Author Topic: Cardinal Rampolla Supporters (Read 1051 times)

roscoe · « **on:** July 10, 2009, 01:31:24 AM »

It' is time to get it straight. Who are the supporters of Card Mariano Rampolla. I will be the first to vote yes. ( no edit)

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #1 on:** July 10, 2009, 01:43:26 AM »

I have a policy of not supporting dead men; nothing in it for me. :wink: May he rest in peace.

roscoe · « **Reply #2 on:** July 10, 2009, 02:01:18 PM »

So far there is only one supporter of Card Rampolla( and by inference Popes Leo XIII, St Pius X, and the true Pius XI-- Merry Del Val, who in all likelihood was actually elected Pope in 1914). Ciao

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** July 10, 2009, 05:45:30 PM »

Ratti would then be more properly known as Pius XII and Pacelli as Pius XIII.

roscoe · « **Reply #4 on:** July 10, 2009, 07:34:44 PM »

Of course a way will have to be found how to absolve Card Raphael( Pius XI) from the nefarious acts committed by the marrano anti-pope Della Chiesa.

CM · « **Reply #5 on:** July 14, 2009, 12:24:57 AM »

I don't know about Rampolla. I understand he was vetoed because of evidence he was a Mason. I also don't think that Popes Leo XIII and Pius X can be held guilty of their communion with him even if he was a Mason, because he could have hidden it from them very effectively.

And how exactly do you think true popes can follow antipopes? How can a Catholic pope come from a line of manifestly non-Catholic antipopes?

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** July 14, 2009, 04:17:05 PM »

Card Rampolla did not hide anything from anyone. There is no need to apologise for Leo or Pius because they were not vigilant enough to detect that he was allegedly a 'secret occult mason in the OTO'. The docuмent 'incriminating' Card Rampolla is just as bogus as the docuмent that 'ex-communicated' Fr Feeney. ciao