The sede cries in pain as he strikes you!
Or, the pot calling the kettle black.
As a third-party observer (albeit not totally impartial) I don't see Sean's opponents as being significantly different in their words, tactics, or rhetoric.
Reader, do you see a difference? I don't.
Let's be real: if Sean is proud, then so are his opponents on this thread. I don't see much difference in tone, words, or vehemence. Both have hit below the belt (personal jabs, ribs, attacks, sarcasm). Both are quoting Doctors of the Church. Both are thoroughly convinced they are correct.
How is one proud, but the other is not? Explain it to me.