CathInfo.com

[...]

Ladislaus, I was deep into the Dissident Right circles years before I became Catholic. You have reacted so strongly that I would have identified you very differently in a non-Catholic setting. I want to think you are intelligent and sincere, but perhaps you are so obtuse due to years of conditioning.

In my reply what I am referring to is that these people always have consistent alibis and lie constantly. If you want them to confess, that simply isn't likely to happen. There has been research done into Fr. Vigano and if you spent five seconds on Google you might have found signs of it.

You keep repeating slander and I think you know better. StLouisIX has done a great job on the forums and has a lot more time than I do. I hope you are right about your desire to seek the truth and that we might find a better understanding of one another, if such is the case. A sign of that would be for you to honestly critique a post criticizing Putin the next time it comes up, rather than keeping it all to yourself and assuming we know your mind.

Why would he get consecrated if he hasn't come to the conclusion yet that NO episcopal consecration is doubtful?  And even if he were consecrated, why would he start ordaining priests?  Every flavor of Traditional Catholicism has one or more bishops now that are adequate to serve the needs of the respective groups.  Which group(s) would he ordain for and why?  Should he start his own rival seminary?  In fact, if he did that, I'd be MORE inclined to suspect that he might be controlled opposition.

As for declaring the See Vacant, while I would love to see him do exactly that, why would he do it if he hasn't come to the conclusion that it's vacant?  In his one letter about Bennyvacantism, he seemed to take the same line as Archbishop Lefebvre that he would need to wait for the Church to officially do that.  [Of course, if he isn't the Church, and Lefebvre wasn't the Church, then who is the Church?  Are we waiting this current gaggle of Modernist Cardinals and Bishops to declare the See vacant?]

While you're disappointed that he isn't a full-blown sedevacantist yet, that has nothing to do with the current thread of allegations that he's some kind of controlled opposition.

Yet?  I'll believe it when I see it. Quite honestly, I think he'll just continue to write, and write, and write....and then he'll die.  I think too many put too much stock in him.  But I get it...this is what happens when there is no pope.

By the way, I wasn't trying to push the controlled opposition view because I'm not convinced one way or the other.  He may or may not be....anything is possible. 

It hasn't been done with Fr. Vigano as far as I recall, but you have proven that with Putin we are going to need his 2022 Communist Party card, a detailed genealogy of his Jєωιѕн heritage, a list with photographs and perhaps video of his murder victims, etc. ...

I just want to point out here that I was saying that no one has gone in-depth on Fr. Vigano on the forum, but I could be wrong. This is not to say that no one outside of the forum has done an examination of Fr. Vigano.