He literally came out and said we need to toss out Vatican II entirely. Not even the SSPX says that anymore.
SSPX says that V2 is 95% good and needs a few corrections (along the lines of Bishop Schneider).
+Vigano recently said there should be an investigation into whether Bergoglio is legitimate. He was dead set against the jab and calling out the conspiracy of the Plandemic. His original June 9 letter (his anti-V2 manifesto) to Bishop Schneider called out all the V2 papal claimants, including Benedict XVI and said that the entire thing needed to be scrubbed. He recently came out in favor of the pre-Pius XII Holy Week.
So for those who claim he's some kind of controlled opposition, I insist that you provide an explanation of what exactly they're accomplishing. Cui bono?
He's keeping people from going full-blown SV? Nobody who wasn't against SVism in the first place. If anything, he's drawing people mired in the conservative wing of the Conciliar Church to the right. So why would the conspirators think that's a good idea?
I can easily see +Fellay, +Schneider, and +Voris being controlled opposition ... but I have yet to see a credible charge against +Vigano nor a convincing explanation of what they're trying to accomplishing by raising up a figure like +Vigano.