http://www.christorchaos.com/SomeoneWasKilledToKeepJ.R.Alive.html
The lies that were told by Fathers Annibale Bugnini, C.M., and Ferdinando Antontelli, O.F.M., in the 1950s gave us unprecedented and most radical changes in the Holy Week ceremonies that started to accustom Catholics to ceaseless change as an ordinary feature of the liturgical life of the Catholic Church, climaxing in the Trojan Horse that was the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service that, no matter how many times the conciliarists to "fix it," will always be an instrument of innovation and experimentation as it was designed to be precisely that from the moment Bugnini and Antonelli began their plans for the "Mass of the Future."
How could a change in Holy Week, which ceremonies were not attended by enormous numbers of Catholics, be the cause of "starting to accustom Catholics to ceaseless change as an ordinary feature of the liturgical life of the Catholic Church?"
You must be aware of the number of changes starting in 1951 - 1958. Was not the Easter Vigil attended by an enormous amount of Catholics? Were not all Catholics made aware of this change? The starting starts when it starts, under Bugnini and Antonelli and ends where the Novus Ordo is now, or rather never ends until God ends it.
http://www.fathercekada.com/2009/04/10/bugninis-51-easter-vigil-first-step-to-the-novus-ordo/
In February 1951, Holy See issued a decree permitting, experimentally and for period of one year, the celebration of the Easter Vigil at night Holy Saturday. Once again, merely allowing a change of time would not have been particularly objectionable.
But Bugnini and company, who since 1948 controlled the Vatican commission for liturgical reform, seized the occasion to introduce changes into the rites themselves. So secret was the work of his commission on this project, Bugnini said, “that the publication of the Renewed Order for Holy Saturday at the beginning of March 1951 caught even the officials of the Congregation of Rites by surprise.” (Annibale Bugnini, La Riforma Liturgica: 1948–1975 [Rome: CLV 1983], 25)
The 1951 Easter Vigil was the first crack the modernists had at destroying the liturgy, and they made the most of it.
The surprise of Bugnini’s (theoretical) superiors seems be reflected in the content of decree by which the Congregation promulgated the Renewed Order; it is mainly devoted to discussing the change of time, and mentions, almost as an afterthought, “the rubrics that follow.” (See SC Rites Decree Dominicae Resurrectionis Vigiliam, 9 February 1951, AAS 43 [1951], 128–9.)
The changes in 1955 were twelve.
(1) The blessing prayers for the Easter fire are reduced from three to one.
(2) A new ceremony for inscribing and blessing the Paschal candle was introduced.
(3) The “reed” or triple candle (richly symbolic of the Trinity and the Incarnation) used to bring the Easter fire into the church was abolished.
(4) The clergy and people are supposed to carry candles.
(5) The magnificent Old Testament prophecies telling the whole story of Redemption are reduced in number from twelve to four. (So much for giving Scripture back to the people…)
(6) The celebrant sits and listens to the readings. The rubrics imply that these may be proclaimed in the vernacular.
(7) The celebrant chants the collects at the sedilia, rather than at the altar. (Again, think Novus Ordo-style president’s chair.)
(8) A pause for prayer is introduced after Flectamus genua (Let us kneel) in the orations.
(9) The baptismal water is blessed in the sanctuary facing the people (rather than in the baptistery), and carried to the baptistery in a tub.
(10) The Litany of the Saints is divided into two and abbreviated.
(11) All those present recite a “Renewal of Baptismal Vows” in the vernacular — the first time the vernacular is explicitly permitted as an integral part of a liturgical rite.
(12) The Prayers at the Foot of the Altar are dropped in their entirety from the Mass, as is the Last Gospel.
Father Ahearn who is a very well respect SV does not adhere to the changes neither do others who left SSPV to become independent as they accept the Thuc-line consecrations. Neither do the SSPV. Neither do many independent Priests SV or not who studied the changes and who was behind them and where they led. I dare say neither would a well Pius XII were he aware of the motives behind the ones who made the changes and where those changes would lead.
When do the changes stop being cool if not the above?
1961/2?
1964?
1967?
1969?
Can you put a date on when the changes went from good to bad or okay to not okay? How about imprudent to reprehensible and impossible for a valid Pope to allow or promulgate?
The above obviously can be done under a valid Pope. But that does not make it the greatest thing that ever happened during the course of a papacy I am sure you will agree.
Were not the people and priests mind you, those who led the people, and bishops and cardinals and the Pope himself not getting used to the changes by 1958? These change became the norm until the Mass and Sacraments were destroyed. This cannot be denied by the objective observer.
Obviously these Priests are not stupid and more studied in the liturgy than CI posters though some will claim categorically, with no room for debate, that we should be stuck in 1958 rather than from 400 - 1954. Yes I'm aware what happened liturgically those years, things to increase devotion not things to be cut out or eliminated or would lead to the protestantization of the Mass.
Topic: Damned Lies (Read 5632 times)