It seems Bocca cares quite a bit about his banning since he "sent" you (as if you and he were not the same person) to post about such an "unjust" banning here. (Did it detract from online traffic to your calumnious blog?)
The thing is, this is first and foremost an SSPX-Resistance forum, not a sedevacantist, or Catholic fringe forum. You (or Bocca's) disrespectful reference to the good Bishop Williamson, being the head of the Resistance, as anything but Bishop solidify Matthew's decision to ban you. Furthermore, Bocca's posts didn't really contribute much else than to provide a verbose muddying of the already murky waters of traditional Catholic ecclesiology.
Second, Matthew owns the forum and he is free to ban whosoever he wishes, justly or unjustly.
Third, Lad's endorsement of the idea of traditional clergy having no authority is not at all the same as your "defrocking" of traditional clergy by refusing to refer to them with their specific titles.