And this is exactly what it amounts to, doesn’t it?

(239) The Pope Speaks! YOU Decide! - YouTube

FYI: Louie V has since taken the Sedevacantist position.  

So, basically what you are saying is that we really don’t need him or any pope for that matter. Correct?

Well, the sedes have been without one for 60 years and far as they're concerned, they are essentially the only ones who have it right, SO YOU TELL ME. 

Aside from that, I think a snip from Who Shall Ascend? is well to insert here for your consideration:

"...So, what is so burdensome about all this? Who, it might be asked, has an easier assignment? Everything has been instituted with incomparable wisdom. After almost two thousand years, the Church has developed into an organization of excellent structure  The doctrine is certain; the moral code is incontrovertible in the main; the divine liturgy has been (had been) refined to a perfection; the code of laws worked. In a word, the spiritual doctrine, the tradition, the authority, the experience, the customs, the supernatural objectives all have been established. With a little prudence and a little caution on the part of the pope, Holy Church will practically run itself!..."

Well, the sedes have been without one for 60 years and far as they're concerned, they are essentially the only ones who have it right, SO YOU TELL ME.

Aside from that, I think a snip from Who Shall Ascend? is well to insert here for your consideration:

"...So, what is so burdensome about all this? Who, it might be asked, has an easier assignment? Everything has been instituted with incomparable wisdom. After almost two thousand years, the Church has developed into an organization of excellent structure  The doctrine is certain; the moral code is incontrovertible in the main; the divine liturgy has been (had been) refined to a perfection; the code of laws worked. In a word, the spiritual doctrine, the tradition, the authority, the experience, the customs, the supernatural objectives all have been established. With a little prudence and a little caution on the part of the pope, Holy Church will practically run itself!..."

No, lets talk about the last 2000 years. You are inferring that we really didn’t need a pope all that time, correct?

LOL. The only use Lefebvrites have for their "popes" is to recoil in horror at their blasphemies.

Would you rather have a father who wants to kill you or no father?

Your flight from your murderously disposed Unholy Father makes the answer clear.

Why does it matter that there isn't a pope at any given time when this cardboard pope of theirs serves no purpose?  In fact, given that the V2 papal claimants have done little besides ruining souls, we would have been better off without a pope during the past 60+ years than to have these popes.  It's like when the US government goes into shut down, and no one notices, and we're actually better off without them.

I love how they complain about not having a pope when for them the pope serves no purpose.

You know, Lad, I have to acknowledge and even commend your out-of-the-box thinking on this issue.  Never thought I'd do that.  You're right, V-2 popes do little except ruin souls.  We could have done without them for the past 60 years.  We can certainly do without this current papal knuckle-dragger,  who plunges the church even more deeply into this 'Mad Max,' dystopian nightmare of a world in absolute ruin and chaos.  It's Genesis one all over again, when the world was void and empty, and darkness was on the face of the deep.  Catholics must hitch up their drawers, and finally admit that Francis is a fake and a phony, an evil interloper, who is not even Cadtholic 

No word is more effective than “sede-vacantist” for shutting down intelligent Catholic conversation on the Church crisis, ecclesiastical masonry or Jєω-popes.

Kinda the way the Jews use 'antisemitism' to shut any discussion about their wayward race.

(239) The Pope Speaks! YOU Decide! - YouTube

FYI: Louie V has since taken the Sedevacantist position. 

Yes he has.

No, lets talk about the last 2000 years. You are inferring that we really didn’t need a pope all that time, correct?

No. Incorrect. Did you even read the snip I posted? You should. It explains a lot in just a few sentences.

Let's keep on topic and talk about today and how sedes prove they do not need a pope by having kept the faith without any pope  - or hierarchy or priests for the last 60 years, all the while excoriating R&R over the matter.