CathInfo.com

One child abused by any priest is one too many.

Yes, we all get this.  But we have to distinguish between the evil crime itself and Voris' agenda, and his contempt for Traditional Catholicism.  When they doxed Father Stafki's victim and produced a borderline-pornographic account of what transpired, they tipped their hand that they're not primarily concerned about the victims, but rather about their contempt for Traditional Catholicism.  In this last video from Voris, he didn't spend 10% of his rant on the crimes of Fr. Maillard or the alleged SSPX coverup (about which I know very little after watching the video).  He spent most of the video ranting against Traditional Catholicism and the hubris of thinking that the Tridentine Mass is better than the NOM.

They deliberately play these games of psychological association, trying to pain those who object to ANYTHING that Voris says or does in the context of one of these videos as "condoning pederasty".  It's like various accusers who claim "victim shaming" if someone doesn't believe every detail of their allegations, or those who play the race card by claiming racism if you have anything bad to say about a given Jєω or "Person of Color".  We have to be aware of these manipulation tactics and resist them.

Since when in Catholic Church history did ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs teach about morals, Jєωιѕн women teach about faith, divorced teach about marriage, and Protestants teach about the papacy?

Why do Catholics give these wolves in sheep's clothing a platform at all?

.

Yes, this is common sense. Before Vatican 2, someone as debauched and degenerate as Michael Voris would never have been given a platform to talk about anything of a religious nature. If such a person wanted to repent, he would have been told to devote the rest of his life to a hidden life of prayer and penance.

Maybe that's why Michael Voris hates traditional Catholicism so much, because he knows we don't approve of his shameless promotion of himself (well, most of us don't ).

Michael Voris is fake and gαy.

The person who thumbed this g down must be a pedophile themselves. 

... this is precisely what I was talking about, and the same thing Voris is doing.  You also made a statement about sedevacantism that someone may have been objecting to.  Not accepting everything in your post is not to be a pedophile or to condone pedophilia.  Or maybe the individual just doesn't like you.  This is the same tactic Voris uses.  I'm going to go on a 30-minute rant against Traditional Catholicism, while mentioning sex abuse for about 2-3 minutes of it.  But if you object to my 27 minutes of diatribe against Traditional Catholicism in general, that means you condone pedophilia, right?  You don't disagree with Voris' rants in favor of Jorge being the Catholic pope?  He would downthumb your post.