Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: BF: April 2011 Letter to Friends Benefactors  (Read 1669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stevusmagnus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3728
  • Reputation: +825/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
BF: April 2011 Letter to Friends Benefactors
« Reply #30 on: April 16, 2011, 12:28:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis
    Quote
    And how should BF have treated him? What should BF have done after the interview was released?


    BW said NOTHING wrong or untrue.  BF should have stood with BW, as what he said is demonstrably true -- and giving the Judaics an inch only leads to their taking a thousand miles.


    Ahh, yes. You would tie the entire fate of Traditional Catholicism and the Restoration to a h0Ɩ0cαųst Denial thesis regarding an historical matter completely unrelated to the Faith that happened almost 70 years ago?  :fryingpan:

    No thanks! I'll go with BF!


    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    BF: April 2011 Letter to Friends Benefactors
    « Reply #31 on: April 16, 2011, 12:31:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis
    So, you can tell, from a distance and across time, that the interviewer was there to do a hit piece?  WOW!!!

    Considering BW was there and personally involved, he must have been completely blinded by his rage against the Jєωs to be so gob-smackingly imprudent...


    A secular reporter from a Swedish TV station is there to do an investigative report and you claim NO red flags should have gone up??

    You, who see a conspiracy everywhere would have welcomed this chap in and started opining on the h0Ɩ0cαųst?

    Does not BW constantly rail on the media and how they are completly corrupt, amoral, and set on their agenda??


    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    BF: April 2011 Letter to Friends Benefactors
    « Reply #32 on: April 16, 2011, 12:33:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    StevusMagnus said:
    Quote
    It sure wasn't "universally exposed αnтι-ѕємιтєs and h0Ɩ0cαųst deniers" as it was afterwards.


    You are on the wrong site.  No one wants to hear this kind of swill on CathInfo.  They can open any Jєωιѕн rag to hear what you're selling, or go to a Novus Ordo Mass and listen to a homily from the "priest," followed by the visit of a rabbi.  

    The day for your vision of the world is OVER, copy that cowboy?  What was whispered in back rooms will be shouted from the rooftops.  I am offended and outraged that I have to hear this junk about "αnтι-ѕємιтєs" on CathInfo.  


    Like it or not, this is the view of the Society (unwarranted though it may be) by many AFTER the media explosion caused by BW's interview.

    It's the reality Raoul. If you don't like reality, go bury your head in the sand. If you want to face it then face it.

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +825/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    BF: April 2011 Letter to Friends Benefactors
    « Reply #33 on: April 16, 2011, 12:35:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    A Rosary Crusade to lift the excommunications -- that one is the most insulting of all.  Instead of demanding answers from the heretics in Rome, as they claim they're doing, SSPX is begging for scraps.


    How did the "demanding answers" work out for the Sedes?

    What good have they accomplished in the crisis? ..... *crickets*