CathInfo.com

It would be a topic all on its own, but recently he's helped confirm your Duginistic opinions ("Holy Mother Russia" vs "Globohomo") and probably ensured people on the Alt-Right will be imprisoned or even shot as terrorists in the near future in the case of a Russian tactical nuclear strike. Rabbis have said that they will turn the people against the Patriots, and because so many people have been deceived by the narrative that Vigano helps push, it seems more and more likely that this will come to fruition.

Similarly to Bishop Williamson, I think he's fallen for the propaganda of "trad" Russia pushed by Western alt-media (like Paul Craig Roberts), and needs read up on Dugin and Eurasianism. 

I saw a copy of "Infiltration" and flipped through it. I forgot to check the index for Freemasons, тαℓмυd, Kabbalah, and Jews to see what the author had to say about that. Opus Dei is suspicious but I can't remember the details.

I seem to have in some "notes" that John XXIII was a Freemason and was not "elected" Pope until "Soviet" or "Soviet type" assets infiltrated inside the College of Cardinals reversed the legitimate election of Cardinal Siri as Pope, way back when, the "Cardinal Siri Thesis".

Yes, he needs to DO more than write starting with getting truly consecrated and helping ordain true priests.  Stop cowering in his hidden location. And last but not least, stop pussy footing around with Bergoglio: announce the Seat is Vacant.

Then I'll put some hope in him.

Why would he get consecrated if he hasn't come to the conclusion yet that NO episcopal consecration is doubtful?  And even if he were consecrated, why would he start ordaining priests?  Every flavor of Traditional Catholicism has one or more bishops now that are adequate to serve the needs of the respective groups.  Which group(s) would he ordain for and why?  Should he start his own rival seminary?  In fact, if he did that, I'd be MORE inclined to suspect that he might be controlled opposition.

As for declaring the See Vacant, while I would love to see him do exactly that, why would he do it if he hasn't come to the conclusion that it's vacant?  In his one letter about Bennyvacantism, he seemed to take the same line as Archbishop Lefebvre that he would need to wait for the Church to officially do that.  [Of course, if he isn't the Church, and Lefebvre wasn't the Church, then who is the Church?  Are we waiting this current gaggle of Modernist Cardinals and Bishops to declare the See vacant?]

While you're disappointed that he isn't a full-blown sedevacantist yet, that has nothing to do with the current thread of allegations that he's some kind of controlled opposition.