Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance  (Read 2681 times)

2 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2026, 01:29:14 PM »
Remember watching this guy years ago, might give him another look. Any chance you could try for Father David Nix (Padre Peregrino) next? I Think the guy has interviewed Williamson before and has a decent social media presence: including catechesis podcasts on pope Pius X's catechism and the council of Trent.

I also used to follow Br. Nathanael many years ago, very glad to hear this news. And I second the motion to get Fr. Nix on board with the Resistance!

Offline Meg

Re: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2026, 03:31:18 PM »
Look ... BISHOP WILLIAMSON DID NOT BELIEVE THAT.  If anything, Bishop Williamson took grief for bringing Sacraments to one group under a so-called "Feeneyite" priest, to some Ukrainian Catholic Traditionalists, and softened considerably in the end toward sedevacantism.  In fact, he even famously told the one lady that it was OK for her to attend the Novus Ordo Mass.

I knew Bishop Williamson very well ... unlike this Cabbage here, where I went on many long walks with him on the seminary grounds, and he ate dinner with my family on a number of occasions.  Bishop Williamson was absolutely hostile to some notion that there's only one true genuine Traditionalist group, which is precisely WHY he didn't found one himself after he was expelled from SSPX.  He didn't beleive in Trad groups, but had this view that there is now a disapora of faithful Catholics, some in this group, some in that, etc.

Cabbage is promoting crap that his hero Bishop Williamson would denounce.  Bishop Williamson would repudiate Cabbage if His Excellency were still alive today.

Yes, Bp. Williamson exhibited a level of charity that few on this forum would appreciate or understand. That's why I support others in the Resistance like him, such as Fr. Chazal. 


Re: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2026, 03:43:08 PM »
Hi Tom,

Sincere question here.  Why do you believe the resistance is the remnant? What is true about the resistance that is not true of other groups?  For example, what doctrinal positions, or practices, make it stand out as true?   

Thank you for a sincere question. Increasingly rare on this forum lately.

Very simple answer. It firmly rejects modernism (unlike SSPX/indult etc.) which is the Catholic thing to do, and yet does not reject the Churchs moral theology around doubt in the Sacraments such as the Thucists do.

We do as the Church has always done. For all our faults.

Re: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2026, 03:44:16 PM »
Perhaps one of the remnants, yes. Do the bishops of the Resistance all believe that only the Resistance is the true remnant? I don't think that Bp. Williamson did.

If he didnt believe it then he wouldnt have consecrated Bishops to that effect.

Think hard about that.

Re: Brother Nathaniel ... SSPX Resistance
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2026, 03:45:49 PM »
By the way, you all should read through brother nathaniels response to criticism on his twitter post.

He is HARD CORE resistance. Its amazing. You Thucists should all be blushing right now and even the luke warm resistance people.