I can see now what you mean. Please excuse my own lack of comprehension and reading abilities, and I certainly did not want to be offensive.
The facts you stated are certainly right (besides the comment on point 5, I would think). If this makes him a great Saint I do not know -some actually say that- but certainly a great statesman.
Personally I strongly disagree with the "Rampollian policy" during the Pontificate of Papa´s Pecci, della Chiesa and the following Pontiffs, and certainly much more so than Don Ricossa, who is also not a exactly a Cardinal Rampolla fan.
Still, I think it is a legitimate opinion to think otherwise.
My main point is, though, that a personal attack on Rampolla is not necessary to argue about the policies of the Holy See during those years. It just brings it down to a level, on which civilized and Christian people should not argue.
Therefore, I am glad that Ricossa brought this subject up - despite the internal "anti-freemasonic" secret police of traditionalism.