I’m sorry, but how does me adding the link initially, or after the fact, remedy your doctrinal deficiencies?
So far as I can tell, you are just here emoting today.
7-8 posts on 3 different threads, but only whining, without making any doctrinal arguments anywhere.
Must be that time of the month?
LOL...
Feel free to demonstrate that I am just here emoting. My first post was an excellent article about unity. Is that not doctrinal in your world? I posted in Matthew's vax poll and the one questioning the possible inferiority of blacks. Please present the evidence that my comments were merely emoting. Thank you.
Nothing like getting personal, even making allusions to femininity, etc., all the while pretending I am the one with supposed deficiencies.
If you don't see how adding a link after the fact (and after I had replied) in support of your own brief, utterly non-doctrinal reply, while simultaneously chastising me for not being sufficiently doctrinal (in your lofty opinion), is rank hypocrisy, I cannot help you. Cheers.