Yes, I did read that, and you're right, it is scandalous. I think the only reason it is accepted is because people are ignorant of Church teaching in the first place and fail to use their brains in the second place.
First I have to confess that I never did follow Medjugorje, so I'm relatively ignorant of the "locutions". But we have all identified false ecuмenism as one of the marks of the false church, thus also of false apparitions. It makes sense to me that other apparitions which endorse those we know to be false, must also be false. It would be nice if we could identify those which are false and why they must be false. But first Medjugorje. We need someone to argue the other side of this in order to cover all bases. Where are you, Cub?