Author Topic: Cath Info Posters - priorities and topics (Read 9011 times)

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #30 on:** November 26, 2010, 09:44:04 AM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: stevusmagnus
The sedes can disagree all they want in the crisis section. They just can't discuss sedevacantism or call BXVI an "anti-pope" etc.

I think it would be nice if there were a subforum where people who approach the crisis one way (there is a Pope) can go back and forth and have that discussion without being constantly interrupted with sede arguments coming from a completely different mindset.

Then have the same thing for the sedes. Just an idea.

Really stevus, now you are dictating what mindset can/cannot discuss/contribute in the Crisis section.

I'm not dictating anything. Just an idea to allow SSPX'ers a chance to discuss the crisis without contsantly running into anti-pope arguments and accusations. Otherwise every thread can be derailed into sedevacantism.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #31 on:** November 26, 2010, 09:50:33 AM »

The attitude that sedes need to be kicked out is a serious problem. It creates an attitude that leads to following the Vatican and to following those who seem to be dead set on appeasing the Vatican no matter what they do.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #32 on:** November 26, 2010, 09:54:25 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

The attitude that sedes need to be kicked out is a serious problem. It creates an attitude that leads to following the Vatican and to following those who seem to be dead set on appeasing the Vatican no matter what they do.

I'm not saying they need to be kicked out. I'm talking about subject matter. I'd simply put the crisis section off limits for discussion of the subject of sedevacantism.

Then I'd create a new subforum where sedevacantism could be discussed at length. Maybe even put a crisis section in there where sedevacantism could be discussed.

Just ideas.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #33 on:** November 26, 2010, 09:55:15 AM »

The attitude that sedes need to be kicked out is a serious problem. It means those who are judged to criticize the Pope too harshly are going to be called "crypto-sedes" or "conspiracy kooks," and it leads to following the Vatican and those who seem to be dead set on appeasing the Vatican no matter what they do.

LM · « **Reply #34 on:** November 26, 2010, 09:56:54 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Quote from: LM
Quote from: stevusmagnus
The sedes can disagree all they want in the crisis section. They just can't discuss sedevacantism or call BXVI an "anti-pope" etc.

I think it would be nice if there were a subforum where people who approach the crisis one way (there is a Pope) can go back and forth and have that discussion without being constantly interrupted with sede arguments coming from a completely different mindset.

Then have the same thing for the sedes. Just an idea.

Really stevus, now you are dictating what mindset can/cannot discuss/contribute in the Crisis section.

I'm not dictating anything. Just an idea to allow SSPX'ers a chance to discuss the crisis without contsantly running into anti-pope arguments and accusations. Otherwise every thread can be derailed into sedevacantism.

Seems to be that you were not much concerned with "running into anti-pope arguments" until the disagreements arising from B16 interviews.