Author Topic: Communion with the accursed  (Read 3664 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stubborn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8244
  • Reputation: +2969/-551
  • Gender: Male
Re: Communion with the accursed
« Reply #285 on: December 11, 2017, 11:58:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The dogma is very clear Myrna, all I am telling Lastdays to do is to repeat a defined dogma - but he considers it heresy and me a heretic for asking him to repeat a defined dogma of the Catholic Church. I am not asking him to repeat a satanic spell or lyrics from a rock song - we are talking about a defined dogma!

    The man is in terrible need of prayers.
    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Lastdays

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +67/-114
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #286 on: December 11, 2017, 12:10:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do you see what I mean now that you've anathematized yourself again?

    What?!? And no judicial sentence? How quickly the ipso facto penalties fall upon those who oppose your heresies!
    Catholic Encyclopedia – Heresy, 1913: The Pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be Pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.


    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8244
    • Reputation: +2969/-551
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #287 on: December 11, 2017, 12:15:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not surprising that you still don't see anything.

    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Lastdays

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +67/-114
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #288 on: December 11, 2017, 12:15:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The dogma is very clear Myrna, all I am telling Lastdays to do is to repeat a defined dogma - but he considers it heresy and me a heretic for asking him to repeat a defined dogma of the Catholic Church.

    Sorry Stubborn, but your dogmas are not Catholic dogmas. Nice try though. Here, I guess I will have to show you the difference between Catholic dogma and your dogmas once again...

    This is Catholic dogma. Repeat it as often as possible...

    Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; *or* [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.

    This is one of your replacements for (the above) Catholic dogma...

    Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter will have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; *or* [if anyone says] that a notorious heretic is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is your other replacement...

    Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter will have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; *or* [if anyone says] that the Pope is not the Pope, let him be anathema.
    Catholic Encyclopedia – Heresy, 1913: The Pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be Pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8244
    • Reputation: +2969/-551
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #289 on: December 11, 2017, 12:19:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, no, no - I only wanted you to repeat a very short but pertinent part of the dogma, the part I bolded:

    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.
    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine


    Offline Lastdays

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +67/-114
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #290 on: December 11, 2017, 12:23:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, no, no - I only wanted you to repeat a very short but pertinent part of the dogma, the part I bolded:

    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is the pertinent part of the previous Catholic dogma I showed you. Repeat it as often as possible...

    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is one of your replacements for (the above) pertinent part of Catholic dogma...

    [if anyone says] that a notorious heretic is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is your other replacement...

    [if anyone says] that the Pope is not the Pope, let him be anathema
    Catholic Encyclopedia – Heresy, 1913: The Pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be Pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8244
    • Reputation: +2969/-551
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #291 on: December 11, 2017, 12:28:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just do yourself an eternal favor by doing as I asked - repeat over and over again, all day, non-stop until you believe it:
    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.

    You need to do this, you really do.
    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine

    Offline Lastdays

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 488
    • Reputation: +67/-114
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #292 on: December 11, 2017, 01:06:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just do yourself an eternal favor by doing as I asked - repeat over and over again, all day, non-stop until you believe it:
    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.

    You need to do this, you really do.
    This is the pertinent part of the previous Catholic dogma I showed you. Repeat it as often as possible...

    [if anyone says] that the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is one of your replacements for (the above) pertinent part of Catholic dogma...

    [if anyone says] that a notorious heretic is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy [over the whole Church]: let him be anathema.


    This is your other replacement...

    [if anyone says] that the Pope is not the Pope, let him be anathema
    Catholic Encyclopedia – Heresy, 1913: The Pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be Pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.


    Offline Stubborn

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8244
    • Reputation: +2969/-551
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Communion with the accursed
    « Reply #293 on: December 11, 2017, 02:22:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Surly you do not see that your lex orandi is completely corrupt - which is why you have no church, no pope and no hope of ever having a pope.

    I say that it is licit to resist the Roman Pontiff by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." St. Robert Bellarmine

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16