Author Topic: Bishop Mark Pivarunas - Bishop Francis Konrad Schuckardt (Read 9773 times)

Emerentiana · « **Reply #30 on:** November 01, 2011, 12:12:36 AM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: Emerentiana
He was only a young boy when the Schukardt scandal was going on...As a boy he survived the scandal...

For the record...

He was 26 (born in 1958) when Schuckardt was sent packing (1984).

Oh, so what Gladius! Hope you are not starting up again. We never hear from you unless you can link some scandal to SGG.
Please do not go into this again.
BTW, all, Bishop Pivarunus is the third father general of the congregation. Fr Denis Chicoine was the first. He took over after Schukardt left. Fr Puskorius was the second.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #31 on:** November 01, 2011, 06:13:45 AM »

Quote from: Emerentiana

Quote from: gladius_veritatis
He was 26 (born in 1958) when Schuckardt was sent packing (1984).

Oh, so what Gladius! Hope you are not starting up again. We never hear from you unless you can link some scandal to SGG.

Calm down, woman. I was merely pointing out that your comment about his being a boy during all the hubbub was not exactly accurate.

While I understand that it is no cause for merit and does not mean much, the fact is that I have more posts than ANY other member about matters that have nothing to do with sgg.org/cult. Even if you got rid of ALL my posts that have anything to with sgg.org/cult, I'd still have more posts than anyone besides Matthew. Your comment is, again, more than a little inaccurate.

[FWIW, you might reconsider making every single post in bold...but tis your call.]

Carry on...

sedetrad · « **Reply #32 on:** November 01, 2011, 11:30:04 AM »

Roman theology is not Patrick Pollock. Patrick as far as I know is a sede that is a homealoner and a feeney follower. Roman theology is not a sede.

romantheology · « **Reply #33 on:** November 01, 2011, 12:57:41 PM »

Papa Benedict XVI is Apostolic Supreme.

Patrick Pollock and Dr. William DeTucci wrote a book called:

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/communicatio-in-sacris/4818965?productTrackingContext=search_results/search_shelf/center/1

DeTucci I think taught before at the Angelicuм.

Communicatio in Sacris the book I do admit is highly scholarly and far surpasses anything palargist writers like Cekada have written who just pretty much copies and pastes from pre-vatican II authors.

But these guys are all heretics no matter what as SSPX runs Supreme.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #34 on:** November 01, 2011, 03:21:17 PM »

romantheology, why are you trying to ruin people's reputations? What you're doing is spreading calumny.

SJB · « **Reply #35 on:** November 01, 2011, 04:33:27 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: Emerentiana
Quote from: gladius_veritatis
He was 26 (born in 1958) when Schuckardt was sent packing (1984).

Oh, so what Gladius! Hope you are not starting up again. We never hear from you unless you can link some scandal to SGG.

Calm down, woman. I was merely pointing out that your comment about his being a boy during all the hubbub was not exactly accurate.

While I understand that it is no cause for merit and does not mean much, the fact is that I have more posts than ANY other member about matters that have nothing to do with sgg.org/cult. Even if you got rid of ALL my posts that have anything to with sgg.org/cult, I'd still have more posts than anyone besides Matthew. Your comment is, again, more than a little inaccurate.

[FWIW, you might reconsider making every single post in bold...but tis your call.]

Carry on...

This is precisely why this type of stuff CANNOT be discussed here without chaos being the result. Emerentiana, you are totally out of line here. A man of 26 is NOT a boy, and you need to accept the correction, admitting this FACT and then be silent.

romantheology · « **Reply #36 on:** November 01, 2011, 06:10:10 PM »

I 2nd that.

SJB · « **Reply #37 on:** November 02, 2011, 06:35:02 AM »

Quote from: romantheology

I 2nd that.

And you are another reason there can be no truly charitable and intelligent discussion here.

Lighthouse · « **Reply #38 on:** November 02, 2011, 12:53:57 PM »

rt:

Quote

Communicatio in Sacris the book I do admit is highly scholarly and far surpasses anything palargist writers like Cekada have written who just pretty much copies and pastes from pre-vatican II authors.

Some questions:

By "palargist" I assume you mean plagiarist. It means stealing someone else's work without proper attribution. Where has C done this?

"Copies and pastes from pre-vatican II...". Sounds like an excellent procedure as long as proper context and intent of original is observed. What do you see as its flaws? Do you demand novelty in your theological reading? See where that has gotten us.

"...the book I do admit is highly scholarly..." What are your criteria for judging (or admitting) that a book qualifies for such. What are your qualifications? I tend to think of "scholarly" as an adjective that does not work well with qualifiers. Do you have opinions that would judge something as moderately scholarly? Sort of scholarly?

Does "roman theology" have something to do with your feelings about your own qualifications? Do you have any qualifications you'd like to mention?

roscoe · « **Reply #39 on:** November 02, 2011, 02:34:16 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: gladius_veritatis
Quote from: Emerentiana
Quote from: gladius_veritatis
He was 26 (born in 1958) when Schuckardt was sent packing (1984).

Oh, so what Gladius! Hope you are not starting up again. We never hear from you unless you can link some scandal to SGG.

Calm down, woman. I was merely pointing out that your comment about his being a boy during all the hubbub was not exactly accurate.

While I understand that it is no cause for merit and does not mean much, the fact is that I have more posts than ANY other member about matters that have nothing to do with sgg.org/cult. Even if you got rid of ALL my posts that have anything to with sgg.org/cult, I'd still have more posts than anyone besides Matthew. Your comment is, again, more than a little inaccurate.

[FWIW, you might reconsider making every single post in bold...but tis your call.]

Carry on...

This is precisely why this type of stuff CANNOT be discussed here without chaos being the result. Emerentiana, you are totally out of line here. A man of 26 is NOT a boy, and you need to accept the correction, admitting this FACT and then be silent.

It is this kind of thing that demonstrates the insincerity of the CMRI/SGG crowd. I doubt there will be an apology.

2Vermont · « **Reply #40 on:** October 25, 2015, 09:32:45 AM »

This OP sounds familiar......

LucasL · « **Reply #41 on:** October 25, 2015, 07:54:49 PM »

What I find interesting is that as much as this person who is attacking the Bishop is wrong, many here attack him back with "feeneysm" "home aloner" etc are acting the same way.

On one side you have one who is attacking with injustice
on the other side one answers back with injustice

Both sides are wrong.

In fact Fr. Feeney was no theologian or funded any cult.
Second, the fact the one don't attend to Mass on sunday is pretty sad but maybe he lives near a SSPX chapel where the priest don't allow sedevacantists there or he is obsessed to the point where he can't be around SSPX supporters.

Our personal issues should be put aside in this time of great apostasy. Our ego means nothing, I repeat: it means NOTHING and as much good we do is not even close to the good that God gives to us.