In other words, what would be my motivation?
-- to attack the Dimonds (I don't have any ill will toward them)
-- to defend every word of their videos (I'm not a cult follower of them either)
-- to prove that many magic tricks are performed by cooperation with demons? I already know this.
-- to prove that EVERY trick in their (4-hour) video is? Don't feel the need to do that (see the above).
I've done just enough to expose that there's a bad will and agenda behind this latest attack on the Dimonds, whether out of personal animosity,our on account of Rationalism and lack of faith (not believing in the spiritual / preternatural world), and those two examples I went through (and wasted 10-15 minutes of my time each) suffice for that purpose.
I saw the guy building the metal structure for levitation (couldn't have happened) and the guy attempting to reproduce the Great Wall of China trick (epic fail due to the conditions I explained). Both are obvious and transparent fails and could only be accepted as evidence by someone applying confirmation bias and begging the question, for some agenda.
Now, I can't 100% rule out camera tricks, since you can do almost anything with that and video editing software and AI, but many of these appeared to have been performed in front of live audiences.
You don't have to attack the Dimonds, just simply admitting that they were wrong to accuse far too many people. Are you willing to do that
Can you give one, just one example of a trick that you believe is done by the cooperation of demons? Remember simply saying "I don't know how this trick is done, therefore demons" won't cut it. Your examples so far of David Copperfield and Special Head are simply examples of you not understanding the method.
You are still stuck on the "you must not believe in the supernatural". It's hard to believe you aren't a Dimond cult follower when all you do is regurgitate their failed talking points.
Be honest, did you watch the Deuterocomical video, specifically the part where he explains the levitations? It's fine if you didn't because ignorance is preferable to dishonestly, but I would recommend you do.
Also, the pure irony of you bringing up confirmation bias is amazing. The DImonds original video was just 4 hours of confirmation bias.
I'm glad that you are willing to admit that camera tricks are a possibility (something that Dimonds refuse to accept for some reason), so why is that unbelievable to you? Why is having an audience that is in on the trick so unbelievable for you? It happens all the time.
Topic: Dimonds double down on magicans - and new sedevacantist group? (Read 36764 times)