Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy  (Read 11619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6173
  • Reputation: +3147/-2941
  • Gender: Female
Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
« Reply #60 on: August 01, 2022, 10:34:18 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • This cattiness towards obedience downstream of a dangerous RnR articulation, generally. Of course they follow who they believe is Christ's vicar. What do you suggest they do differently? Their position has internal coherence.

    Yes, their position does have internal coherence. I agree. For sedecavantists, internal coherence is important. But...you are expecting have be able to have internal coherence in a situation where it is very difficult to have internal coherence. In a Crisis in the Church, which we currently have, which has been brought on by the Church being occupied by a Modernist sect, and Modernists having infiltrated at least a century ago, internal coherence cannot be had, in my opinion. We do not live in normal times. Never in the history of the Church have heretics occupied Rome. In the Arian Crisis, heretics occupied much of Rome, but the Pope was not included. 

    Sedevacantists don't really focus much on the reasons for the Crisis, but the reasons are very important, since Modernism is a different kettle of fish from all of the other heresies that have afflicted the Church since its beginning. I can live with lack of internal coherence, because I am not God, and I am not a prophet. I do not know why God has allowed the Church to be occupied by Modernists. But I suspect, as many of R&R's have, that it has something to so with sin, and with Catholics not adhering to God's laws. But not only that. Love and charity is lacking in Modernism, since the salvation of souls is not an issue. They think that pretty much everyone is going to Heaven. 

    Love and Charity is also lacking in some Traditionalists. Sedevacantism is what is most important to some of them. Certainly not the love of God and neighbor. Only the law is what matters. Nothing else. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #61 on: August 01, 2022, 10:42:53 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • An Opus dei, Jєω-trad media pundit... outing a Jєω anti-pope.  :laugh1:

    If I understand your logic correctly, it goes like this:

    Major: Opus Dei is a Jєω-controlled infiltration and subversion group;

    Minor: Prominent members of Opus Dei are influencing people toward sedevacantism.

    Conclusion: Sedevacantism is a Jєωιѕн subversion tactic.

    Is this what you are getting at?

    Noblesse oblige.


    Offline bodeens

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1514
    • Reputation: +803/-159
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #62 on: August 01, 2022, 10:43:10 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, man. A chic who is of half Jєω blood gave me her phone number and email. I know she's baptized with water and Spirit, so the Deicidal curse is lifted, because I asked her if she was baptized. I know she's of half Jєω blood because she told me, too, but I knew by looking at her. She went to a Catholic school, too. She's real cute. I might court her.
    "Lois", why would you court a woman?
    Regard all of my posts as unfounded slander, heresy, theologically specious etc
    I accept Church teaching on Implicit Baptism of Desire.
    Francis is Pope.
    NO is a good Mass.
    Not an ironic sig.

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8316
    • Reputation: +4706/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #63 on: August 01, 2022, 10:45:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Lois", why would you court a woman?
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9543
    • Reputation: +6256/-940
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #64 on: August 01, 2022, 10:46:22 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!2
  • …blah, blah, blah…sedes…blah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedes


    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9543
    • Reputation: +6256/-940
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #65 on: August 01, 2022, 10:49:43 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • …blah, blah, blah…sedes…blah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedesblah, blah, blah…sedes

    Offline bodeens

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1514
    • Reputation: +803/-159
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #66 on: August 01, 2022, 10:53:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sedevacantists don't really focus much on the reasons for the Crisis
    :confused: We talk about this all day in the ghetto.
    Regard all of my posts as unfounded slander, heresy, theologically specious etc
    I accept Church teaching on Implicit Baptism of Desire.
    Francis is Pope.
    NO is a good Mass.
    Not an ironic sig.

    Offline Simeon

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 751
    • Reputation: +481/-34
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #67 on: August 01, 2022, 12:14:55 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • All great points, bravo.

    The thing that got me away from Ripperger was his constant revealing of what information he received from demons during exorcisms and how he then turns around and applies it to current events. There was one such instance where he claimed that a demon said things were coming to a head soon (paraphrasing) and I had to ask "so we're using the Roman Ritual for divination now?"

    On top of that, his complete blindness to the situation with Bergoglio and adherence to the NO conservative party line just made me swear off of him altogether.

    EXACTLY! And that is an interesting point you bring up – using the Roman Rite for divination! Phew!!!

    He speaks so cavalierly about what should be treated with the utmost formality, discretion, and even secrecy. His referring to devils as “guys,” his incessant bragging about “beating up demons,” is puerile and irresponsible.

    And he is now breeding a host of other creeping ghouls posing as devil biters. How about this trending piece of work?



    Another problem I have with Ripperger and the conservative NO’s is authoritarianism. You will note that they beat the drum incessantly about authority, the veritable pinnacle of their apologia pro the fetid imposture they worship as the true ecclesiastical hierarchy. I have found that they are eminently satisfied with a fleshless skeleton – a tempo-material power (read:authority) stripped of all relation to Catholic truth, doctrine, and morality. They literally idolize authority. They worship authority. They slavishly serve authority, per se. When Vatican II accomplished the dissolution of Doctrine and Authority, the followers and servants of the miscreants choose authority over truth. The Catholic must choose truth over authority, because of ordination. Authority is ordered to Truth, and not vice versa. But these did not. These chose wrongly; and they are working feverishly to pollute the understanding of the entire membership of the Church. 

    If you go to the Regina Prophetarum blog, you will find novus ordo priest Sean Kopzcinski ever disseminating his novel religion of authority worship. He never insists on the integral Faith. Rather he incessantly insists on the need for authority. Nor does he define authority. Nor does he teach the essential attributes of ecclesiastical authority. Nor does he distinguish ecclesiastical authority from human purely authority. Nor does he propound the sine qua non principle that the Faith is not ordered to authority, but authority is ordered to the Faith. Faith is the term. Authority is not a term.

    Kopzcinski is one of the best examples I can produce of the idol worship and authoritarianism running through the entire novus ordo. Before they openly worshiped pagan deities, the hierarchs forced their subjects to worship their illegitimate imposture in the name of authority. If we could build a statue to commemorate this fall into servitude, we would name it, not Lady Liberty, but Lord Authoritarius.

    The end of all this error is idolatry. For having made naked authority their god, they are now incapacitated, as a punishment. When their overseers openly worship pagan deities, these slaves are powerless to resist, powerless to denounce, powerless to break away. They have lost all salt, and all power of virtuous operation. 

    There is a real distinction between true and legitimate authority and usurpation, the latter being the cause of all authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is the ape of true authority. Wherever you find depravity and usurpation, you will find tyranny, which is no more than authoritarianism posing as authority. Consider the authoritarianism of the communists and their proxy armies. Race authoritarianism. Sodomitical authoritarianism. Perversity and disorder are not merely shoved in our faces. We are beaten into submission by a virulent and jealous tyranny.

    Now look at Ripperger et. al.. He and his “deliverance brotherhood” are taking authoritarianism to a new height – or to a new nadir. Not only do they worship naked authority as does Kopzcinski, but they add a twist of their own. They insert authoritarianism into “exorcism culture.”

    God give me the grace to articulate what is in my mind.

    I’m certain that demons are very much under the authority of God and the Celestial Hierarchy. They cannot so much as flinch without permissions. The Angelical ranks are composed in a wonderful order, and this order is replete with Divine and delegated authority. Authority might even be the hallmark attribute of the Intellectual Order.

    And most certainly real exorcists understand this structure, adhere to it, and use it to the utmost advantage, being themselves in authority over demons by virtue of their Orders and Faculties.

    But this real authority can be inverted, aped, usurped, duped, or exploited by demons, who desire only to deceive men.

    I purchased ($0.99 kindle, thankfully) the Deliverance Prayers book put out by Ripperger. Another waste of cents, and another thing I never use.

    As I skimmed it and perused the whole thing, my stomach was more and more in knots. It literally gave me anxiety. One false move, and you are going to become subjected to demons by trying to expel them. You are given a plethora of prayers (most likely “touched by” Ryan Grant), and a rulebot’s dream of caveats, proscriptions, warnings, threats. It is perfectly pharisaical, perfectly levitical, and perhaps cabbalistic. All of the threatenings boil down to one thing – do you have authority over the person, place, or thing you are praying over?

    I’m just a layperson. I am not educated in theology and demonology. But my gut forces me to ask questions. First of all, why are laypeople in the demonic novus ordo being glutted with a superfluity of binding prayers that they are unable to wield? And who is doing the glutting but invalidly ordained clerics in business to propagate a false church? 

    I ask anyone here with learning – did the Church engage laypeople in minor exorcism ministration systems in the past? Were laypeople drafted into spiritual armies, and sent into battle with angelic princes, alone and armed only with books of prayers?

    Why are laypeople being glutted with useless information about who has authority over demons, and in what circuмstances? Why are novus ordo “exorcists” the new tradlebrities? Why is exorcism trending, all the while demonic power continues to grow unchecked? Weren’t laypeople always simply urged to stay in the state of grace, to cast all their cares upon the Lord, to stay far away from all forms of superstition, and to have recourse to God, to the Mother of God, and to the Saints and Angels, to fight their battles for them?

    What is this novel form of lay empowerment?

    And why does it reek of levitical, tyrannical, authoritarian gnat straining?

    Novus Ordo Inc. is luring people into a great big sucking vortex, which has satan for its eye. Witchcraft and idolatry are everywhere, their various and manifold forms designed to capture even the Elect, were that possible.



    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8316
    • Reputation: +4706/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #68 on: August 01, 2022, 12:41:14 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • In short, what you're describing there is Pharasaism. When you place the letter of the Law above all other things, you are not operating in the spirit of Christ.

    The authority of NO exorcists is one of those things that people try to point to in order to undermine arguments against the validity of NO orders. But, it's not the individual who has this authority, but Christ and His Holy Name. Protestants are able to cast out demons through deliverance prayers, but this has nothing to do with them personally, but the power of the prayers themselves in the Holy Ghost.

    The same can be said of Ripperger. Yes, in normal times, priests have jurisdiction which gives them a certain authority over demons. But, NO priests do not have this because they are not priests. Yet, they are still able to cast out demons. This is because the rites in themselves are efficacious, and, Christ is permitting this efficacy for the sake of the souls involved so that they may see that the traditional Faith is true. Hence why the Vatican had to authorize the Rituale Romanum again because their NO rite wasn't doing it. Which has further shown that tradition has this power.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Simeon

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 751
    • Reputation: +481/-34
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #69 on: August 01, 2022, 01:21:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In short, what you're describing there is Pharasaism. When you place the letter of the Law above all other things, you are not operating in the spirit of Christ.

    The authority of NO exorcists is one of those things that people try to point to in order to undermine arguments against the validity of NO orders. But, it's not the individual who has this authority, but Christ and His Holy Name. Protestants are able to cast out demons through deliverance prayers, but this has nothing to do with them personally, but the power of the prayers themselves in the Holy Ghost.

    The same can be said of Ripperger. Yes, in normal times, priests have jurisdiction which gives them a certain authority over demons. But, NO priests do not have this because they are not priests. Yet, they are still able to cast out demons. This is because the rites in themselves are efficacious, and, Christ is permitting this efficacy for the sake of the souls involved so that they may see that the traditional Faith is true. Hence why the Vatican had to authorize the Rituale Romanum again because their NO rite wasn't doing it. Which has further shown that tradition has this power.
    Man, O man. This is interesting. 

    You are affirming that people without valid Orders and without proper Faculties, are nevertheless kicking demons out of people's lives.  

    A couple of considerations:

    1. If this is true, then they are exercising power over angelic princes over whom they have not a jot of real authority, per their own pronounced pecking order.

    What does that say about their obsession with the minutia of who has authority over whom? Is it part and parcel of trying to trick the public into thinking they and their overlords wield real ecclesiastical authority? If you don't really need your own authority, because it is the authority of Christ that operates, then why do they go on and on with their mosaical rules and regs? Plausible cover?

    And why has the Church always, in practice, made exorcists specialists of sorts? We know that demons are vengeful and very subtle. One needs training before undertaking battle with them, let alone authority to do the combat. 

    Do you know for certain that prots cast out demons? I know there is a passage in Scripture where independents were casting out devils in Jesus' Name, and our Lord did not denounce them.  

    2. Generally speaking, I am of the mind that they do not actually expel demons, but make things worse. I do not argue with you, though, because I am in the realm of speculation, and your speculations are as good as mine. We are told that by the fruits of a thing we may measure. I do not see good fruits, either in the prots or in the novus ordo. I see only that the time allotted to satan to increase his power has not been wasted by him. 

    In fact, Ripperger not that long ago finally admitted publicly in a podcast that statistically the amount of time needed to expel a demon has increased exponentially since the apostasy (my term). He admitted (implicitly) that they do not have the same power that real exorcists had. If you read between his lines, he admits that his ministry is a flop. And to strengthen that surmise, is the fact of his bragging that he fights Beelzebub himself, and wrests secrets from him. For that statement he recently made, is that Beelzebub himself literally sobbed and complained that the Heavenly Father is getting ready to take his power away. Ripperger is the public front of an impotent militia, but he would have you believe he beats, bites, commands, and debriefs the "big guns." I smell kabuki, and the Wizard of Oz.

    3. Would you agree with me that rookies and people not in the state of grace place themselves in grave danger when they call devils out to fight?

    4. Lastly, one cannot confect the Eucharist without valid ordination. It is Christ Who operates, but only through His appointed minister, who is not a mere inanimate instrument, but a real cooperator, an alter Christus. Likewise, an exorcist with proper faculties is personally in combat with demons, along with Christ, Whose power he wields, no? The priest is not a mere inanimate instrument, but a co-participant in the foray, no? Therefore, which individual human is doing battle, is important, no?






    Offline epiphany

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3542
    • Reputation: +1097/-875
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #70 on: August 01, 2022, 01:35:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • EXACTLY! And that is an interesting point you bring up – using the Roman Rite for divination! Phew!!!

    He speaks so cavalierly about what should be treated with the utmost formality, discretion, and even secrecy. His referring to devils as “guys,” his incessant bragging about “beating up demons,” is puerile and irresponsible.

    And he is now breeding a host of other creeping ghouls posing as devil biters. How about this trending piece of work?



    Another problem I have with Ripperger and the conservative NO’s is authoritarianism. You will note that they beat the drum incessantly about authority, the veritable pinnacle of their apologia pro the fetid imposture they worship as the true ecclesiastical hierarchy. I have found that they are eminently satisfied with a fleshless skeleton – a tempo-material power (read:authority) stripped of all relation to Catholic truth, doctrine, and morality. They literally idolize authority. They worship authority. They slavishly serve authority, per se. When Vatican II accomplished the dissolution of Doctrine and Authority, the followers and servants of the miscreants choose authority over truth. The Catholic must choose truth over authority, because of ordination. Authority is ordered to Truth, and not vice versa. But these did not. These chose wrongly; and they are working feverishly to pollute the understanding of the entire membership of the Church. 

    If you go to the Regina Prophetarum blog, you will find novus ordo priest Sean Kopzcinski ever disseminating his novel religion of authority worship. He never insists on the integral Faith. Rather he incessantly insists on the need for authority. Nor does he define authority. Nor does he teach the essential attributes of ecclesiastical authority. Nor does he distinguish ecclesiastical authority from human purely authority. Nor does he propound the sine qua non principle that the Faith is not ordered to authority, but authority is ordered to the Faith. Faith is the term. Authority is not a term.

    Kopzcinski is one of the best examples I can produce of the idol worship and authoritarianism running through the entire novus ordo. Before they openly worshiped pagan deities, the hierarchs forced their subjects to worship their illegitimate imposture in the name of authority. If we could build a statue to commemorate this fall into servitude, we would name it, not Lady Liberty, but Lord Authoritarius.

    The end of all this error is idolatry. For having made naked authority their god, they are now incapacitated, as a punishment. When their overseers openly worship pagan deities, these slaves are powerless to resist, powerless to denounce, powerless to break away. They have lost all salt, and all power of virtuous operation.

    There is a real distinction between true and legitimate authority and usurpation, the latter being the cause of all authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is the ape of true authority. Wherever you find depravity and usurpation, you will find tyranny, which is no more than authoritarianism posing as authority. Consider the authoritarianism of the communists and their proxy armies. Race authoritarianism. Sodomitical authoritarianism. Perversity and disorder are not merely shoved in our faces. We are beaten into submission by a virulent and jealous tyranny.

    Now look at Ripperger et. al.. He and his “deliverance brotherhood” are taking authoritarianism to a new height – or to a new nadir. Not only do they worship naked authority as does Kopzcinski, but they add a twist of their own. They insert authoritarianism into “exorcism culture.”

    God give me the grace to articulate what is in my mind.

    I’m certain that demons are very much under the authority of God and the Celestial Hierarchy. They cannot so much as flinch without permissions. The Angelical ranks are composed in a wonderful order, and this order is replete with Divine and delegated authority. Authority might even be the hallmark attribute of the Intellectual Order.

    And most certainly real exorcists understand this structure, adhere to it, and use it to the utmost advantage, being themselves in authority over demons by virtue of their Orders and Faculties.

    But this real authority can be inverted, aped, usurped, duped, or exploited by demons, who desire only to deceive men.

    I purchased ($0.99 kindle, thankfully) the Deliverance Prayers book put out by Ripperger. Another waste of cents, and another thing I never use.

    As I skimmed it and perused the whole thing, my stomach was more and more in knots. It literally gave me anxiety. One false move, and you are going to become subjected to demons by trying to expel them. You are given a plethora of prayers (most likely “touched by” Ryan Grant), and a rulebot’s dream of caveats, proscriptions, warnings, threats. It is perfectly pharisaical, perfectly levitical, and perhaps cabbalistic. All of the threatenings boil down to one thing – do you have authority over the person, place, or thing you are praying over?

    I’m just a layperson. I am not educated in theology and demonology. But my gut forces me to ask questions. First of all, why are laypeople in the demonic novus ordo being glutted with a superfluity of binding prayers that they are unable to wield? And who is doing the glutting but invalidly ordained clerics in business to propagate a false church? 

    I ask anyone here with learning – did the Church engage laypeople in minor exorcism ministration systems in the past? Were laypeople drafted into spiritual armies, and sent into battle with angelic princes, alone and armed only with books of prayers?

    Why are laypeople being glutted with useless information about who has authority over demons, and in what circuмstances? Why are novus ordo “exorcists” the new tradlebrities? Why is exorcism trending, all the while demonic power continues to grow unchecked? Weren’t laypeople always simply urged to stay in the state of grace, to cast all their cares upon the Lord, to stay far away from all forms of superstition, and to have recourse to God, to the Mother of God, and to the Saints and Angels, to fight their battles for them?

    What is this novel form of lay empowerment?

    And why does it reek of levitical, tyrannical, authoritarian gnat straining?

    Novus Ordo Inc. is luring people into a great big sucking vortex, which has satan for its eye. Witchcraft and idolatry are everywhere, their various and manifold forms designed to capture even the Elect, were that possible.
    Agreed.

    Here is Fr./b Pfeiffer's "lay exorcist" Paul Hernandez (aka Pablo, The Mexican, Chief in charge)


    https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/the-devil-and-mr-hernandez-6418725


    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8316
    • Reputation: +4706/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #71 on: August 01, 2022, 02:38:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Man, O man. This is interesting.

    You are affirming that people without valid Orders and without proper Faculties, are nevertheless kicking demons out of people's lives. 

    A couple of considerations:

    1. If this is true, then they are exercising power over angelic princes over whom they have not a jot of real authority, per their own pronounced pecking order.

    What does that say about their obsession with the minutia of who has authority over whom? Is it part and parcel of trying to trick the public into thinking they and their overlords wield real ecclesiastical authority? If you don't really need your own authority, because it is the authority of Christ that operates, then why do they go on and on with their mosaical rules and regs? Plausible cover?

    They genuinely believe they are Catholic priests, for starters. So I don't think there's any intent on their part of deceit, but, they are being used as tools of Satan to promote the false church.

    Do you know for certain that prots cast out demons? I know there is a passage in Scripture where independents were casting out devils in Jesus' Name, and our Lord did not denounce them.

    Look in to "deliverance services" and you'll see how Protestants handle "exorcism". As for Our Lord's commendation of using His Name, that would fall under what I suspect about the influence these men are wielding to effect deliverance through the prayers. Our Lord also said the following:
    "Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity." [Matt. 7:22-23]

    3. Would you agree with me that rookies and people not in the state of grace place themselves in grave danger when they call devils out to fight?

    Yes, undoubtedly they do because they are already under the dominion of Satan.

    Responses in red
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #72 on: August 02, 2022, 09:34:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • :confused: We talk about this all day in the ghetto.

    I wasn't aware of that. You discuss the heresy of Modernism all day?

    In my experience, the reasons for the Crisis/heresy isn't all that important to sedevacantist. It's only important that the Francis is a heretic, and that's that. And even though he is a non-Catholic, he should still be focused on incessantly and obsessively, though in reality he's just some guy in Rome claiming to be the Pope.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9543
    • Reputation: +6256/-940
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #73 on: August 02, 2022, 09:55:52 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • focused on incessantly and obsessively… blah, blah, blah sedevacantismblah, blah, blah sedevacantistsblah, blah, blah sedesblah, blah, blah sedevacantismblah, blah, blah sedesblah, blah, blah sedevacantistsblah, blah, blah sedes

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Breaking: Taylor Marshall now questioning Bergoglio's legitimacy
    « Reply #74 on: August 02, 2022, 10:06:34 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • All great points, bravo.

    The thing that got me away from Ripperger was his constant revealing of what information he received from demons during exorcisms and how he then turns around and applies it to current events. There was one such instance where he claimed that a demon said things were coming to a head soon (paraphrasing) and I had to ask "so we're using the Roman Ritual for divination now?"

    On top of that, his complete blindness to the situation with Bergoglio and adherence to the NO conservative party line just made me swear off of him altogether.

    I've always had a bit of an issue with this.  My understanding had been that Catholic priests were instructed never to interact with demons apart from performing the Rite of Exorcism.  And one of the first rules is that DEMONS LIE.  So you can't really put much stock in anything they say.