Author Topic: Dimond Captured On Film: Gregory XVII Remained Pope By Church Teaching (Read 1799 times)

lewis · « **on:** May 15, 2011, 01:20:35 PM »

A member mentioned The Dimond's "ridiculous errors". I would add damning to that . . .

The Dimonds believe "Siri" was elected pope. However, in the Fall of 2005 when information about "Siri" being a hostage pope was internationally released, they IMMEDIATELY violated Church teaching claiming (JUDGING) "Siri" stopped being pope at some undefined time.

Many people know that the Dimonds used to market a video which has Michael Dimond relaying the Church's timeless teaching, that no one can judge (dethrone) a valid pope.

View the Video here:

The video posted By "TearingTheMaskOff" exposes Michael Dimond's contradiction of Church teaching and his own words captured on film, regarding, that no one can judge a pope (who has no superiors on earth).

From the YouTube posting - Dimond Captured On Film: Gregory XVII Remained Pope By Church Teaching:

*Dimond believes Cardinal Siri (A.K.A. Gregory XVII) was elected pope. (This can be found on his "MHFM" website).

*Dimond in this video (he no longer sells) gives the Church's correct teaching that a lawfully elected pope CANNOT be judged by anyone to lose His office (to cease being pope).

*Dimond in the Fall of 2005 (contradicting both Church teaching and his OWN WORDS) judged "Siri" (A.K.A. Pope Gregory XVII) as losing His Divine Office as Christ's Vicar (i.e. that he stopped being pope) which contradicts Catholic law.

*Dimond violated the Catholic teaching that "no one can ever judge (dethrone) a valid pope" in the fall of 2005 immediately after a widely read docuмented international press release showed that Pope Gregory XVII was a hostage of the masons for 30 years; who could kill him at anytime - and that Gregory XVII (the suffering pope mentioned in the Fatima message) created Cardinals in 1988 to carry on the true Hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, that can never be overcome.

*Dimond wrongfully applies the Church's teaching that no one can dethrone (judge) a validly elected pope - to a modernist heretic named Karol Józef Wojtyla (A.K.A,. Antipope John Paul II), who never was elected pope, as Gregory XVII was reigning at the time (as a hostage out of the public eye). Dimond states Padre Pio said (predicted) Wojtyla would be a pope. Note: Padre Pio is alleged to have had people (monks) around him change/forge "his" words according to at least one person who knew him and published an extensive book about his life. Also, of most import, Karol Józef Wojtyla by the Church's teaching found in Pope Paul IV's Infallible, cuм Ex Apostolatus Officio, was ineligible for all time to ever be pope - as he was a manifest heretic prior to his pseudo "election" (de fide).

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** May 15, 2011, 03:05:01 PM »

My understanding of cuм Ex Apostolatus Officio is that a Pope who is discovered to be a heretic even though legally elected would indeed lose his office and become anti-pope.

Although Pope Gregory XVII may not be the best Pope we ever had, I do not believe that he lost his office.

Lighthouse · « **Reply #2 on:** May 15, 2011, 03:32:49 PM »

Hey, where ya been, Roscoe?

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** May 15, 2011, 04:13:54 PM »

Hi Lighthouse--just taking a break from the Jansenist/ v2 heresy that permeates this Forum.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #4 on:** May 15, 2011, 04:20:35 PM »

No, CatholicInfo needs a permanent break from the heresy and chaos that fills this forum whenever roscoe posts on here.

Deliveringit1 · « **Reply #5 on:** May 16, 2011, 01:16:41 PM »

So Lewis and Roscoe, you both think Siri was indeed elected Pope?

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** May 16, 2011, 05:46:48 PM »

Possibly even 2X

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #7 on:** May 16, 2011, 07:25:43 PM »

Please be aware that both lewis (aka David Hobson) and roscoe don't know what they're talking about. Siri MIGHT have been elected, but it hasn't been proven. Both Hobson and roscoe are obssessed with the Siri thesis.