The mad man who professes to be the Vicar of Christ, but is in fact the Vicar of Satan, without a doubt deserves to hold title to being one of the worst, arguably worst “mainstream,” heretic to have ever plagued Christianity. 

His falsehoods are only exceeded by his pseudo-pietist hypocrisy and pretentiousness. 

Let us see only a sample of what this blasphemer has taught.

– In his homily at Casa Santa Marta in May 2013, Francis said that even atheists can be saved as long as they do good. (Verdict: heinous heresy).

- “The Son of God became incarnate to instil the feeling of brotherhood in the souls of men.” (Verdict: blasphemy, heresy, and devilish anthropocentrism).

-“Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other…” (Verdict: blasphemy, heresy, and profane).

-“Jesus came to the world to learn to be a man and, being man , to walk with men.” (Heresy, blasphemy, and anthropocentrism).

-On 20 December 2013, but at other times too, he repeatedly said about the Blessed Virgin standing by the cross: “She was silent, but in her heart she told the Lord, ‘You had told me that He would be great, You had told me that You would have given Him the throne of David, His forefather, that He would have reigned forever and now I see Him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’” (Verdict: disgusting blasphemy, heresy, and malicious, malignant calumny).

-In his homily at Casa Santa Marta on 29 May 2015, he said that when the dead body of the Lord Jesus had been taken down from the cross and laid in the arms of the Blessed Virgin, “she remembered what the Angel had said to her: ‘He will be King, He will be great, He will be a prophet…’; and inside surely she wanted to say to the Angel: ‘Liar! I was deceived.’” (Verdict: blasphemy, heresy, calumny, lies, deceit, and profane).

-In an interview for La Repubblica, Bergoglio denied hell. He said: “There is no punishment, but the annihilation of the soul … with the death of the body their journey is finished.” (Verdict: Heresy).

-On 4 April 2017, in an offhand remark Bergoglio said: “Jesus made Himself the devil and the serpent for us.”
(Verdict: apostasy)

-In March 2017, Francis “joked” saying that “Inside the Holy Trinity they’re all arguing behind closed doors, but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”
(Verdict: blasphemy, profanity, and heresy).

-– In May 2018, Francis had a meeting with three ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, victims of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ paedophilia from Chile. He said to one of them: “God made you like this.”
(Verdict: Heresy, blasphemy, and calumny).

Bergoglio makes Arius or Nestorius look like St. Pius X.

Martin Luther would have had him burned at the stake for such blasphemous remarks.

In Wojtylan fashion, the Church would have to apologize to all other heretics of the past if Bergoglio went uncondemned.

Bergoglio makes Arius or Nestorius look like St. Pius X.

Martin Luther would have had him burned at the stake for such blasphemous remarks.

In Wojtylan fashion, the Church would have to apologize to all other heretics of the past if Bergoglio went uncondemned.

Oh undoubtedly. Most of the famous heretics I can think of are paragons of orthodoxy relative to Bergoglio.

May God pass upon him the full extent of His perfect justice sooner rather than later.

Where are RomanTheo (Salza) and Angelus (Siscoe) and ALL of the other RnR shills that constantly tell us sede-anything and anyone with a traditional reading of EENS isn't going to heaven? It blows my mind that charity isn't extended to anyone with honest questions about the origins of the crisis and where those questions might lead but this guy gets a free ride and is "resisted" (whatever that means, it's a cheap boomerism that means complain). Seeing Lad in partcular get called a "Dimondite" all of the time for having very fine grained distinctions about EENS really got me thinking about what RnR is actually about (serious thanks to Lad for articulating some positions I've had but was unsure on).

Shills like Chips & Salza ironically only serve to “radicalize” people more against their intellectually dishonest positions. 

I know many people who left Catholicism altogether because of Bergoglio, even some former Trads. They just couldn’t see how the damage would possibly ever be reversed.

The “bad dad” analogy is poisonous to the mind of any rational person.

The many people, even former trads you know who left Catholicism altogether "because of the pope", in reality lost whatever faith they had because they had no or little faith to begin with, or took whatever faith they had for granted and chose, of their own free will, to leave the narrow path and hop onto the well lit, smooth, wide road. They are the losers, they are the stupid ones, hopefully they come to realize this before they stand before God.

The "bad dad" analogy, like all worthy analogies, is appropriate as an aid for Catholics to help keep the Catholic faith in these times. Look at what happened to the many you know who thought it was poisonous.  Keeping the faith, that's what is necessary, that is what is important and that is what God, by His grace, expects each and every one of us to do regardless of the status of popes, regardless of whatever anyone else says, does or is, God wants and expects us to keep and grow in the faith and provides whatever we need to accomplish this.

You and they can blame the pope in an effort to justify leaving the faith, but that lame excuse won't work with God, not even for a nanosecond.  


 

No, it's because R&R.  If you convince people that a Pope and a Magisterium could be THIS bad, and erroneous, and harmful ... you're left with zero point of having a papacy or a Magisterium.  All those apologetics which use use Our Lord's statement that Peter is the rock on which He will found His Church get immediately undermined if you assert that this man is Peter.  Our Lord set up the papacy to confirm the brethren in the faith ... except when he's actively undermining said faith.

Who is trying to convince people that a Pope and a Magisterium could [not] be THIS bad, and erroneous, and harmful? The sedes that's who. The only mystery is, why?

R&R is a mind-boggling diabolical confusion that is also quite harmful and borderline blasphemous to the Church and to the papacy.

Meanwhile, the sedes believe it an infallible teaching of the Church that the pope is always infallibly safe to follow.