Author Topic: Bishop Williamson  (Read 646 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8525
  • Reputation: +1094/-833
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Williamson
« on: October 31, 2012, 06:36:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    Below are comments from Mike Cain on the letter of Bishop Williamson linked above.  BTW did Bishop Williamson always refer to Ratzinger as Benedict 16 without "Pope" in front of it or is this something new:

    We've been expecting it for years. It's been building to a boil and only a boiled frog would not recognize the inevitable. Since 1983 many scratched their heads that the elect within the Society didn't see the inevitable that recognizing and resisting never works. Never has, never will. "The Nine" understood this and acted according to de fide logic and sensus Catholicus . So also have several since, especially over the past year when they did, in fact, connect the dots. Now we can only hope and pray that with all the chaos within the SSPX, wiser heads will realize there is only one answer to the solution: The Chair is empty. If not, then as the Society has said for so many years, What we believed before that we thought was right is now wrong. You know they would never say that, but how then can they reconcile with wrong? They can't and still remain Catholic. That is one of the main points Bishop Richard Williamson brings out in his official response to the following Communiqué approved by Superior General Bishop Bernard Fellay of the Society of St. Pius X in which Bishop Williamson turns the tables and calls for Fellay to step down for Williamson refuses to recognize an unjust expulsion:

        So the exclusion from the Society of St Pius X of one of the four bishops consecrated for its service by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988 is now official. It is a momentous decision on the part of the SSPX leaders, not for any personal reasons, but because of the removal of what many people took to be the single biggest obstacle within the SSPX to any false reconciliation between Catholic Tradition and Conciliar Rome. Now that he is gone, the SSPX may the more easily continue its slide into comfortable liberalism.

        If the problem was merely his person, there might be no serious consequences. He is 72 years old (and "more or less gaga") with not too many active years left ahead of him. He could be safely ignored, or further discredited if need be, and left to rant and rave in his isolated retirement. But if indeed his exclusion does mean the repudiation of that opposition to Rome which he represented, then the SSPX is in trouble, and far from resolving its interior tensions by having made an example of him, it is liable now to be racked with silent dissension or open contradiction.

        This is because Archbishop Lefebvre founded the SSPX to resist the Council's destruction of the Catholic Faith by its 16 documents, and of the practice of that Faith by the New Mass above all. Resisting the Council was built into the very nature of the Society. Now to undo a thing's nature is to undo the thing. It would follow that with this exclusion the SSPX of Archbishop Lefebvre is well on its way to being undone, and it will be replaced by something quite different. Actually that transformation has been observable for many years. The exclusion is merely one final blow.

        Not that the Archbishop was primarily, or only, against the Council. Primarily he was Catholic, a Catholic bishop, a true pastor of souls, as is clear from his writings prior to the Council. But once that unspeakable disaster for the Church had taken place, he soon saw that the most urgent task in defence of the Faith was to resist the Vatican II Revolution which was taking over millions and millions of Catholic hearts and minds. Hence his founding in 1970 of the SSPX which would use exclusively the Tridentine rite of Mass. Hence his famous Declaration of November, 1974, which was like a charter of the Catholic principles inspiring the SSPX's resistance. Only the conversion and reversion of the Church authorities to the true Faith can justify the abandoning of those principles. And has such a conversion or reversion taken place? By no means. On the contrary.

        And the future? To fill the vacuum left by abandoning the purposes of the Archbishop, probably the mainstream SSPX now hastens into the arms of Rome, especially if Benedict XVI's conscience is driving him to end the "schism" before he dies. The bishop's exclusion may or may not have been a pre-condition set by Rome for a Rome-SSPX agreement, but in any case it certainly favours one. SSPX priests who see clear might lie low for the moment and wait for a flock of chickens to begin to come home to roost. SSPX laity might attend SSPX Masses for the time being, but they should watch out for the moment when the transformation mentioned above begins to threaten their faith. As for the excluded bishop, any donations to him or his cause will have to wait a little until the necessary arrangements can be set up. But be sure of one thing: he is not thinking of retiring.

        Hang tight, everybody. We are in for one "helluva" ride. Let's just make that a ride to Heaven!

    Kyrie eleison.

    To subscribe to Bishop Williamson's weekly Eleison Comments, write His Excellency to be put on the list at Subscribe to Letters

    [Editor's Note: Bold and links added for emphasis and identification.]
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16