That is roughly 50 pictures.
Whatever the "comprehensive and definite report" may say, the pictures used must be published, as well as the numerical results of every single comparison.
Otherwise the whole thing is worthless.
work for money to please their customers.
I won't trust any report, if I can't compare their machine-comparison-results with my own human assessment.
I agree that we should be able to use our own human assessment. After all, that's what the supposed professional investigators are using too. They still have to use human assessment.
I have to wonder if this type of result can be used in, say, a court of law in order to prove absolutely that a person is or isn't who they were purported to be. Or is it just considered evidence?
That being said, it is possible of course that there's been a fake sister Lucy presented as the real Sr. Lucy. But whichever it is, we still have to be mindful of not being too sidetracked by issues that won't really change anything. We still have to do as Our Lady requested - to offer prayer and penance, especially for sinners, and that should include (IMO) the Modernist sect that currently occupies the Church.