You were already shown that the popes since at least Pius X made it a law that heretic cardinals were to partake in papal elections and on that account could be elected pope. This means you only base this assertion on only your opinion, not Catholic teaching. This truth will remain no matter how often you repeat the same error.
I'm not the one twisting that to mean anything more than it says, unlike you with Pius XII. Even if a heretical cardinal were elected, that election would be null and void because they are heretics. Furthermore, this supposes that the Holy Ghost would ever permit such a thing to occur. Its insane, heretical, and blasphemous.
It is rather remarkable imo, how there is some over-riding mental block in sedes that make them fail to acknowledge the obvious fact that the bolded opinion / statement they all make, changes the meaning of sacred dogma to this:
"Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff unless you do not believe he is the pope."
You honestly do not see this as changing the meaning into something that means absolutely nothing at all?
Again, you're presupposing that Francis et al are legitimate Roman Pontiffs; yet you admit he, and the others, are heretics. I've provided the dogmatic teaching on how the Church views heretics and you keep pointing to some "clause" about heretical cardinals with the insistence that it
must mean the Church, somehow,
contradicted its previous teachings and now allows for heretics to hold legitimate Catholic office, including the papacy.
The reason you don't see this is because you hold to heretical teachings that have obscured the truth to allow for this contradiction of a heretic holding legitimate office. You've proven your pertinacity, and I have nothing more to say to you on the matter.
Topic: Bergolio says that there are many American Catholics who won’t accept Vatican II (Read 45619 times)