Author Topic: Cath Info Posters - priorities and topics (Read 8989 times)

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #65 on:** November 26, 2010, 08:31:49 PM »

John, this means they love you.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #66 on:** November 26, 2010, 08:47:04 PM »

Quote from: Alexandria

The only one here that should go is Stevus, and take your smug, self-righteous defender John Steven with you who thinks he is better than everyone ("Thank you, lord, that I am not like the rest of these people....").

Go back to CAF where you both fit in and belong.

Actually if he fit in over there he wouldn't have gotten like 20 infractions there.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #67 on:** November 26, 2010, 08:48:10 PM »

Quote from: faith3faith

I'm new to this Catholic forum, but from what I've read from Stevus so far,...he or she seems like a modernist

Not true. I posted with stevus on CAF before I got booted. stevus does not like the NO.

OHCA · « **Reply #68 on:** November 26, 2010, 10:07:04 PM »

Quote from: parentsfortruth

. . .

If it were easy to figure this out, there wouldn't be any fighting/different opinions. Unfortunately it's not. It's a convoluted mess manufactured by none other than Satan himself.

Need we be reminded of when Pope Leo XIII had that vision at the tabernacle? We KNOW the Devil has everything to do with this. The best thing we can do is to get as much grace as we can during these times, and once sacramental grace has run out, we do what Our Lady has told us to do when there isn't any: Wear your scapular and pray your Rosary.

. . .

I like what you posted.

Where can I find information about the vision of Pope Leo XIII?

You mentioned sacramental grace running out. Is this a figure of speech? If not, what is this based on?

hollingsworth1 · « **Reply #69 on:** November 26, 2010, 10:27:12 PM »

Stevus:

Quote

Look, I have no problem with the Sedes as individuals. I was just blowing off some steam because I was looking for conversation regarding the crisis from a non-Sede perspective.

I'm still trying to pin Stevus down on what he means in reference to "conspiracy theories." His rather eliptical remarks are not easitly tied together. I'm thinking now that by "conspiracy theories," he is referring to sedevacantist perspectives which he characterizes as such. Or does he mean something else? Please, Stevus, tell us exactly what you mean by "conspiracy theories." I think we need to aim on this forum towards a greater precision in the use of language.