Pape Martin V et les Juifs, in Révue des Questions Historiques, Paris, 1892, vol. 51, pp. 410-423 (analyzes 84 docuмents), and Papes et Juifs au XIe. siècle, in L’Université Catholique, Lyon, 1896, vol. 21, pp. 73-86 (analyzes docuмents from the Formularium of Marin d’Eboli regarding the Jєωs);

* M. Stern, Urkundliche Beitrãge über die Stellung der Pãpste zu den Juden, Kiel, 1893-1895, 2 volumes. The first volume contains the docuмents by Martin V and his successors; the second covers docuмents from Innocent III to Innocent IV;

• K. Eubel, Zu dem Verhalten der Pãpste gegen die Juden, in Römische Quartalschrift, Rome, 1899, vol. 13, pp. 29-43 (about the Popes who preceded Martin V);

* Constant, Les Juifs devant l’Eglise et l’Histoire, Paris, undated, 2nd ed., pp. 267-323, includes 16 Bulls on the topic;

* Gregoire des Rives, Epitome canonum conciliorum, Lyon, 1663, pp. 264-68;

* A. Geiger, Das Verhalten der Kirche gegen das Judenthum, in Das Judenthum und seine Geschichte, Breslau, 1870, vol. 2, F. Frank, Dir Kirche und die Juden, Regensburg, 1893.

About the Church and the Jєωs in the Pontifical States, see: F. Gregorovius, Le ghetto et les Juifs de Rome, in Promenades en Italie, Paris, 1894, pp. 1-60; E. Natali, Il ghetto di Roma, Rome, 1887, vol. 1; E. Rodocanachi, Le Saint Siège et les Juifs - Le ghetto à Rome, Paris, 1891; A. Berliner, Geschichte der Juden in Rom, Frankfurt, 1893, 3 vols.; H. Vogelstaein - P. Rieger, Geschichte der Juden in Rom, Berlin, 1895-96, 2 vols.

On the Church and the Jєωs of Avignon, see: L. Bardinet, Condition civile des Juifs du Comptat-Venaissin pendant le séjour des Papes à Avignon, in Révue Historique, Paris, 1880, vol. 12, pp. 1-47; R. de Maulde, Les Juifs dans les Etats français du Saint-Siège au Moyen Âge, Paris, 1886, as well as numerous articles in Révue des Études Juives.

10. Dictionnaire Apologetique de la Foi Catholique (DAFC), col. 1726. 11. See also Epistulae IX, CIX, CX, cf. III, XXXVIII, apud ibid., col. 1744.
12. René Aigrain, L’Espagne chrétienne, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise despuis les origins jusqu’à nos jours, Paris: Bloud & gαy, 1946-1960, vol. 5, p. 246
13. Auguste Dumas, Le sentiment religieux et ses aberrations, ibid., vol. 7, p. 463.
14 See also the letters of Jan. 16, 1205 to the King of France and of Jan. 10, 1208 to the Bishop of Auxerre
15. A. Fliche, La réforme de l’Eglise, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. 10, p. 142.
16. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, DAFC, col. 1691; Christine Thouzellier, L’enseignement et les universités, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol 10, pp. 379-380.
17. F. Vernet, Juifs et crétiens, ibid.
18. Registres d’Innocent IV, vol. 1, n. 682, Potthast, 11376, Chartularium, n. 131, ibid. vol. 1, nn. 173, 178; Saint Louis et Innocent IV, pp. 302-6, apud C. Thouzellier, L’enseignement et les universités, p. 380.
19. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1739.
20. Ibid., col. 1692.
21. Ibid.
22. Ibid.
23. Ibid., col. 1740.
24. Ibid., col. 1728.
25. Bernardino Llorca, Bulario Pontificio de la Inquisición Española, Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1949, pp. 106-8.
26. Arm. XXXIX, vol. 31, 1518, n. 48, and to the Doge, Arm. XL, vol. 3, n. 331, Vatican’s Secret Archives, apud Ludovic Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 8, p. 350.
27. Bull. VI, pp. 482-3, apud L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 13, p. 208.
28. Bull. VI, p. 498, apud ibid., vol. 14, pp. 234-5.
29. See a report on this topic in Révue des Études Juives, XX, 68, Masio, Letters, 515, Berliner, II, 2, 7; Rodocanachi, 40-2.; see also Letters of Saint Ignatius, V, pp. 288-9, apud L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 14, p. 236.
30. Caracciolo, Vita, 4, 11; Erler, Arquivo de Direito Canônico, L III, 49; Reusch, I, 48; Vogelstein-Rieger, II, 156-7; Berliner, II, 2, 8-9; see also same author, Censura y confisco de los libros judios en los Estados da la Iglesia, Frankfurt, 1891, apud L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 14, p. 239.
31. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1693.
32. Bull. Rom. VII, p. 740, apud L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 17, p. 301.
33. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1712.
34. Brief of May 3, 1569, apud Laderchi, 1569, n. 187.
35. Apud L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 17, p. 306.
36. Ibid., vol. 17, pp. 306-7.
37. Ibid., vol. 19, p. 281.
38. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1737.
39. L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 19, p. 282.
40. Reusch, I, 50, 333, 339, 534.
41. See in Sixtus of Siena (a converted Jєω), Bibliotheca sancta, Paris, 1610, pp. 310-1; see the list of books that he destroyed in Cremona; F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1738.
42. L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 24, pp. 111-2.; F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1731.
43. Epist. V, Vatican’s Secret Archive, L. Pastor, Historia de los Papas, vol. 28, p. 285.
44. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1694.
45. Analecta juris pontificii, Rome, 1860, pp. 1422-3.
46. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1694.
47. Henri Delassus, La conjuration antichrétienne, Lille: Desclée de Brouwer, 1910, vol. 1, p. V.

B. Councils “condemned” by John Paul II

The following councils were also included in the radical “anathema” that John Paul II issued at the Roman ѕуηαgσgυє:

* The Council of Elvira (302), held at the end of Diocletian’s persecution against the Christians, issued a canon that forbade Christians from giving their daughters in marriage to Jєωs; another canon prohibited Christians from sitting at the table with Hebrews. (48)

* These prohibitions were confirmed and renewed by the Councils of Laodicea (4th century); Vannes (465); Agda (506); Epaona (517) and by the three Councils of Orleans (530, 533, and 541). (49)

In a canon repeated in the Decree of Gratian, (III, D.IV, 93), the above-mentioned Council of Agda set down a series of precautions to be taken before baptizing Jєωs, “whose perfidy often makes them return to their vomit.” (50)

* The Council of Mâcon (581) enjoined Jєωs from holding posts allowing them to impose penalties on Christians. (51)

* In canon 14, the Council of Toledo (589) barred Jєωs from taking Christian women as wives. (52)

* The Council of Paris (614) sustained the prohibition against giving Jєωs public posts, whether civil or military. (53)

* The Fourth Council of Toledo (633), canon 59, stated that the sons of Jєωs who had falsely converted and then returned to Judaism should be educated in Catholic monasteries; it also ratified the measures adopted by King Sisenando regarding the Jєωs. (54)

The Jєωs record a long string of false messiahs. It is another evidence of Our Lord Jesus Christ's unique mission.

Above, Jacob Frank, a sham messiah.
Below, Sabbatai Zevi, another one.

30 Giorni, December 2001

Above, Menachen Schneerson from Brooklin, NY, a contemporary "messiah" who died June 12, 1994 without fullfilling his supposed mission

Corriere della Sera, July 3, 1992

* The Sixth Council of Toledo (638), canon 3, issued stern words against the Jєωs. (55)

* The Seventeenth Council of Toledo (694) was held to analyze a plot aiming to install a kind of Judaism in Spain under the appearance of the Catholic Religion. (56)

* Other Councils also forbade Catholics from hiring Jєωιѕн physicians, servants, and nursemaids. According to some Catholic moralists of the 18th century, depending on the circuмstances, to violate these prescriptions could constitute a mortal sin. (57)

* The Second Ecuмenical Council of Nicea (787) denounced the false conversions of Jєωs. (58)

* The Council of Metz (888), reaffirming former proscriptions in canon 7, prohibited Christians from taking meals with Jєωs. (59)

* The Third Ecuмenical Council of Lateran (1179) forbade wealthy Hebrews to take Christian nursemaids and slaves into their service. (60) It also anathematized those who, preferring Jєωs to Christians, received testimonies of Jєωs against Christians and not of Christians against Jєωs. (61)

* The Fourth Council of Avignon (1209) forbade Christians from dealing with Jєωs in financial matters; canons 3 and 4 impose the threat of excommunication for such dealings. (62)

* The Fourth Ecuмenical Lateran Council (1215), canon 67, condemned usurious Jєωιѕн money-lenders and prohibited Christians from engaging in commerce with them. Canon 68 ordered Jєωs to wear clothing that would distinguish them from Catholics, and also forbade them from appearing in public on Good Friday to prevent them from mocking the Christians with their festive dress. Canon 69 reaffirmed the prohibition of the Council of Toledo regarding Jєωs holding public posts. Finally, canon 70 condemned the Jєωs who, albeit claiming to have converted to the Catholic Faith, continued to practice rites of the Hebrew religion. (63)

* The Council of Narbonne (1227) established that Jєωs should wear a distinguishing mark in the shape of a small circle. According to J. Levi in an article in the Révue des Études Juives, (64) the circle symbolized the Host, habitually profaned by Jєωs. This emblem was adopted to be worn by the Jєωs everywhere except Spain. The Popes proposed such a symbol in order to distinguish Jєωs from Christians, since,

Quote

“favored by confusion, the Jєωs have infiltrated Catholic ranks and committed crimes that would have been difficult or impossible to carry out if there had been a suspicion or it was clearly known that they were Jєωs.” (65)

* The Ecuмenical Council of Basel (1434), among other measures, required the Jєωs to listen to Christian preachers and prohibited Catholics from participating in Jєωιѕн feasts. (66)

Quote

48. H. Delassus, La conjuration antichrétinne, vol. 3, p. 1157.
49. Ibid.
50. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1734.
51. H. Delassus, La conjuration antichrétinne, vol. 3, p. 1157.
52. R. Aigrain, L’Espagne Chrétienne, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. 5 p. 238.
53. H. Delassus, La conjuration antichrétinne, vol. 3, pp. 1157-8.
54. R. Aigrain, L’Espagne Chrétienne, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. 5, p. 241.
55. Ibid., pp. 245-6.
56. Ibid., p. 259.
57. H. Delassus, La conjuration antichrétinne, vol. 3, p. 1158.
58. Terminus, canon 8, in Conciliorum Oecuмenicorum Decreta, Rome: Herder, 1962, pp. 121-2.
59. Mansi, vol. 28, col. 79, apud A. Dumas, Le sentiment religieux et ses aberrations, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. 7, p. 463.
60. Jean Rousset de Pina, La politique italienne d’Alexandre III et la fin du schisme, ibid, vol. 9/2, p. 167.
61. Decret. II, XX, 21; F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1744.
62. A. Fliche, La réforme de l’Eglise, Fliche & Martin, Histoire de l’Eglise, vol. 10, p. 174.
63. Conciliorum Oecuмenicorum Decreta, pp. 241-3.
64. 1892, 1.XXIV.
65. F. Vernet, Juifs et Chrétiens, col. 1741.
66. Session XIX, Decretum de Iudaeis et neophytis, Conciliorum Oecuмenicorum Decreta, pp. 459-50.

songbird · « **Reply #1 on:** July 29, 2021, 08:42:24 PM »

Very good. I do believe in the Mystical City of God, it is said, that the demons would use the Jєωs as their instruments to bring evil into the world. To destroy souls, bring heresy and such.

Incredulous · « **Reply #2 on:** July 29, 2021, 09:46:40 PM »

Wow!... and that's Mother Mary speaking.

JOANORCM · « **Reply #3 on:** July 30, 2021, 08:19:29 AM »

It has always been very emotionally exhausting to me that Jєωs seem to always be involved in evil causes like abortion and transsɛҳuąƖism as well as sodomitic causes. Yet when you point it out to them, they take offense bc you're supposed to let them have free speech.

The books of E Michael Jones, though he is conservative NO, are very good and informative along these lines.

Author Topic: Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs (Read 264 times)

Incredulous

Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs

songbird

Re: Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs

Incredulous

Re: Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs

JOANORCM

Re: Encyclicals, Bulls and Councils against the Jєωs