First off, Raoul, how do you know that ABL is a loved figure in my community? On the contrary, actually. Believe me, ABL is practically anything but loved where I live. I may have access to two TLMs, but both are over two hours away. I live in a pretty modernist part of the south where just about every Catholic is a Novus Ordite. So I actually live in an area where I have to hear nothing but criticisms of him, not praise.
And I think s2srea has a point. The reason you criticize LeFebvre is so you can make your stance look good. And no offense Raoul, but on the subject of Archbishop LeFebvre you need to get your facts straight. ABL was not an enemy of sedes. He sympathized towards sedes, the only reason you and other sedes see him as an anti-sede is because he chose not to declare Paul VI or JPII as an anti-pope. And how the HECK did he drag people into the Vatican II Church? He never celebrated the Novus Ordo, nor did he have any desire to. Again, you need to get your facts straight on this matter, otherwise you argumnt looks extremely weak.
Also, please explain to me how sedevacantism will be declared a fact. Can you prove it's a fact? No, you cannot. Not unless God revealed to you that He has a preference, and so far we don't know which stance God prefers. I cannot be 100% certain that my non-sede stance is a fact. I am very well aware that the sede stance may be right, I'm just not ready to declare Benedict an anti-pope (although I will concede that Paul VI was an anti-pope). Back to the original subject, I'd be willing to bet, Raoul, that the parish you attend on Sundays wouldn't exist if not for LeFebvre.