Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?

Martin Luther remained a Catholic till his bitter end, per Stubborn?
1 (3.1%)
Martin Luther was a non Catholic when he manifested his heresy publicly?
21 (65.6%)
Martin Luther was still a Catholic until the time he was excommunicated by name in 1521 and then ceased being a Catholic at that time?
4 (12.5%)
I’m not sure.
6 (18.8%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Author Topic: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?  (Read 7155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4750
  • Reputation: +2897/-667
  • Gender: Male
Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
« Reply #60 on: October 04, 2024, 03:38:25 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • QVD, you are just as "stubborn" as Stubborn, except the completely opposite.  You refuse to admit the truth in potential/in theory, while he continues to refuse to admit the truth in actual/in practical terms.

    So, yes, both of you keep talking past one another.  Both of you refuse to make distinctions.

    I'd say it's more of a tragedy than a comedy at this point.

    I’m not quite sure if you didn’t read my post or you’re just assuming that I don’t accept the potentiality of a former member of the Catholic Church to once again join Her Mystical Body. It seems that you try to find any fault (many times nonexistent ones, as in this case) just to argue with me.

    Of course I believe in the potential ability of a heretic to regain his membership in the Church. I’ve stated this numerous times, why do you keep insisting that I don’t believe that or don’t see the distinction? What I absolutely don’t accept is that the heretic be considered a “Catholic” or a member of the Church before his repentance. BTW: Using the word “theory” is very imprecise. Fortunately, Ladislaus corrected that for you.

    Stubborn erroneously believes that the heretic has never left the Church and is still a member of Her Mystical Body. This is not only false but it’s also possibly blasphemous.

    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #61 on: October 04, 2024, 07:00:49 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Stubborn erroneously believes that the heretic has never left the Church and is still a member of Her Mystical Body. This is not only false but it’s also possibly blasphemous.
    It's been explained to you but you have what is apparently an impenetrable wall that guards your error. Your means of escaping is to make it into some sort of joke.
    Quote
    "In one sense, the heretic, as well as you and others, may or may not believe he is a Catholic, that's "in one sense."

    In the other sense, if he was ever Catholic then the Church considers him a Catholic in mortal sin, one who needs to confess his sins and amend his life. That's "in the other sense." 

    Your Reply:
    Well, at least Stubborn makes sense of what you wrote, now you know you’re in trouble. :laugh1: title=laugh1
    A member of the Catholic Church is one of the Church Militant. Like the army deserter, when he deserts his post via heresy, schism, apostacy, he severed himself from the army, the Mystical Body. Yet the army, the Mystical Body still owns that member, that deserter, he is still one of theirs - and because he is still one of theirs, they are both after that deserter to get him to return - by force if necessary for the army, by guilty conscience for the Mystical Body. 

    Should the deserter ever return to the army, he will be punished for his crimes. Should he ever return to the Mystical Body, he will be a rejoined member with the Mystical Body, no longer severed, he will be forgiven for his sins through the sacrament of penance, then he again has access to all the benefits exclusive to all members.

     in both cases, the deserter, run tho he may, could not escape the fact that he still belonged to the army / still belonged to the Mystical Body, which is why a penitent heretic on his deathbed, unlike non-Catholics, can still receive the sacrament same as every other member of the Mystical Body.     

    You probably consider this blasphemous.

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #62 on: October 04, 2024, 08:16:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's been explained to you but you have what is apparently an impenetrable wall that guards your error. Your means of escaping is to make it into some sort of joke.A member of the Catholic Church is one of the Church Militant. Like the army deserter, when he deserts his post via heresy, schism, apostacy, he severed himself from the army, the Mystical Body. Yet the army, the Mystical Body still owns that member, that deserter, he is still one of theirs - and because he is still one of theirs, they are both after that deserter to get him to return - by force if necessary for the army, by guilty conscience for the Mystical Body. 

    Should the deserter ever return to the army, he will be punished for his crimes. Should he ever return to the Mystical Body, he will be a rejoined member with the Mystical Body, no longer severed, he will be forgiven for his sins through the sacrament of penance, then he again has access to all the benefits exclusive to all members.

     in both cases, the deserter, run tho he may, could not escape the fact that he still belonged to the army / still belonged to the Mystical Body, which is why a penitent heretic on his deathbed, unlike non-Catholics, can still receive the sacrament same as every other member of the Mystical Body.     

    You probably consider this blasphemous.

    Is your so called “deserter” an “actual” member of the Catholic Church for the crime of heresy or is he just “potentially” a member (a former member who only has the potential to rejoin the Mystical Body)?
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6791
    • Reputation: +3468/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #63 on: October 04, 2024, 08:46:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's been explained to you but you have what is apparently an impenetrable wall that guards your error. Your means of escaping is to make it into some sort of joke.A member of the Catholic Church is one of the Church Militant. Like the army deserter, when he deserts his post via heresy, schism, apostacy, he severed himself from the army, the Mystical Body. Yet the army, the Mystical Body still owns that member, that deserter, he is still one of theirs - and because he is still one of theirs, they are both after that deserter to get him to return - by force if necessary for the army, by guilty conscience for the Mystical Body. 

    Should the deserter ever return to the army, he will be punished for his crimes. Should he ever return to the Mystical Body, he will be a rejoined member with the Mystical Body, no longer severed, he will be forgiven for his sins through the sacrament of penance, then he again has access to all the benefits exclusive to all members.

     in both cases, the deserter, run tho he may, could not escape the fact that he still belonged to the army / still belonged to the Mystical Body, which is why a penitent heretic on his deathbed, unlike non-Catholics, can still receive the sacrament same as every other member of the Mystical Body.     

    You probably consider this blasphemous.

    I agree with your stance, but could you explain the difference between a baptized heretic, and, say, a protestant, when it comes to confession/penance and readmittance to the sacraments? That still isn't clear to me. By the definition of those, such as QvD, who believe that a baptized Catholic turned heretic is no longer Catholic, if they are no longer Catholic, that should put them on the same footing as any other non-Catholic, such as a protestant, muslim, hindu or whatever.

    And yet a baptized Catholic can be reconciled with the Church, while the other non-Catholics (protestant, hindu, muslim, etc.) cannot be reconciled.  Can you explain the distinction? Thanks! (Perhaps you have explained it already and I missed it). 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12710
    • Reputation: +8094/-2499
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #64 on: October 04, 2024, 09:24:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    It's been explained to you but you have what is apparently an impenetrable wall that guards your error.
    :facepalm:  Stubborn, all you are doing is arguing for one-side of the coin.  You are hyper focused on getting everyone to agree that side A is "heads", while you completely ignore the opposite side of the coin.  At this point, you are either insane or you are trolling or you are so self-absorbed that you don't care what anyone else says.


    Your point is correct, but it's not 100% correct.  


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #65 on: October 04, 2024, 09:55:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I agree with your stance, but could you explain the difference between a baptized heretic, and, say, a protestant, when it comes to confession/penance and readmittance to the sacraments? That still isn't clear to me. By the definition of those, such as QvD, who believe that a baptized Catholic turned heretic is no longer Catholic, if they are no longer Catholic, that should put them on the same footing as any other non-Catholic, such as a protestant, muslim, hindu or whatever.

    And yet a baptized Catholic can be reconciled with the Church, while the other non-Catholics (protestant, hindu, muslim, etc.) cannot be reconciled.  Can you explain the distinction? Thanks! (Perhaps you have explained it already and I missed it).
    It all has to do with the faith, specifically, whether or not one has ever had the Catholic faith but no longer does, if so, then he was "once a Catholic."

    St. Thomas says that baptism without the faith is of no value, this is why we must both, be baptized and have the faith in order to receive the sacraments because the Church only administers her sacrament to Catholics, in this discussion all those who have never had the Catholic faith are excluded.

    To be reconciled, one must necessarily  have previously been "conciled," this leaves all those who've never had the Catholic faith out.  

    I used the army soldier for an example, because "once in the army, always in the army," at least until they discharge him from the army. The difference is the Church never discharges anyone. She is always there nurturing her children and waiting for sinners to repent. 

    While it is certainly true that we are free to "sever" all ties with our mother, and hate her and become heretical idiots against her, unlike prots, that does not mean that she is not or never was our mother. She was our mother when we had the Catholic faith, she will remain our mother no matter what.

    PPXII says:
    "22. Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or  been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.....It follows that those are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit."

    The underlined tells us what a Catholic is. Whoever has been baptized and professed the true faith is a Catholic, always will be even if they "separate themselves from the unity of the Body," they will not separate themselves from the Body, they will still be a Catholic *to the Church,* maybe not to you and I, but to the Church they will, even if they do not want to be, even if they convert to Hinduism and tell everyone they are no longer Catholic.....because should they ever choose to repent, the sacrament of penance is there waiting for them.

    The rest of PPXII quote tells us that through sin that we can separate ourselves from the unity of the body, not from the Mystical Body - from the *unity* of the Mystical Body. Which is of course what happens when one loses the faith and/or preaches heresies. PPXII goes on to include those excluded from that same unity of the Mystical Body by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.  
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #66 on: October 04, 2024, 10:02:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :facepalm:  Stubborn, all you are doing is arguing for one-side of the coin.  You are hyper focused on getting everyone to agree that side A is "heads", while you completely ignore the opposite side of the coin.  At this point, you are either insane or you are trolling or you are so self-absorbed that you don't care what anyone else says.


    Your point is correct, but it's not 100% correct. 
    :facepalm: Pax, there is nothing so complicated about this that only those with your high intelligence level are able to comprehend it. 
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #67 on: October 04, 2024, 10:10:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :facepalm: Pax, there is nothing so complicated about this that only those with your high intelligence level are able to comprehend it.


    Then answer this question that I posted above:

    Is your so called “deserter” an “actual” member of the Catholic Church for the crime of heresy or is he just “potentially” a member (a former member who only has the potential to rejoin the Mystical Body)?
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #68 on: October 04, 2024, 10:44:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Then answer this question that I posted above:

    Is your so called “deserter” an “actual” member of the Catholic Church for the crime of heresy or is he just “potentially” a member (a former member who only has the potential to rejoin the Mystical Body)?
    I'll do more than you do and answer the question, with a question for you to answer.

    Is the deserter actually an army man for the crime of desertion or is he just “potentially” an army man (a former army man who only has the potential to rejoin the army)?
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12710
    • Reputation: +8094/-2499
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #69 on: October 04, 2024, 10:58:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    :facepalm: title=facepalm Pax, there is nothing so complicated about this that only those with your high intelligence level are able to comprehend it. 
    There's a fair bit of the sin of uncharitableness when a person refuses to see another's point of view.  

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #70 on: October 04, 2024, 11:00:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's a fair bit of the sin of uncharitableness when a person refuses to see another's point of view. 
    It's one thing to see it, which I do, it's another thing to agree with it, which I don't.
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #71 on: October 04, 2024, 11:10:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It all has to do with the faith, specifically, whether or not one has ever had the Catholic faith but no longer does, if so, then he was "once a Catholic."

    St. Thomas says that baptism without the faith is of no value, this is why we must both, be baptized and have the faith in order to receive the sacraments because the Church only administers her sacrament to Catholics, in this discussion all those who have never had the Catholic faith are excluded.

    To be reconciled, one must necessarily  have previously been "conciled," this leaves all those who've never had the Catholic faith out. 

    I used the army soldier for an example, because "once in the army, always in the army," at least until they discharge him from the army. The difference is the Church never discharges anyone. She is always there nurturing her children and waiting for sinners to repent. 

    While it is certainly true that we are free to "sever" all ties with our mother, and hate her and become heretical idiots against her, unlike prots, that does not mean that she is not or never was our mother. She was our mother when we had the Catholic faith, she will remain our mother no matter what.

    PPXII says:
    "22. Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or  been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.....It follows that those are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit."



    The underlined tells us what a Catholic is. Whoever has been baptized and professed (NO! The word is “profess”. Present tense NOT past tense “professed”  :facepalm:the true faith is a Catholic, always will be even if they "separate themselves from the unity of the Body," they will not separate themselves from the Body, they will still be a Catholic *to the Church,* maybe not to you and I, but to the Church they will, even if they do not want to be, even if they convert to Hinduism and tell everyone they are no longer Catholic.....because should they ever choose to repent, the sacrament of penance is there waiting for them.

     (What total garbage! You now try to twist the pope’s words by saying that he means one can: “separate themselves from the unity of the Body, they will not separate themselves from the body”. You try to make a distinction when there isn’t one which is demonstrated in the pope’s next paragraph. :facepalm:)

    The rest of PPXII quote tells us that through sin that we can separate ourselves from the unity of the body, not from the Mystical Body - from the *unity* of the Mystical Body. Which is of course what happens when one loses the faith and/or preaches heresies. PPXII goes on to include those excluded from that same unity of the Mystical Body by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. 


    That is NOT what the pope is saying! Here is the paragraph you conveniently left out:

    Nor must one imagine that the Body of the Church, just because it bears the name of Christ, is made up during the days of its earthly pilgrimage only of members conspicuous for their holiness, or that it consists only of those whom God has predestined to eternal happiness. It is owing to the Savior's infinite mercy that place is allowed in His Mystical Body here below for those whom, of old, He did not exclude from the banquet.[20] For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy. Men may lose charity and divine grace through sin, thus becoming incapable of supernatural merit, and yet not be deprived of all life if they hold fast to faith and Christian hope, and if, illumined from above, they are spurred on by the interior promptings of the Holy Spirit to salutary fear and are moved to prayer and penance for their sins.


    He contradicts your HETERODOX garbage right in the next paragraph! :facepalm:


    My comments above are in red.
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4750
    • Reputation: +2897/-667
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #72 on: October 04, 2024, 11:20:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'll do more than you do and answer the question, with a question for you to answer.

    Is the deserter actually an army man for the crime of desertion or is he just “potentially” an army man (a former army man who only has the potential to rejoin the army)?

    I have no idea, it’s your analogy not mine, I just used your term “deserter”.

    I know why you won’t answer the question, because you are trapped. :laugh1: But you’ll just obfuscate like you always do. 
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4154
    • Reputation: +2435/-528
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #73 on: October 04, 2024, 11:25:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • PPXII goes on to include those excluded from that same unity of the Mystical Body by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. 
    .

    And isn't this exactly what happened to Martin Luther when he was excommunicated? So he became excluded from the unity of the Mystical Body.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14895
    • Reputation: +6183/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Did Martin Luther remain a Catholic till his bitter end?
    « Reply #74 on: October 04, 2024, 12:26:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • (NO! The word is “profess”. Present tense NOT past tense “professed”  :facepalm: title=facepalm)
    Reading comprehension is another one of your weaknesses, I see. I was referring to what he said in the past tense as it would apply to your loss of faith then repentance.

    Quote
    (What total garbage! You now try to twist the pope’s words by saying that he means one can: “separate themselves from the unity of the Body, they will not separate themselves from the body”. You try to make a distinction when there isn’t one which is demonstrated in the pope’s next paragraph. :facepalm: title=facepalm)
    I quoted his words, I did not twist them. There is a distinction between the body and the unity of that body whether you choose to accept it or not.

    Quote
    That is NOT what the pope is saying! Here is the paragraph you conveniently left out:

    Nor must one imagine that the Body of the Church, just because it bears the name of Christ, is made up during the days of its earthly pilgrimage only of members conspicuous for their holiness, or that it consists only of those whom God has predestined to eternal happiness. It is owing to the Savior's infinite mercy that place is allowed in His Mystical Body here below for those whom, of old, He did not exclude from the banquet.[20] For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy. Men may lose charity and divine grace through sin, thus becoming incapable of supernatural merit, and yet not be deprived of all life if they hold fast to faith and Christian hope, and if, illumined from above, they are spurred on by the interior promptings of the Holy Spirit to salutary fear and are moved to prayer and penance for their sins.


    He contradicts your HETERODOX garbage right in the next paragraph! :facepalm: title=facepalm
    Now here he says "the body," here he does not say the "unity of the body" - wow, you are really sharp.:facepalm:

    And yet, severed from the body of the Church, the penitent heretic, unlike non-Catholics, can still receive the Last Sacraments, and/or the sacrament of penance, then the other sacraments. Question: How is this possible if separated from the Body? Answer: See the army man example. Again. 
    Quote
    My comments above are in red.
    IMO, a very good definition for "excommunication" is "to separate from the unity of the Body." One can separate themselves by  grave sin, or by the legitimate authority for grave faults committed. 

    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse