Martin can't be trusted, but it's very clear that he was well connected, though probably not in a good way. He worked for Bea during V2 to dig up dirt on the various Council Fathers in order to leverage that against them. But he was certainly an insider. Much of what he says is undoubtedly true, but a fair bit of it is either made up or sensationalized / exaggerated (for book sales, ratings, etc.) and even for possible disinfo. He did in fact tie Fatima somehow to Russia + Ukraine a couple decades ago, so that part of it might be based on something real, though it could also be informed by knowledge of what was being planned by the Globalist Jєωs. I doubt that Our Lady mentioned Ukraine by name in the Third Secret.
But we don't need Martin to now that Russia will most likely kickoff the unravelling of this entire crisis by invading Western Europe. I personally find both Elena Aiello and Alois Irlmaier to be very credible, and they both agree on that. According to Irlmaier, however, the invasion is kicked off by the assassination of a "great one". Russia then retaliates by invading Europe. Could this be an assassination of Vladimir Putin? Evidently it takes place somewhere in or near the Balkans, and Russia's first target is to wipe Prague (the Golden City) off the map, which implies that the assassins were from Prague (Czech Republic). Though Putin doesn't stop there, which suggests EU/NATO sponsorship and involvement in the entire thing.
What's interesting is that to get to Prague (and Irlmaier does say it's a ground invasion), Russia would have to cut through the entire width of Ukraine and then through the southern (though narrowest) part of Poland. Does this imply that Russia does ultimately gain control / mastery over Ukraine? Hard to say. But evidently the attack happens so quickly with a massive blitzkrieg, that Irlmaier describe people sitting in a pub and then suddenly being surprised by seeing Russian soldiers out the window. Given how quickly information travels in this electronic age, that would certainly have to be the mother of all lightning attacks. So this suggests that there were already Russian troops all over Ukraine, and that they set out from there ... which would allow them to get to Prague and to Austria / Germany quickly enough to surprise the inhabitants there.
So Irlmaier says there are 3 spearheads in the attack, with one turning south, the other straight through, and a third north. At some point, the West turns the tide by unleashing some bizarre (Irlmaier calls it diabolical) weapon that destroys all living things (plans, human beings) but does not destroy property. He sees tanks continuing to move as the inhabitants inside are killed. Sounds like a neutron bomb, except that he says it's a greenish-yellow dust, and that the areas remain uninhabitable for some time. He describes them putting this stuff down all across Europe from the Black Sea to the North Sea to entirely cut off the Russian spearheads ... which are then able to be defeated in having been cut off form their supply lines. Interestingly, he sees Russia dropping a bomb near England that causes much of it to be submerged, along with the European coasts, and Russia has recently developed a "tsunami bomb" that would do precisely that ... and Irlmaier had no way to predict this. Irlmaier also talked about what he described as cigarette packs that people would stare intently at and would have moving colors. That could easily describe people and their cell phones, but he had no reference to understand this, so he described those the best he could.
Topic: Consecration of Russia - when and how? (Read 1438 times)