Luker - I do like his quidlibet articles. Fr. Cekada has a sense of humor that most vacantists lack. And, perhaps I should not say that he "admitted" these things, but I think this is the first time he has put the "solutions" in writing(I remember it only from a video interview). But, if it is true that you can declare the chair vacant without cardinals or a council, then they should not abandon that "truth". But, by the looks of this article, they are.
And, Fr. Cekada has said that he does not believe in the material/formal thesis(privationism), so therefore he is a conclavist.
I just want people to know up front what the end of all of these options are, because their is a obvious end to each(and they know it). Vacantists hinder reasoning along those lines. And, that offends me.