http://www.christorchaos.com/DayThreeofFrancisTheLayPope.htmlDay Three of Francis The Lay Pope
by Thomas A. Droleskey
This will be a short article.
I made a serious error when I said to Sharon on Wednesday afternoon as Francis The Talking Apostate made his first appearance on the balcony of the Basilica of Saint Peter.
What was this error?
It was in saying, "This man looks befuddled."
Wrong.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis is not befuddled. He is a revolutionary who knows precisely what he is doing, and he is doing it with lightning speed.
Although he has been the sixth in the line of false conciliar "popes" for about sixty hours as of this writing, he has moved with great speed to further "reform" the whole nature of what the conciliarists refer to as the "Petrine Ministry" as he has ditched the mozzetta, cast off his papal stole until just before he gave a blessing after first asking "the people" to pray for him, staged Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service as he face his brother "apostates" in the conciliar college of "cardinals," thus breaking with Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's example of staging that travesty ad oriendum in the Sistine Chapel, preached at a lectern rather than sitting, permitting the "cardinals" to greet him as he stood up to shake their hands as though a true pope, which he believes himself to be, is an equal with his "cardinals," demanded that his "cardinals" wear black cassocks instead of their scarlet ones at his audience yesterday, Friday, March 15, 2013, and ridden a minibus with the "cardinals," thus again demonstrating that he is just one among equals.That's a whole lot of work in sixty hours.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis is a true conciliar revolutionary, differing with Ratzinger/Benedict on some important points no matter however much they agree on the fundamentals of conciliarism.
One of the times the ecuмaniac who is currently the smiling, friendly, seemingly humble director of the Occupy Vatican Movement made clear his disagreement with his predecessor was in 2005 when the former Professor Ratzinger gave a lecture on Mohammedanism at Regensburg University, at which he had taught for a time early in his priestly career:
In 2005, then Pope Benedict, while quoting from an obscure medieval text, declared that the Prophet Mohammed, founder of the Islamic faith, was "evil and inhuman", enraging the Muslim population and causing attacks on churches throughout the world before an apology was issued.
Reacting within days to the statements, speaking through a spokesman to Newsweek Argentina, then Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio declared his "unhappiness" with the statements, made at the University of Regensburg in Germany, and encouraged many of his subordinates with the Church to do the same.
"Pope Benedict's statement don't reflect my own opinions", the then Archbishop of Buenos Aires declared. "These statements will serve to destroy in 20 seconds the careful construction of a relationship with Islam that Pope John Paul II built over the last twenty years".
The Vatican reacted quickly, removing one subordinate, Joaquín Piña the Archbishop of Puerto Iguazú from his post within four days of his making similar statements to the Argentine national media, sending a clear statement to Cardinal Bergoglio that he would be next should he choose to persist.
Reacting to the threats from Rome, Cardinal Bergoglio cancelled his plans to fly to Rome, choosing to boycott the second synod that Pope Benedict had called during his tenure as pontiff.
"The only thing that didn't happen to Bergoglio was being removed from his post", wrote investigative journalist Horacio Verbitsky in his column in left-wing daily newspaper Página/24. "The Vatican was very quick to react,"
Cristina Kirchner, the Argentina president, stated at the time that such diatribes were "dangerous for everyone". (Lay Pope Francis' run-in with Benedict XVI over the Prophet Mohammed - Telegraph.)
There is really no mystery to this whatsoever as Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis is a religious indifferentist of the first order, a man who moves freely in and out of one temple of false worship after another. He will not countenance any criticism of any false religion, including his own false religion of conciliarism, as to do so would be to "uncharitable" and offend the tender sensibilities of those who adhere to such false religions. Bergoglio/Francis is all about "feelings" and "appearance" when it comes to "bridging differences," which is why he would find Hillaire Belloc's The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed to be completely unacceptable to him.
Speaking of "bridging differences," the man who gave us the Pinocchio "Mass" (which contains footage of that 2011 youth service in Buenos Aires, Argentina, that was not included in the link provided two days ago now) and who co-authored book with Jєωιѕн Rabbi (these two links were found at Novus Ordo Wire), Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, blasphemed the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity yesterday when he said:
The cardinals' sense of openness and mutual friendship helped the Holy Spirit do its part during the conclave, he said.
One "curiosity," the pope noted, is that the Holy Spirit is a sort of "apostle of Babel" that creates the differences in the church.
But on the other hand, he said, it's the same Holy Spirit that "unites these differences, not in equality but in harmony," by focusing everyone's different gifts on the adoration of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. (Don't give in to pessimism, courageously share Gospel.)
Apostle of Babel?
Would you want to rethink that one, Frank?
Apostle of Babel?
"Picky, picky," some might say. "Our beloved, humble pope was trying say that there are a diversity of talents apportioned by God the Holy Ghost to each member of the People of God, that these differences actually build harmony. That's all he was saying. Nothing more."
Ah, I reply, words matter. They matter a lot. Imprecision of language matters a lot, especially when one is speaking of the Three Persons of the Most Blessed Trinity.
The Towel of Babel refers to the pride that was possessed by mankind after the Great Flood as He chose to confound their pride in speaking but a single language by confusing them with a multiplicity of languages so that they could understand each other:
[1] And the earth was of one tongue, and of the same speech. [2] And when they removed from the east, they found a plain in the land of Sennaar, and dwelt in it. [3] And each one said to his neighbour: Come, let us make brick, and bake them with fire. And they had brick instead of stones, and slime instead of mortar. [4] And they said: Come, let us make a city and a tower, the top whereof may reach to heaven: and let us make our name famous before we be scattered abroad into all lands. [5] And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of Adam were building.
[6] And he said: Behold, it is one people, and all have one tongue: and they have begun to do this, neither will they leave off from their designs, till they accomplish them in deed. [7] Come ye, therefore, let us go down, and there confound their tongue, that they may not understand one another's speech. [8] And so the Lord scattered them from that place into all lands, and they ceased to build the city. [9] And therefore the name thereof was called Babel, because there the language of the whole earth was confounded: and from thence the Lord scattered them abroad upon the face of all countries. [10] These are the generations of Sem: Sem was a hundred years old when he begot Arphaxad, two years after the flood. (Genesis 11: 1-9.)
The diversity of given to us by God the Holy Ghost is not meant to confuse us in any way but to unite us in the common language of the Catholic Faith as we build up the supporting ligaments of the Mystical Body of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ with the particular gifts that we have been given:
[1] I BESEECH you therefore, brethren, by the mercy of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing unto God, your reasonable service. [2] And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the acceptable, and the perfect will of God. [3] For I say, by the grace that is given me, to all that are among you, not to be more wise than it behoveth to be wise, but to be wise unto sobriety, and according as God hath divided to every one the measure of faith. [4] For as in one body we have many members, but all the members have not the same office: [5] So we being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
[6] And having different gifts, according to the grace that is given us, either prophecy, to be used according to the rule of faith; [7] Or ministry, in ministering; or he that teacheth, in doctrine; [8] He that exhorteth, in exhorting; he that giveth, with simplicity; he that ruleth, with carefulness; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness. [9] Let love be without dissimulation. Hating that which is evil, cleaving to that which is good. [10] Loving one another with the charity of brotherhood, with honour preventing one another.
[11] In carefulness not slothful. In spirit fervent. Serving the Lord. [12] Rejoicing in hope. Patient in tribulation. Instant in prayer. [13] Communicating to the necessities of the saints. Pursuing hospitality. [14] Bless them that persecute you: bless, and curse not. [15] Rejoice with them that rejoice; weep with them that weep.
[16] Being of one mind one towards another. Not minding high things, but consenting to the humble. Be not wise in your own conceits. [17] To no man rendering evil for evil. Providing good things, not only in the sight of God, but also in the sight of all men. [18] If it be possible, as much as is in you, have peace with all men. [19] Revenge not yourselves, my dearly beloved; but give place unto wrath, for it is written: Revenge is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord. [20] But if thy enemy be hungry, give him to eat; if he thirst, give him to drink. For, doing this, thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head.
[21] Be not overcome by evil, but overcome evil by good. (Romans 12: 1-21.)
It matters not what Francis the Lay Pope meant to say.
What matters is what he said.
The Tower of Babel has nothing to do with the diversity of distinctive gifts apportioned us by God the Holy Ghost.
Ah, we can expect a lot this during Francis the Lay Pope's time as the "citizen pope" before he retires in peace to the slums outside of Buenos Aires (which are indeed truly, truly wretched and coexist within miles of very posh, expensive areas). The "citizen pope" speaks extemporaneously, which means that there will be a lot of spontaneous material heresy in what he say as well the simple, garden-variety conciliar heresy that flows so freely easily from his lips and with his blasphemous and sacrilegious deeds.
Then again, Francis the Lay Pope (I will use a variety of titles with which to address him) is but a figure of Antichrist, a man who conditioning Catholics attached to the conciliar structures to get used to "informality" and "spontaneity" when discussing the Faith and to treat all religions with the respect he believes that they deserve as each is pleasing to the true God of Divine Revelation, with is why the lords of ʝʊdɛօ-Masonry are tripping all over themselves about him:
Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s selection as Pope Francis has come as a welcome surprise for the Jєωιѕн community and the future of Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations.
Rabbi Noam E. Marans, director of interreligious and intergroup relations for the American Jєωιѕн Committee, said on Thursday that the future of Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations should be in good hands with Pope Francis at the helm.
“The surprise for Jєωιѕн people and people paying attention to Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations was all prognostication and the concerns do not seem to have come true,” he said. “We have been given arguably the most positive result one could want in terms of Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations.”
Bergoglio, who finished runner-up to Pope Benedict XVI eight years ago, represents the first time a pope has not emanated from Europe. He is also the first Jesuit to be selected pope.
Marans said that, more than ever, the Jєωιѕн community’s relationship with Latinos in the U.S. and abroad needs to be strengthened during Pope Francis’ reign as pope.
“The Latino population has grown dramatically in the U.S. and it behooves us as a Jєωιѕн community to work very hard on that relationship,” Marans said. “This was a real shot in the arm of empowerment not just to Latinos in the U.S. who embrace Catholicism, but also to Latinos throughout the world and the Jєωιѕн community needs to pay attention.” (Rabbi Praises Lay Pope Francis Selection As A ‘Most Positive Result'. I have been unsuccessful in my efforts to find any remarks that Jorge Mario "Cardinal" Bergoglio might have made during the storm created by Bishop Williamson's remarks that aired on Swedish television on January 21, 2009, at a time when Bishop Williamson was the rector of the Society of Saint Pius X's seminary in Argentina. Maybe Bergoglio said nothing? My efforts to find such remarks, if they were made and still exist in cyberspace, continue.)
"We have been given arguably the most positive result one could want in terms of Catholic-Jєωιѕн relations.”
The "we" that Rabbi Marans is referring to even though he does not realize it consists of the devil and his minions. They are indeed most pleased at what is to them "arguably the most positive result one could want in terms" of further eroding what little is left of the sensus Catholicus in the minds, hearts and souls of conciliar Catholics and to prepare the way for the coming of Antichrist and the One World Ecuмenical Church. They certainly got their "positive result" in the "lay pope" of the moment.
Why is Jorge Mario Bergoglio a "lay pope?
Well, I provided a link yesterday to Father Kevin Vaillancourt's "Father" or Not? An earlier study had been undertaken by a former religious sister, Maureen Day, who wrote to Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X in 1995 with her conclusions, which are appended below for your consideration. It is pretty certain, at least to me, that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, having been "installed" by the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Argentina, Archbishop Ramón José Castellano, on December 13, 1969, was installed as a conciliar presbyter as the ordinal for the conciliar rite of presbyteral installation was issued in 1968 and came into use in 1969. Archbishop Castellano, who was a true bishop, most likely used that invalid ordinary even though there were some true bishops back in those early years who simply refused to use to conciliar rite of "priestly ordination" as they realized that it was problematic, if not invalid on its face.
We are on the cusp of Passion Sunday and the Passion Week that follows it.
Remember, that this is a time for suffering. Suffer well as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, remembering, especially during this Lent, to pray as many Rosaries each day as your state-in-life permits.
Lift high the Cross!
Topic: Day Three of Francis The Lay Pope (Read 1653 times)