CathInfo.com

I never thought of that.  That would certainly seem a good way of looking at it, although I had always thought that the suggestion of an imposter for Paul VI was not really plausible whereas the suggestion of an imposter for Sr. Lucia always seemed to me to be not only plausible, but quite probable.

Hmm...now I think I took his comment the wrong way...lol.  

I thought he was saying that investigating the Paul VI impostor was dumb, but he did say he thought "this" was the dumbest thing "since" (and then he posted the Paul VI impostor link). So it does seem as if he is saying the topic of the OP is what is dumb.  I don't understand how investigating rather than just theorizing "this" is dumb.

So I guess that leaves us both still wondering what he meant.   8)

There WAS an Imposter. On the Day of the Miracle of the Sun, We Publish Our First of Many Expert Reports. A Plastic Surgeon's Judgment on the Case of the Two Sister Lucys.

October 12, 2018

"On the 101st anniversary of Our Lady of Fatima, we are presenting one expert report on the issue of an imposter Sister Lucia. Hopefully, the release of this report demonstrates that we are approaching this issue very seriously and have engaged some of the top doctors, scientists, and companies in the world. There will be much more to come, and we need your support now more than ever. The investigation is intensifying.

 As seen in this report (and others) the analysis of the photographic images refers to Subject A (0-18 years old), Subject B (20-40 years), Subject C (60 years old), and Subject D (75 years+). Attached is an example of a photograph from each Subject. There are the four groups we divided the images into to organize the analysis. We are currently of the opinion that Subject A and Subject B are the same individual. We are also relatively confident (though not certain) that Subject C and Subject D are the same individual. As Dr. Garcia notes, we are confident Subject A/B depict a different individual than the individual(s) depicted in Subject C/D. Much more analysis to come!

 A few highlights of Dr. Garcia's analysis:

• Dr. Garcia possesses a degree in art history and is of Hispanic descent giving him a unique background to assess this question.
• Dr. Garcia is the individual who first identified the presence of a fake image that has been previously discussed on this site.
• Dr. Garcia thinks that multiple items suggest a different individual but the strongest evidence is the chin and eyelids. He also thinks the noses are different.

Here is Dr. Garcia's Report: ...