In what way does this book expose the MHFM?
They may not get everything right and they may be rather rude, but they sure are doing a lot more to expose the VII anti-church than are most people.
1) This book is a goldmine of rich tradition and historical Dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church and why the "Church" has constantly forbidden Catholics to pray "with" non-Catholics. And certainly, the CMRI, SSPX, MHFM, SBC are "not" Catholic!
2) Also, the book points out the inconsistent "errors" of the CMRI, SSPX, SSPV, MHFM, SBC and many others.
3) It also attacks the "Most Holy Family Monastery" and Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond, as being Heretical and scandalous - a must read!
4) And, I was totally unaware that Br. Andre Marie of the Saint Benedict Center In New Hampshire said that a "Freemason" could become pope.
5) Another part of the book deals with the Russian Orthodox Church and how it was invloved with the KGB -- what a shocker!
6) I was a little wary of the book but as I read I seen more and more the truth revealed. The book also states that the late Abp. Lefebvre and Bishop Mayer were Heretics for rejecting John Paul II.
7) Another section gets into the details of the Sedevacantist Chapels calling them Schismatical and Heretical. I think I read in the book about how Bishop Henneberry in Flordia was guilty or at least suspect of immorality along with Bishop Jason Spadafore.
8) Another part of the book condemns Deacon Mark A. Pivarunas as a Heretic for allowing people to go and receive "Communion" in the Chapels of the SSPX, yet is SedeVacantist.
9) Funny, the SEDEVACANTIST schismatics hold that the SSPX chapels are heretical but it is ok to receive "communion" in extreme necessity at the hands of the SSPX - is that "not" a contradicition?
Here are a few ridiculous comments from a ridiculous (and likely) Novus Ordo reviewer who has no idea of what she's talking about. I'm actually astonished by how absurd the reviewer is in making it seem like she's being sarcastic because she keeps putting everything in quotations, yet does not really make it clear as to whatever it is she's talking about.
1) Of all the possible things they could talk about with regards to Catholics praying with non-Catholics, they talk about societies and people that are actually Catholic. Saying that the SSPX isn't Catholic, of all things, is the most retarded thing I've ever heard spewed from a neo-Catholic's mouth. I'm sure this ignoramus isn't even aware of what his anti-church has to say about the SSPX, and how the faithful can attend their Masses and that they are not in schism. Instead of choosing to attack Benedict's manifestly heretical practices of going to Assisi to pray with infidels, heretics and schismatics, they attack trads. Wow.
2) As for the errors of the CMRI, SSPX and so on.. What are the few errors of these few societies compared to the astronomical amount of errors of the VII anti-Church and its children?
3) I will not comment on MHFM being heretical, because I'm not exactly sure if I can say that they are or aren't heretical (for the most part they are not).
4) A Freemason cannot become Pope because a Freemason is not Catholic. People don't make it to the papacy, far less the priesthood, without at least having a vague notion of what Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is.
5) Anyone who isn't oblivious to the fact that Communism completely (and yes, completely) overshadowed Russia could easily deduce that the Russian "Orthodox" Church was overrun with Communism.
6) If anyone is a heretic for denying anyone, it is John Paul II for denying Abp. Lefebvre.
7) Sedevacantist chapels are usually more likely to be right in virtually everything, whereas a Novus Ordo parish is likely to be wrong about almost everything.
8) All "sedevacantism" is is a theological opinion that the current claimant to the Papal throne is not the incuмbent Pope. How this would effect the eligibility to receive communion is beyond me. By reasonably doubting the Papacy of a certain Papal claimant, how is one denying any dogma or doctrine? (Hint: They're not)
9) What a blatantly idiotic thing to say. It's obvious this person isn't aware of the fact that not all sedevacantists hold the same opinion of the SSPX.
Man, what a stupid reviewer. I feel as though my IQ was lowered slightly from having had the displeasure of reading such scandalously embarrassing rubbish.
Topic: Dimond Brothers Exposed in Book (Read 6211 times)