Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi  (Read 18812 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6882
  • Reputation: +3852/-406
  • Gender: Male
  • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
« Reply #90 on: January 05, 2014, 07:03:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One of the more common occurrences on this forum is SJB calling someone an idiot, or the equivalent of that. I guess we must all be a bunch of morons. I wonder why he suffers us. It must be his supernatural charity.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.

    Offline Alcuin

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 269
    • Reputation: +91/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #91 on: January 05, 2014, 07:11:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Alcuin
    Quote from: SJB
    You've yet to show us any Catholic authority who has ever explained things the way you claim are "as written." You reject any and all authority and rely solely on yourself.


    Note SJB can't show a Catholic authority explaining things regarding the way he sees Vatican II.

    He uses this as a tactic to waste people's time and divert attention from the real issues. He does this without making any useful contribution.


    Only an idiot would say what you say here in the very midst of a crisis. Of course there's no judgment from authority ... It's a crisis situation!

    Sometimes I wonder where people like you come from ...


    So you resort to name calling now.

    And you're further diverting. Which theologians see Vatican II the way you do?

    Name them now or get off threads discussing BoD - some people here are interested in discussing these matters.


    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #92 on: January 05, 2014, 08:34:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matto
    One of the more common occurrences on this forum is SJB calling someone an idiot, or the equivalent of that. I guess we must all be a bunch of morons. I wonder why he suffers us. It must be his supernatural charity.


    No, not at all. Quite infrequently actually, but some of you have proven yourselves to be just that.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #93 on: January 05, 2014, 08:36:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: Alcuin
    Quote from: SJB
    You've yet to show us any Catholic authority who has ever explained things the way you claim are "as written." You reject any and all authority and rely solely on yourself.


    Note SJB can't show a Catholic authority explaining things regarding the way he sees Vatican II.

    He uses this as a tactic to waste people's time and divert attention from the real issues. He does this without making any useful contribution.


    Only an idiot would say what you say here in the very midst of a crisis. Of course there's no judgment from authority ... It's a crisis situation!

    Sometimes I wonder where people like you come from ...


    Anything but answer what I actually said, Alcuin.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline Alcuin

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 269
    • Reputation: +91/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #94 on: January 05, 2014, 08:49:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SJB, very simply. You are on record as stating that the Church's approved theologians cannot be in error. So, very simply name the approved theologians who have come to the same conclusions about Vatican II that you have.

    If you cannot name anyone then please stop derailing BoD threads. Put up or shut up, your credibility is on the line here.


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14705
    • Reputation: +6059/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #95 on: January 06, 2014, 04:24:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote
    I already told you, the sources you keep asking for are the very sources you keep rejecting. A vicious circle really. Have you read V1 yet? Where is your source that taught you that of all things, dogmas need to be interpreted?

    Why are you a Catholic when there is another way into heaven? Particularly when the other roads to get there are so much wider, smoother and have a whole lot less pot holes. If you believe there's another way, you should join those on the easier road, protesting the whole way against being a member of a Church that mandates it's members adhere to purity, sacrifice, faith, prayer, fasting, penance and obedience - to name only a few.

    Why fight temptations and deprive yourself of the pleasures when you can have the pleasures and salvation too?

    Go ahead, join the rest if you want to - you are so sure that some other persons can make it who are outside of the Church, then if they can make it, certainly you can make it. So what holds you back?


    You've yet to show us any Catholic authority who has ever explained things the way you claim are "as written." You reject any and all authority and rely solely on yourself.


    You do not consider magisterial pronouncements as authoritative because you believe the Church must submit to the judgement of her subjects. I assume you do this through no fault of your own so it's all good.


    Quote from: SJB

    I might also point out the very essence of your post is to discourage a life of purity, sacrifice, faith, prayer, fasting, penance and obedience. For a serious person who might be truly struggling with an invincible ignorance of the duty of joining the Church, you sound like a man who discounts any such struggle and instead is supremely critical of such a person as if he didn't even have a chance at salvation. You challenge those who disagree with you to become an apostate, which is disgusting.



    Your argument is both ambiguous and untenable via your own silly belief.
    FYI, a serious person who is struggling in invincible ignorance of the duty of joining the Church is already saved according to you - there is nothing that, according to you, can possibly change that fact. According to you, the Church teaches this.

    You crack me up the way you predictably weasel out of every question and challenge. Read what was written as it is written - - -I ASKED *YOU* why are *YOU* a Catholic if there is any other way? Why are you more concerned about the salvation of someone else before your own salvation?




    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14705
    • Reputation: +6059/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #96 on: January 06, 2014, 04:36:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matto
    One of the more common occurrences on this forum is SJB calling someone an idiot, or the equivalent of that. I guess we must all be a bunch of morons. I wonder why he suffers us. It must be his supernatural charity.


    But he probably did not mean what he said. Hard to tell with him.

    He needs his posts to be run through some type of interpreter so that the things he says can be explained. Otherwise we can be sure he only means what he says, sometimes; other times he certainly does not mean what he says at all, still other times the things he says may sound like he means one thing, but he really means something completely different. SJB speaks just like de fide canons, infallible declarations and Church teaching.

    It's all about what he means and your interpretation of it - hence the need for an interpreter to explain what he posts.
     :facepalm:
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #97 on: January 06, 2014, 07:54:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stubborn
    You do not consider magisterial pronouncements as authoritative because you believe the Church must submit to the judgement of her subjects. I assume you do this through no fault of your own so it's all good.


    The Church isn't a collection of Canons and Decrees that you get to interpret, which is exactly what you are doing. This is why I ask you to show us where you got your understanding of the dogma of EENS. Surely, it was taught and explained by some living Catholic authority.

    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil


    Offline Alcuin

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 269
    • Reputation: +91/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #98 on: January 06, 2014, 08:02:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: stubborn
    You do not consider magisterial pronouncements as authoritative because you believe the Church must submit to the judgement of her subjects. I assume you do this through no fault of your own so it's all good.


    The Church isn't a collection of Canons and Decrees that you get to interpret, which is exactly what you are doing. This is why I ask you to show us where you got your understanding of the dogma of EENS. Surely, it was taught and explained by some living Catholic authority.


     :facepalm:

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14705
    • Reputation: +6059/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #99 on: January 06, 2014, 08:34:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Alcuin
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: stubborn
    You do not consider magisterial pronouncements as authoritative because you believe the Church must submit to the judgement of her subjects. I assume you do this through no fault of your own so it's all good.


    The Church isn't a collection of Canons and Decrees that you get to interpret, which is exactly what you are doing. This is why I ask you to show us where you got your understanding of the dogma of EENS. Surely, it was taught and explained by some living Catholic authority.


     :facepalm:


    Yes,  :facepalm:
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #100 on: January 06, 2014, 10:48:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    Quote from: Alcuin
    Quote from: SJB
    Quote from: stubborn
    You do not consider magisterial pronouncements as authoritative because you believe the Church must submit to the judgement of her subjects. I assume you do this through no fault of your own so it's all good.


    The Church isn't a collection of Canons and Decrees that you get to interpret, which is exactly what you are doing. This is why I ask you to show us where you got your understanding of the dogma of EENS. Surely, it was taught and explained by some living Catholic authority.


     :facepalm:


    Yes,  :facepalm:


    Yes, the “face palm” tells us what you really believe. This is why I maintain you two are, in the most charitable judgment, simply not very bright. You believe you are infallible in reading the Popes and Trent and Vatican I, yet NOBODY agrees with your interpretation.

    You can't tell us what Trent means, and then when asked to provide one authoritative source who agrees with your interpretation, point us back to Trent. That is what is circular, yet I don't think you're intelligent enough to see it. Bower is a little sharper than you, but not much, and I think Ladislaus knows both of you are significantly challenged, to put it gently.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil


    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14705
    • Reputation: +6059/-904
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #101 on: January 06, 2014, 12:24:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • All that from a guy who thinks the Church teaches there really is salvation outside the Catholic Church - as if She would even need to even make that  declaration.
     :facepalm:
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #102 on: January 06, 2014, 01:02:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    All that from a guy who thinks the Church teaches there really is salvation outside the Catholic Church - as if She would even need to even make that  declaration.
     :facepalm:


    He's a Heroin BODer, a determinist who believes that someone can be saved who has no explicit desire to be baptized or be a Catholic, nor belief in Christ or the Trinity. He believes that these people, who die believing themselves to be Jews, Moslem, Hindu, Buddhists, are really Catholics without knowing it, and so are inside of the Church. Therefore, he will tell you that he does not deny EENS.

    Quote from: bowler
    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/13Jun/jun3ftt.htm

    No Salvation Outside the Church
     
    "Tough luck, dude, if you were not baptized with water!"  

     


    The title says it all "Tough luck, dude, if you were not baptized with water!"  

    The Heroin BODer is a determinist, he believes that God has no control over the events in our lives. Therefore, they see the clear dogmas on EENS and the sacrament of baptism, and they say it is uncharitable to "interpret" them as they are written, that people who believe thus are saying ""Tough luck, dude, if you were not baptized with water!"  

    That is the bottom line, the Heroin BODer is a determinist, being determinists believe that:

    - someone is born by pure chance in a place far away.
    Answer: No one is born by chance in a place other than EXACTLY where God's providence put them.

    - they believe that they saved themselves by learning the faith, but that their neighbor did not have the same teachers/opportunity.
    Answer - The Heroin BODer did practically NOTHING to get their "knowledge", it ALL came from God's Grace. Even their accepting God's Grace came from God. When they go to their final judgement, they will then know that all  they did was maybe lean 1/10 of 1 degree toward God, and He did the rest. God provides the same to all persons. But the Heroin BODer does not believe that. They believe that there are people who by chance (determinist) may be lost.

    - the Heroin BODer, as a determinist, believes that the Holy Ghost would make all the clear dogmatic decrees on EENS and the Sacrament of Baptism, and NEVER ONCE teaching any form of baptism of desire infallibly, while at the same time EVERY SINGLE clear dogmatic decree does not mean what they say. In other words, they believe that God from before he created the world, thought of this "system" of teaching infallible something which does  not mean what it says. AFTERALL, the Heroin BODer believes that  someone can be saved who has no belief in Christ and the Trinity, nor has any explicit desire to be baptized, or to be a Catholic. Only a determinist could come up with such a "god", a god who has no control over the events  of life, a god who's grace is useless.


    see see http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=29140&f=9&min=0&num=5

    Quote from: bowler
    "Before all decision to create the world, the infinite knowledge of God presents to Him all the graces, and different series of graces, which He can prepare for each soul, along with the consent or refusal which would follow in each circuмstance, and that in millions of possible combinations ... Thus, for each man in particular there are in the thought of God, limitless possible histories, some histories of virtue and salvation, others of crime and damnation; and God will be free in choosing such a world, such a series of graces, and in determining the future history and final destiny of each soul. And this is precisely what He does when among all possible worlds, by an absolutely free act, he decides to realize the actual world with all the circuмstances of its historic evolutions, with all the graces which in fact have been and will be distributed until the end of the world, and consequently with all the elect and all the reprobate who God foresaw would be in it if de facto He created it." [The Catholic Encyclopedia Appleton, 1909, on Augustine, pg 97]


    In other words before a man is conceived, God in his infinite knowledge has already put that person through the test with millions of possible combinations and possible histories, some histories of virtue and salvation, others of crime and damnation;along with the consent or refusal which would follow in each circuмstance (of millions of possible combinations!!!) and God will be free in determining which future history and final destiny He assigns each soul.


    The idea of salvation outside the Church is opposed to the Doctrine of Predestination. This Doctrine means that from all eternity God has known who were His own. It is for the salvation of these, His Elect, that Providence has directed, does direct, and will always direct, the affairs of men and the events of history. Nothing, absolutely nothing, that happens, has not been taken into account by the infinite God, and woven into that tapestry in which is written the history of the salvation of His saints. Central in this providential overlordship is the Church itself, which is the sacred implement which God devised for the rescuing of His beloved ones from the damnation decreed for those who would not. (Mt. 23:37).

    The Doctrine of Divine Election means that only certain individuals will be saved.  They will be saved primarily because, in the inscrutable omniscience of God, only certain individuals out of all the human family will respond to the grace of salvation. In essence, this doctrine refers to what in terms of human understanding and vision, is before and after, the past, the present, and the future, but what in God is certain knowledge and unpreventable fact, divine action and human response.

    Calvin and others have made the mistake of believing that these words mean that predestination excludes human choice and dispenses from true virtue. Catholic doctrine explains simply that the foreknowledge of God precedes the giving of grace. It means, further, that, since without grace there can be no merit, and without merit no salvation, those who will be saved must be foreknown as saved by God, if they are to receive the graces necessary for salvation.

    Those who say there is salvation outside the Church (no matter how they say it) do not comprehend that those who are in the Church have been brought into it by the Father, through Christ the Savior, in fulfillment of His eternal design to save them. The only reason that God does not succeed in getting others into the Church must be found in the reluctant will of those who do not enter it. If God can arrange for you to be in the Church, by the very same Providence He can arrange for anyone else who desires or is willing to enter it. There is absolutely no obstacle to the invincible God's achieving His designs, except the intractable wills of His children. Nothing prevents His using the skies for his billboard, and the clouds for lettering, or the rolling thunder for the proclamation of His word. (Indeed, for believers, He does just this: "The heavens shew forth the glory of God, and the firmament declareth the work of his hands." I Ps. 18: 11. But for atheists the heavens have no message at all.) If poverty were the reason some do not believe, he could load them down with diamonds; if youth were the reason, He could make sure they grew to a hoary old age. If it were merely the want of information, put a library on their doorstep, or a dozen missionaries in their front room. Were it for a want of brains, he could give every man an I.Q. of three hundred: it would cost Him nothing.

    The idea that someone died before he was able to receive Baptism, suggests that God was unable to control events, so as to give the person time to enter the Church. If time made any difference, God could and would keep any person on earth a hundred, or a thousand, or ten thousand years.

    Thus, what is the meaning of this election? That from all eternity God has ordered the events of history, so that His Elect might have the grace of salvation. And how do they know of this election? By the fact that they are in the Church, through no deservingness of their own? They know of no reason why God should bestow this grace, the knowledge of the truth, and the willingness and power to believe it, upon them, while others, who seem more worthy, go without it. As regards His Elect, not only has God determined to bestow necessary grace, but also, all His actions in the world must be seen as part of His salvific plan. In a word, nothing that He does is unrelated to the salvation of His Beloved Sheep. Human history, apart from the glory of Holy Church, and the salvation of the Elect, and the punishment of the wicked, has little importance for almighty God. Yet, all these purposes are only a part of the manifestation of His glory.

    Those who speak of it have the problem of reconciling the mystery of Predestination with the idea of "baptism of desire." From all eternity, almighty God has known the fate of every soul. In His Providence, He has arranged for the entrance into the Church of certain millions of persons, and has seen to it that they receive the grace of faith, the Sacrament of Baptism, the grace of repentance, the forgiveness of their sins, and all the other requisites of salvation. According to The Attenuators, in the case of "non Catholic saints," and of those who died before they might receive Baptism, God was simply unable to see to these necessaries. Untoward and unforeseen circuмstances arose which prevented His providing these other millions with the means of salvation. Theirs is a story of supreme irony, that although the God of omniscience and omnipotence mastered the history of all nations and the course of every life, angelic and human, in the case of certain ones, His timing was off by just a few days, or hours, or minutes. It was His earlier intention to make sure that they received Baptism of water; He had it all planned out; but alas! on the particular day of their demise, His schedule was so full, that He simply could not get to them; for which reason, in that it was His fault, He is bound to provide an alternative instrumentality: "baptism of desire" is his substitute for the real thing!

    The Diluters of the Doctrine of Exclusive Salvation do not perceive the Pelagian tenor of their position, that some may be saved outside the Church through nothing but their good will. It is exactly because this is impossible  and, more important, offensive to God, that the notion must be
     rejected. We say impossible, because no man can save himself. The fact that every man must receive Baptism and thus enter the Church means that he is dependent upon God to make it possible for him to receive the Sacrament, and further, through this Sacrament, it is Christ Who acts to purge the sinner of his sins, and ingraft him into His Mystical Body. No individual can do this by himself. He is dependent upon another to pour the water and say the words, and he is dependent upon God to provide this minister, and to make the sacramental sign effective of grace. It is thus so that none may attribute his salvation to his own doing.
     
    Pride is the chief vice of man, as it was and is of the demons of Hell. It is pride more than any other fault that blinds men to the truth, that obstructs faith, and hardens their hearts to conversion from sin.

    The Doctrine of Predestination is that almighty God from all eternity both knew and determined who would be saved, that is, who would allow Him to save them. He would be the cause of their salvation, and, as there is no power that can even faintly obstruct or withstand Him, there is no power which can prevent His saving whom He wishes, except, of course, the man himself.









    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #103 on: January 06, 2014, 04:48:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Stubborn
    All that from a guy who thinks the Church teaches there really is salvation outside the Catholic Church - as if She would even need to even make that  declaration.
     :facepalm:


    You're proving again how you have your very own understanding of Church teaching and misrepresent those who oppose your mistaken interpretations.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi
    « Reply #104 on: January 06, 2014, 04:50:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    He's a Heroin BODer, a determinist who believes that someone can be saved who has no explicit desire to be baptized or be a Catholic, nor belief in Christ or the Trinity. He believes that these people, who die believing themselves to be Jews, Moslem, Hindu, Buddhists, are really Catholics without knowing it, and so are inside of the Church. Therefore, he will tell you that he does not deny EENS.


    And anybody who reads what I have consistently posted here over the past years will see that you are a liar.
    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil