This is so funny!

Thanks for bringing this up.  I didn't want to mention it, but yes, Grant is a Jєωιѕн book peddler.

That a Jєω is doing translations on Catholic works is a bit concerning. 

Recall a translation by Jєω for Penguin books on the antique book by Bernal Diaz's titled: "The Conquest of New Spain" 
This is a fantastic diary story of Hernando Cortes' Montezuma campaign.  Diaz was there.

Well in one small citation, the Franciscans on the campaign make note that the pagan idol statuary in all the Aztec temples appeared to look the same.
The Friars thought they were of judaic origin.  This was a bombshell, implying that ritual human sacrifice was taught to the Aztecs by the Jєωs, from the Diaspora. 

I always wondered what the original text of Bernal Diaz's book contained about the Jєωs and suspected that the tranlsator had conveniently deleted Diaz's more incriminating diary entrees?

Ryan Grant admitted it on "The Rundown".  He looks Jєωιѕн too and a number of The Rundown fans know it and jokingly chide him for it.

Actually, Ryan Grant has admitted multiple times he is of Jєωιѕн descent. And so what? Ought we not judge people on the basis of their actions and statements? I feel that we should be charitable to those especially when they contribute to (traditional) Catholic culture in positive ways- like translating books (Belleramine, Alphonsus), otherwise unavailable to those of us who don't speak latin.

Granted, of course.

But there are facts to be considered.

A simple google search reveals that Grant is an editor at TAN books. We know the new TAN and the old TAN are not the same entity.

Grant is an author at OnePeter5, the very same entity that promotes Doc Kwack.

As I said above, he is a pas de deux with Chad Ripperger, and I think, translates many of the books peddled by Ripperger.

Now if you go over to a website called liberchristo, you will find that it trains novus ordo priests, deacons, and layfolk to be exorcists or exorcists' helpers. And that is not all you will find. Go to the section entitled Videos:

https://www.liberchristo.org/videos/

You will see some talks by Ripperger, but even more talks by one Kyle Clement, a layman. Listen to him, and it won't take you long to discern that he is a charismatic and inserts charismania into his trainings.

That is not just a run of the mill "NO beware" red flag. It is a smoking gun, as we know that charismania is identical to new age channeling. Charismania in an exorcism setting presents to my mind an extreme danger to the poor person already being manipulated and handled by exorcists without valid orders, and who come to them via deceit, i.e., through the vector of the illegitimate and satanic authority of a non-Catholic, infidel sect.

I've always found Ripperger to be a mixed bag, but I was frankly shocked to see that he actually associates himself with charismania in his "deliverance ministry." This caused me to decide to finally avoid him completely, after years of head scratching because of the strange things he often says. 

None of these facts point to lineage as reasons for caution. They are concerning on their own merits. But when lineage is linked up with concerning behavior, that fact enhances rather than lessens concerns; because sad experience teaches us to be very leery of the "conversions" of these people.

Bottom line: Grant and all of his affiliates work for NovusOrdo Inc. They work to keep the the false hierarchy of the novus ordo in power, and to keep Catholics subjected to infidel overlords. You may rest assured that they also work behind the scenes to keep real Catholics out of the media and out of the publishing profession. It's the mafia, again and again.

These compromised "Catholics" dominate the airwaves and throw us dogs crumbs. They make sure the integral Faith has no wide audience. They do not defend the Faith. Rather they offer just enough truth to keep people from leaving the burning building. I would call them Halflings, but that would be an insult to Hobbits.

Well, at least you didn't call me a heretic and schismatic, as you often do with those who refuse to convert to sedevacantism.

  I've never said it was heresy not to be SV, but then nuances aren't your thing.  I was denouncing various articulations of R&R made by some here on the board.  Archbishop Lefebvre's position there was nothing wrong with, nor with that of the earlier SSPX, and Father Chazal's theology is rock solid.  But then I can't expect you to understand the distinctions here.  You just hear "sede" and have some Pavlovian reaction ... even though it's an absurd term, because everyone is a "sede", including the "sedeplenists".

Nor have I every commented on your position ... as I don't even know what it is.  You just make this hit and run denunciatioins of "sedes" but have never actually presented anything of substance.

And the Novus Ordo Catholics get a free pass, right? They are not heretics and/or schismatics, since they believe that Francis is the Pope, and they follow him. Such is the nuttiness of the sedevacanist view. Or at least your particular brand of sedevacanist view.