Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Author Topic: Cardinal Rampolla  (Read 7046 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline roscoe

Cardinal Rampolla
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2008, 05:33:56 PM »
The 'OTO Manifesto' is a fraudulent docuмet.

I hope this Forum is beginning to understand that FM's purpose is to destroy the reputations of not only Card Rampolla but Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Cardinal Raphael and Francis Mac Nutt. There is not even a hint of discord between these men that I can find anywhere and it is my judgement that the last four mentioned are a whole lot more qualified to judge the character of Card Rampolla than Mr. Hiembichner or FM or Mr Vennari or Michael Dimond.

And there is not one allegation of anything Card Rampolla has done to bring discredit upon Holy Church--except 'join the OTO' according to a forgery(masons have been known to do these kinds of things.) Anyone can type up a piece of paper.

Logged

Offline roscoe

Cardinal Rampolla
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2008, 04:07:04 PM »
I would just like to remind anyone in this Forum who may still be believing the absurd charges brought against  Cardinal Rampolla of the following.

I have posted my research  on Catholic.com, Fisheaters.com and Cathinfo.com not to mention some other websites.

Througout all of this NOT ONE PERSON has ever come up with ONE allegation of anything the Cardinal ACTUALLY DID  to harm Holy Church. Moral of story====where there is no smoke there is no fire.
Logged

Offline roscoe

Cardinal Rampolla
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2008, 01:51:20 PM »
No smoke==no fire. Not one person has ever a specific accusation of any kind against the Cardinal. It is Franz-Joseph that is the Freemason. He is 'surrounded by judaics' according to no less of a source than Mr. Kertzer himself. And because of this Pius IX declared that the 'veto' was no longer of any consequence and was not recognised.

Fortunatly, the Papacy did not suffer because some ghibbelline cardinals didn't listen to Pius IX and blocked Rampolla.

In 1914 the situation was different as Card Raphael was 'vetoed'. This time we got a pope who I believe will someday be recognised as an anti-pope.
Logged

Offline Emile

  • Supporter
Re: Cardinal Rampolla
« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2021, 11:36:03 PM »
Quote from: roscoe on January 28, 2008, 02:44:56 PM
I posted this previously on catholic.com and fisheaters before I was banned so some of you may be familiar with the topic.

A nasty rumor that Cardinal Mariano Rampolla was somehow a secret occult mason and in the OTO has somehow been circulating for about 100 years. It started when writer Msg Jouin was fed a forged, phony docuмent cooked up by a cabal trying to discredit the great Cardinal. This is not an attack on Jouin--I am only saying that no one gets everything right.

Cardinal Rampolla was Sec of State under Pope Leo XIII and arch-priest of Vatican Cathedral under St. Pius X.

So far as I know, the persons spreading this story(sincere or otherwise) include Piers Compton(The Broken Cross), Yves Chiron(bio of Pius X), Craig Hiembichner(Blood On Alter and other works), John Vennari of Catholic Family News, Lady Queenborough( I think she is mistaken-not malicious), and the Dimond Bros Most Holy Family Monastery.

This story is very dangerous as if true(which it certainly is not) it completely discredits the character of Leo XIII, Cardinal Raphael Merry Del Valle, St Pius X and Francis MacNutt(Papal Chamberlain).

The Cardinal was a great man and it is my view that he is being attacked, among other reasons because he and Leo XIII were of the anti-Dreyfus party. The ʝʊdɛօ-masonic clique around Franz-Joseph pressured him to veto the Cardinals ɛƖɛctıon as Pope in 1903.

Fortunately no harm was done to Holy Church as the administration of affairs was carried on by St. Pius no differently than they would have been in a Rampolla papacy.

I hope no-one has fallen for this smear on a great man.
The version that you give would make sense of a detail that I have always found puzzling. The common story has Rampolla as a Freemason whose election was vetoed by Franz-Joseph. But then St. Pius X removed that power for subsequent Papal elections. If the veto power is what kept a Freemason out, why would St. Pius remove it?
Under your version PP Pius would have removed the ius exclusivae because it was being abused.

Logged

Offline roscoe

Re: Cardinal Rampolla
« Reply #19 on: June 05, 2021, 12:12:56 AM »
 :popcorn:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
« previous next »