CathInfo.com

From your quote of your post that was included in the response:

Your responses on this discussion are a continuing begging of the question(s): a) is the NO a "Catholic rite," which, as your "3)" highlights, points to the question of whether Paul VI and the rest of them were popes who had to heeded and whose authority was not void per Paul IV's cuм Ex, and their rites could be treated as such (i.e, as void and non-Catholic).

Sure, if you assume Paul VI was not a heretic and a pope whose directives weren't void leaving his mouth or hand, and then make the next logical step from that ASSUMPTION, the NO is a Catholic rite . . . true, you'd be on solid ground.

But the coin is not in your cup - i.e., your begging on the questions hasn't been answered affirmatively, so you're still broke.

As has been explained repeatedly, the CE states a Catholic rite is nothing more that prayers and ceremonies approved for use in the Church, as the NOM was.


PS: Sede arguments are of no use here (Paul VI wasn’t pope; new rite is invalid), since Hewkonians cannot make use of them without departing from Lefebvre’s, and also because they rest upon no authoritative interpretations except those given them by sedes (not by the church) themselves.

Quote from: Jerome on Daniel

". . .And he shall crush the saints of the Most High, and will suppose himself to be able to alter times and laws." The Antichrist will wage war against the saints and will overcome them; and he shall exalt himself to such a height of arrogance (A) as to attempt changing the very laws of God and the sacred rites as well. He will also lift himself up against all that is called God, subjecting all religion to his own authority.

tertullian.org

https://www.cathinfo.com/the-sacred-catholic-liturgy-chant-prayers/vatican-council-says-there-will-be-shepherds-'usque-ad-consummationem-saeculi'/msg743306/#msg743306

And in either case, "it's a true, valid, God-given miracle", or "it's of Satanic origin", it gives us something to consider.  And, as I noted, anti-Catholic apologists could use the latter to debunk Lanciano, the liquefying blood of St Januarius, the miracle of the sun at Fatima, indeed, any miracle that, even by implication, asserts that Catholicism is true.

But in the end, our faith is not dependent upon miracles that took place after the time of the Apostles.