Interesting discussion about what Tradition means.
So, the original Modernists held that Tradition can be understood differently as time goes by.
But the neo-Modernists put a layer of misdirection on it. "Yes, Tradition, but you have to understand it the way the Church understands it." ... and then proceed to impose their understanding onto it, claiming it's the Church's.
Thus you get where EENS actually means the opposite of EENS, so that if you hold fast to the actual words, it's heretical. If you say that heretics, schismatics, infidels, etc. cannot be saved, you're actually a heretic ... despite the fact that it's precisely what the text says. "See the Church understands by EENS that heretics and infidels CAN be saved, you silly heretic, you."
As various Modernist theologians put spins on things, that "theological consensus" became "how the Church understands it". Which is where Cekadism falls apart.