Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5

Author Topic: Dangerous Monks!  (Read 1107 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sedevacantist3

Re: Dangerous Monks!
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2026, 02:37:36 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on July 17, 2026, 05:22:27 PM
So THAT's how you pronounce "sedevacantism".  I had it wrong all these years.

Unforunately, +Roy appears to be proceeding with grave the grave scandal of consecrating the Papa Stronsay criminal.

God must be allowing this to discredit +Roy for all his other clown-foolery.

I do not have permission to reveal what I was told, but it's very very bad, far worse than the exorcisms (which are bad enough) ... and +Roy has been informed about it all and +Roy insists upon proceeding anyway, probably because he has these delusions of being the sedevacantist pope to emerge from his "council".
Not informed in this matter, is there solid evidence against this criminal,
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Dangerous Monks!
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2026, 06:53:05 PM »
Quote from: sedevacantist3 on July 18, 2026, 02:37:36 PM
Not informed in this matter, is there solid evidence against this criminal,

Certainly ... though the reported activity wasn't technically illegal, but gravely immortal.  If you knew the identities of those who reported this activity, you would not doubt it, as they're extremely credible.
Logged

Offline Kazimierz

Re: Dangerous Monks!
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2026, 10:18:52 PM »
Prevost....perhaps Sideshow Bob? 

Logged

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Dangerous Monks!
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2026, 10:43:03 AM »
Quote from: sedevacantist3 on July 18, 2026, 02:37:36 PM
Not informed in this matter, is there solid evidence against this criminal,

Related:
Long article from a NZ paper, and they mention :  "Friends of St. Albans". The monks used this name to fool the N.O. bishop to purchase a church. But the SSPX / +W used this tactic too.
Note: They word "Mary" is actually Fr. Michael Mary.

https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/360474048/i-believed-what-they-shared-me-concern-mounts-controversial-catholic-sect-expands
"...Anglican Bishop Peter Carrell says he had no idea they were selling to the Sons until it was too late. The sale was brokered by a lawyer purportedly acting for a soon-to-be trust called “friends of St Albans” and did not disclose a connection to the Sons, he says.

The Sons spokesperson says they did this because they believed the Anglicans would block the deal..."

Logged

Offline trento

Re: Dangerous Monks!
« Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 01:45:04 AM »
Quote from: Twice dyed on July 19, 2026, 10:43:03 AM
Related:
Long article from a NZ paper, and they mention :  "Friends of St. Albans". The monks used this name to fool the N.O. bishop to purchase a church. But the SSPX / +W used this tactic too.
Note: They word "Mary" is actually Fr. Michael Mary.

https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/360474048/i-believed-what-they-shared-me-concern-mounts-controversial-catholic-sect-expands
"...Anglican Bishop Peter Carrell says he had no idea they were selling to the Sons until it was too late. The sale was brokered by a lawyer purportedly acting for a soon-to-be trust called “friends of St Albans” and did not disclose a connection to the Sons, he says.

The Sons spokesperson says they did this because they believed the Anglicans would block the deal..."
Can you post the entire article?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
« previous next »