Oh yeah, sure, he only publicly promoted breaking the 1st commandment, but hey, at least he was good on the 6th and 9th. 
What he's actually saying is true though. Wojtyla really held the line on moral theology in general. And I believe that was part of the ruse. People perceived him as a great defender of the faith because he (verbally) upheld Catholic moral teaching, and very strongly. We are to pay no attention to the fact that he never DID anything about it. But he snookered the conservative types into believing him an orthodox defender of the faith, a Saint even, a Great one. That was so they'd be more inclined to buy into his religious indifferentism. Wojtyla upheld moral theology (with the exception, as you point out, of the 1st commandment) in order to better enable him to destroy dogmatic theology. And it was successful. You listen to all the more conservative Conciliar types, and they could be as orthodox and Catholic on pretty much every point, but they have ALL imbibed Wojtyla's religious indifferentism. Never before or since has there been a greater purveyor of religious indifferentism than "Saint" John Paul II "the Great". Bergoglio's Pachamama episode looks like childsplay compared to the stuff Wojtyla did along those lines. But now that nearly the entire world has imbibed religious indifferentism, including, alas, most Traditonal Catholics, they roll out Bergoglio to finish off what remains of Catholic moral theology, turning it all into subjectivism and moral relativism. Wojtyla preached a philosophical subjectivism and relativism (his phenomenology), and now Bergoglio has been promoting moral subjectivism. Thus all truth and all morality is defined by each man, and thus each man becomes his own god ... which is precisely the doctrine of Antichrist, as the Dimond brothers have pointed out so well.
Bergoglio is doing this by claiming that the objective morality of the act gives way to the "internal forum". So something that is objectively evil and sinful could be OK if the individual discerns that it's OK, i.e. says it is. So each person becomes his own moral standard, his own god.
So, while Wojtyla paid lip service to Traditional Catholic moral theology, he let errors against it run rampant and never did anything about it. These pro-abortion politicians were never punished even in Wojtyla's day, but kept masquerading as devout Catholics and marching up to receive the Sacraments even back then. Only one who was ever punished or excommunicated under Wojtyla was Archbishop Lefebvre. Heck, even Hans Kung, a notorious heretic, was given a slap on the wrist. He was not excommunicated, defrocked, suspended, or even prevented from teaching at a "Catholic" university. He was simply not allowed to teach "Catholic" theology. So he just moved to a different department and continued on spreading his heresy. For all that Wojtyla promoted the "culture of life," Kung published a book promoting the acceptability of euthanasia ... and was never given more than a slap on the wrist. Charles Curran, same thing, just prevented from teaching "Catholic" theology. So they just renamed his classes, put him in a different department, and he carried on ... undoubtedly prancing up to NO "Holy Communion" as a devout Catholic (can't remember if he was still functioning as a priest). Curran taught every abomination that Wojtyla allegedly condemned: permissibility of birth control (openly dissented with HV), fornication, sodomy ... you name it, he was for it. He was allowed to keep his position at "Catholic" University, and his tenure, but was merely stripped of his "license to teach CATHOLIC theology". What a joke!
Topic: Bergolio to destroy Humanae Vitae (Read 4033 times)