Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Bishop Clarence Kelly - Opinions?  (Read 1959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline romantheology

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 86
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Clarence Kelly - Opinions?
« on: November 02, 2011, 12:57:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • More heretical depravity and inconsistence statements from sedevacantists. Just more "opinons"...blah blah blah....

    Bishop Clarence Kelly:

    “ ‘We don’t have an offical position on this,’ [he said, evasively.] ‘We don’t have any authority to settle the question of whether the person [John Paul II] now claiming the papacy is actually the pope. We think it’s perfectly legitimate to raise the question, but we’re not imposing our view as dogma.’ ”


    cf. Communicatio in Sacris by Dr. DeTucci, p. 55

    see also:

    (The Smoke of Satan, by Michael Cuneo, Published by: Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 96 [cf. p. 98, of the same title for Fr. Baumberger’s statement: “It’s not an article of faith for us that John Paul II is a heretic.”] ).
    Logged

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Bishop Clarence Kelly - Opinions?
    « Reply #1 on: November 02, 2011, 07:41:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Fr. Baumberger is a very good and faithful priest.

    About Michael Cuneo--did he write American Exorcism and am I correct in wondering if he has an anti-Catholic bias?
    Logged

    Offline Gregory I

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1542
    • Reputation: +659/-108
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Clarence Kelly - Opinions?
    « Reply #2 on: November 02, 2011, 07:42:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: romantheology
    More heretical depravity and inconsistence statements from sedevacantists. Just more "opinons"...blah blah blah....

    Bishop Clarence Kelly:

    “ ‘We don’t have an offical position on this,’ [he said, evasively.] ‘We don’t have any authority to settle the question of whether the person [John Paul II] now claiming the papacy is actually the pope. We think it’s perfectly legitimate to raise the question, but we’re not imposing our view as dogma.’ ”


    cf. Communicatio in Sacris by Dr. DeTucci, p. 55

    see also:

    (The Smoke of Satan, by Michael Cuneo, Published by: Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 96 [cf. p. 98, of the same title for Fr. Baumberger’s statement: “It’s not an article of faith for us that John Paul II is a heretic.”] ).


    Are you interested in serious dialogue on the plausibility of the view that past few "Popes" have not been such? Or do you just want to shout out a bunch of one-liners like a child?

    Thesis 1: Can a heretic retain office in the church?

    Thesis 2: Is it legitimate to believe that a heretical Pope loses office?

    Thesis 3: Are those who hold such views Schismatic?

    Time and place pal.
    Logged
    'Take care not to resemble the multitude whose knowledge of God's will only condemns them to more severe punishment.'

    -St. John of Avila
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »