I wrote this for another thread but it expanded beyond the concerns of that threadLover_of_Truth said:It appears, based upon what Tom Droleskey has written that Cekeda, Dolan and Sanborn are rather cultish. The una cuм deal is a pretty good way to keep them looked in. . .huh?
LoT, that is like saying that "being against Protestantism is a good way for the Catholic Church to keep people locked in and to steal their hard-earned money."
I have no doubt that Bishops Dolan and Sanborn may be cultish and creepy -- I don't know much about Bishop Sanborn except that he defends Bishop Dolan -- but that has nothing to do with a theological stance against the una cuм. If I were a priest I would tell my parishioners not to go to the una cuм, but I would not be running a cult. I would just be like any old Catholic priest who tells his flock not to worship at ѕуηαgσgυєs or with Protestants or at Buddhist temples, or with anti-Christ heresiarchs who pretend to be Pope.
If they do so, it is their own problem; if they try to get others to do so, after several warnings, I would have to ask them to leave since they are a danger to the flock. I wouldn't make anyone sign any contracts; I would just let them know that they should not be in communion with a heresiarch.
*****
But none of this has to do with our real problem which is an infected clergy. The Freemasons and those who serve them have always worked this way, they pretend to be against each other and play good-cop bad-cop. Think of Pacelli "exiling" Montini, or Montini then doing the same to Bugnini. Now you have Bishop Pivarunas vs. Bishop Dolan, or SSPX vs. the sedevacantist bishops, but they come out of the same narrow inner circle. Bishop Dolan cut his teeth in SSPX and was consecrated by Bishop Pivarunas.
This doesn't mean necessarily that they are all part of a conspiracy, but it is not very inspiring that the traditional world is so small and incestuous and has already produced such types as Dolan and Schuckardt. If Bishop Dolan's troubles lead people to go back into SSPX, hey, the devil wins either way. He's got you there on una cuм and NFP; and in the sedevacantist world he's got you on NFP alone.
What is remarkable to me is the traditional clergy's uniformity on Natural Family Planning. Maybe I'm making connections that aren't there, but I think that this ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ wave of priests is entirely connected to Natural Family Planning, and that they are a punishment, literally a scourge, sent by God to Catholics in these days who don't want to hear the truth, and who have gone along with this.
It is sort of weird that today I was talking to my mom about this, comparing these ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs who are natural-born communists to a swarm of locusts, and then I thought of the name Father CEKADA -- Cicada i.e. locust! Yikes.
If you support these priests who teach communism, who pretend to be against the ecuмenism and liberalism of Vatican II while still holding on to one of its worst features -- Natural Family Planning -- you are just going to keep attracting these locusts and/or cicadas into your life. Doesn't anyone else wonder why they use a term from Vatican II, Natural Family Planning? Why is this the one error that has slipped in under the radar, and why is it so ferociously defended, to the point that Bishop Pivarunas uses a textbook from 1963 to try and justify it?
"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears." What people should be doing is insisting that they will not support priests, teachers, who believe in or teach Natural Family Planning.
There are surely some priests and bishops out there who are not ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs or communist infiltrators, who only go along with NFP because it is the majority view and there is a sort of lemming-like peer pressure and mass hypnosis involved. Maybe they never thought about it, assuming it was time-tested doctrine. I know when I first became Catholic, right away it struck me as wrong, but I talked myself out of it, saying "Well, everyone agrees Pius XII was the last Pope and he taught it." I also was convinced by the decisions of the Sacred Congregation in the 19th century without differentiating between modern NFP and the antiquated, ineffective rhythm method. I hadn't yet read "Allocution to Midwives" and seen that the "serious motives" or "grave reasons" to use NFP actually made it worse than birth control, which is already bad enough.
It is actually painful to overcome the comforting fiction that Pius XII was the last true Pope. But as my friend Brian says, for those of good will, that NFP is un-Catholic is UNDENIABLE. And it really is. It could not be more blatantly eugenics and socialism.
This is the way we should attack the root of the problem, instead of lopping off branch after branch, the same routine going on interminably.
****
I believe that many if not most ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are natural-born liberals and have no interest in teaching true Catholic doctrine. They will melt like the Wicked Witch of the West if they are forced to tell the TRUTH.
Have you ever asked yourself why there is this infestation of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the Church? Don't you see it is because, having to lie about what they are, they are schizophrenics and double-minded and they have been sent by the devil to make YOU double-minded? Like the Jєωs who reject Christ, the obstinacy and defiance of their lifestyle makes them perfect enemies of God.
This is my own theory, but I also believe that their obsession with appearances, with looks and physical beauty, has something Luciferian about it -- ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is like psychopathic narcissism where you want to have sex with what resembles you, with your own mirror image. Maybe that is metaphysical psychobabble, but it is very noticeable that many ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have a strange, glassy, too-perfect surface appearance. Such is what I've observed growing up in L.A.
I have the feeling they are literally taking revenge on the religion they feel has persecuted them through the centuries. Theoretically someone could be born with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ urges and overcome them and be a good Catholic. But anyone who expresses even the slightest tendency in that direction should be blocked from the priesthood.
I once wanted to be a filmmaker before realizing that Hollywood was nothing but a bunch of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ Jєωs, and now it's like I've never escaped. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and Marranos and Freemasons have infiltrated the Church and now it is like a wildfire raging out of control. What can stop it? They have a cushy job, access to choirboys, they can play dress-up... Why would they ever want to quit?
This is a repugnant era in which to live. It has led me to immerse myself in constant apocalyptic fantasies. It can't be right to actually look FORWARD to an apocalypse, can it? I don't want to see people suffering, I don't take pleasure in that at all, but the Holy Spirit is dying and something has to change. I don't see any way out except for the wrath of God.