Author Topic: CAF 30 Day Ban For Stating Fact (Read 3290 times)

stevusmagnus · « **on:** December 19, 2010, 11:46:53 PM »

The thread title was "You know you're a Trad when..."

I stated a FACT and wad banned for inflammatory, offensive, and uncharitable comment!

Can a fact be uncharitable, offensive, and inflammatory?

I think this guy just likes to hit the infraction button.

Quote

Dear stevusmagnus,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: offensive and uncharitable comments after many infractions
-------
After many infractions, you continue to make inflammatory and uncharitable comments. It has become obvious that the rules mean very little to you. Your account is suspended for 30 days.
-------

This infraction is worth 100 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=7380404
Quote:
You discover the major Vatican II docuмents were crafted by theologians previously censured by Pius XII's Holy Office...
All the best,
Catholic Answers Forums

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #1 on:** December 19, 2010, 11:51:52 PM »

They can't handle the truth.

How will you be able to enjoy the holidays with that ban hanging over you? :wink:

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #2 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:22:31 AM »

This was apparently a very "mean" fact to point out!

Telesphorus · « **Reply #3 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:26:38 AM »

I was already permabanned for pointing out that the mod said not to post magisterium of Leo XIII, and is therefore a traitor to the Catholic Church.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #4 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:29:58 AM »

Lol! They must ensure no truth gets into the Matrix.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #5 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:32:25 AM »

Reminds me of Orwell's memory hole.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #6 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:39:05 AM »

I keep getting e-mails saying I got a private message there. So I go in thinking some other Trad is PM'ing me and undoubtedly it is always this Jackass telling me I got another infraction for something ridiculous.

I think there are a bunch of sissies running around forwarding all "mean" trad posts to the head idiot.

Belloc · « **Reply #7 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:44:51 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

I was already permabanned for pointing out that the mod said not to post magisterium of Leo XIII, and is therefore a traitor to the Catholic Church.

can you tell me more about this incident? CAF did not like Leo? they said you did not??

He is one of my favorite Popes of the last 100+ yrs, so a bit curious...

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:45:37 AM »

Quote from: Roman Catholic

They can't handle the truth.

How will you be able to enjoy the holidays with that ban hanging over you? :wink:

not being on Keatings Christmas card list would really ruin it for me :roll-laugh1:

Telesphorus · « **Reply #9 on:** December 20, 2010, 07:48:06 AM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: Telesphorus
I was already permabanned for pointing out that the mod said not to post magisterium of Leo XIII, and is therefore a traitor to the Catholic Church.

can you tell me more about this incident? CAF did not like Leo? they said you did not??

He is one of my favorite Popes of the last 100+ yrs, so a bit curious...

Well, I did send an email calling him a traitor - which is undoubtedly a reason to ban me, but they are refusing to allow discussion of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ under false pretexts. Amazing how they can ban trads for mentioning Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ but they can't allow discussion of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ because pro-masons might say it's okay to join? Isn't that the lamest, phoniest excuse you've ever heard?

I can't find my post from Humanum Genus anymore. First they banned me, I think now they've purged the post I made.

"Thomas Casey" is a traitor to the Catholic Church.

You can't censor Catholic magisterium without being an enemy of the Church.

LM · « **Reply #10 on:** December 20, 2010, 08:51:17 AM »

Gotta keep the myth that there has been no rupture between the pre and post Vat II Church. To keep this myth going, they fall into suppressing/censuring writings from the pre-Vat II magisterium that bring the rupture to light. And of course, can't have people knowing that the Vat II docuмents were crafted by "theologians" once censured for being enemies of the Faith. So works the mind of the new "conservatives". Minds that operate without true sensus Catholicus.

clare · « **Reply #11 on:** December 20, 2010, 09:24:44 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Quote
Dear stevusmagnus,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: offensive and uncharitable comments after many infractions

Original Post:
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=7380404
Quote:
You discover the major Vatican II docuмents were crafted by theologians previously censured by Pius XII's Holy Office...[

Is that it??!

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #12 on:** December 20, 2010, 09:28:21 AM »

Clare,

Yes! It is quite astonishing. This fact is apparently "uncharitable" and "inflammatory"! Can a fact be uncharitable?

clare · « **Reply #13 on:** December 20, 2010, 09:37:39 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Clare,

Yes! It is quite astonishing. This fact is apparently "uncharitable" and "inflammatory"! Can a fact be uncharitable?

I could understand the mod asking you to substantiate your assertion, but a suspension seems way over the top!

umblehay anmay · « **Reply #14 on:** December 20, 2010, 09:48:53 AM »

I get sick thinking about how I financially supported groups like CA and EWTN by buying books written by Madrid, Keating, etc. in my last several years in the Novus DisOrdo.

Anyone want to file a class action suit with me? :boxer: I think we can get them on fraud charges!!!