Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Consecration LiveStream  (Read 3489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #15 on: March 26, 2022, 09:15:13 AM »
We could even throw in there St. Malachy's prophecy concerning the men who would be papal claimants until the Second Coming, which, may end with Francis. I personally think it's telling us Popes/papal claimants until the end of the age, since no one knows when the end will be but the Father. But, it's worth considering too.


Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #16 on: March 26, 2022, 09:32:05 AM »
I actually think that most of the bad stuff will happen in 2029 because because Our Lady requested the consecration in 1929 and then in 1931 Our Lord complained to Sister Lucy that it was like with the Kings of France (who were deposed 100 years to the day that the Sacred Heart of Jesus asked them to consecrate France to him).

Another interesting thing in 1929 was the Lateran Treaty.  Dimond Brothers say that the 10 Kings (of Rome) mentioned in the Apocalypse are actually 10 Popes (who even if illegitimate were Kings of Rome in the sense of being rules of Vatican City under that treaty).  That's definitely an interesting angle.
The same timeline has been on my mind for a few years now. Either it's when the Chastisement kicks off, or, Antichrist, the true one not JPII, emerges and reigns until 2032-33, which is 2,000 years after Our Lord's death and resurrection. Aping Our Lord's 3 years of preaching in the world... It's possible that the Chastisement occurs in the next few years, followed by a peace wherein Antichrist comes preaching and reigns. But, God only knows.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2022, 10:09:23 AM »
We could even throw in there St. Malachy's prophecy concerning the men who would be papal claimants until the Second Coming, which, may end with Francis. I personally think it's telling us Popes/papal claimants until the end of the age, since no one knows when the end will be but the Father. But, it's worth considering too.



I struggle a bit understanding what they're saying.  They're claiming that Bergoglio will be the last (Anti-)Pope, and if we look at the prophecies 1,000 years from now, we'll see that he was the last (Anti-)Pope.  So the papacy will be extinuished?  I have a hard time believing that the papacy would end with a line of Antipopes.  There's way too much Catholic prophecy which indicates Triumph and Restoration of the Church after this apostasy that has been foretold, and Our Lady stated that Her Immaculate Heart will Triumph.  To make it fit, the Dimonds hold that the Fatima consecration was done by Pius XII.  But what Our Lady warned of in the Third Secret is the great apostasy "from the top", and her Triumph would presumably involve the restoration of the Church.  Even the book of Revelation refers to a generation of peace and the Church's glory before the emergence of Antichrist.  Dimonds somehow think that removing Stalin and therefore causing fewer Catholics to be killed by the Communists represents the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary?  This is the big "conversion" Our Lady promised, some nebulous reduction of the aggressiveness of the Soviets?  I think that's a insult to Our Blessed Mother, and I simply do not buy the Dimond narrative.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2022, 10:17:58 AM »
It's very clear that the Third Secret was about the Apostasy in the Church that would begin "at the top" sometime around 1960, with perhaps the mention of an evil/wicked Council.  There's a ton of evidence to back this up.  What happened in 1960 that would make the secret clearer?

But the V2 Papal Claimants read the Third Secret, and have bee covering it up.  This clearly indicates that these are not just some misguided men with "weak faith" but, rather, deliberate and malicious destroyers.  JP2 lied about its contents in 2000 and Ratzinger was involved in the coverup.

Re: Consecration LiveStream
« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2022, 10:19:13 AM »
I don't wholly buy it either, hence why I think that it may be interpreted as to the end of our time (age) rather than the end of all time.

It's even possible, based on their videos showing Bergoglio isn't even a "king of Rome", that there is a Pope yet to come that could be St. Malachy's "Peter the Roman", assuming that the papal pretenders are in fact those of his prophecy.

How fitting it would be for the last Pope to be Peter II