CathInfo.com

Unfortunately despite the recent videos in which the dimonds were more charitable it seems they have doubled down on their magicians video (or at least the social media handler).

https://twitter.com/DeoVolente019/status/1755574918404620602

https://twitter.com/TRUTHACRUSADA/status/1755503050800730341

Also from the guy in the first link, he said elsewhere that he is part of a new sedevacantist group. Website is below, I haven't read through all of it but I have this seen site before but the design and name has changed and much more articles have been added. It seems they are against invincible ignorance, baptism of blood and desire. This is nice, at least for me, as I have not seen any other groups than the Dimonds to be against these 3 things.

https://cognitioecclesiae.weebly.com/

I would hardly call it a "group".  It's probably just one guy who put up a website.  Yet, the guy with the creepy All-Seeing-Eye logo (used by both Satanists and Masons) is attacking the Dimond Brothers for their show on the magicians (which are, IMO, very solid).  And then on his website he features two letters written by St. Athanasius to a Bishop Lucifer (who, though he seemed like an upstanding and orthodox Catholic bishop), why are they focusing on Lucifer when the same content from St. Athanasius could be found elsewhere.

So, given the following:

1) Satanic/Masonic logo
2) Focus on a Bishop Lucifier
3) attacking the Dimond Brothers for calling out the occult nature of modern magic

I suspect that this is some kind of diabolical ruse and would stay FAR away from these clowns, and that he (or they) is nothing but a demonic clown.  Of all the things to attack the Dimond Brothers for, it's to defend and justify modern "magic" when about 1/3 of the video cites the guys themselves that they're cooperating with demons or other entities to perform their tricks, which are in fact inexplicable apart from total CGI camera tricks ... except that many/most of them were performed in front of live audiences.

I personally know a handful of converts that came to Traditionalism (from other faiths) due to the Diamonds.  All converts were men. 


The Diamonds are a little nutty on some things, and I don't like their constant anathemas of heresy, but...in our overly feminized, wishy-washy, "maybe, sometimes" world, the Diamonds presentation of the Faith as "yes, yes and no, no" speaks to people, mostly men.  It works.  Can't argue with results.

Yes, and they've softened somewhat in recent times with the anathemas, but darn it if we don't need to hear it.  There's a prevailing tendency in modern times, even among Trads, that heresy is "no big deal," since everything depends on "sincerity".  Well, he probably "means well," so that's all that matters.  It's the same subjectivist nonsense that has led to most modern errors, as well as the phenomenology that Bishop Williamson has expertly taught about, where ideas don't matter, are subjective, and that sincerity and meaning well and being "nithe" (as Bishop Williamson mockingly pronounces it) are all that count.  Sometimes the Dimond Brothers do a service by calling a spade a spade and not performing some mealy-mouthed dance around it.

One need only look at the writings of the Fathers and the Councils, with all the anathemas they've hurled, to understand how seriously heresy was taken by them.  Some of the language St. Jerome uses towards heretics would make anything we've seen posted by the Dimonds tame by comparison.  It's important not to slide into a bitter zeal, but that can't be at the cost of going soft on heresy, since it destroys souls.